Ben Paxton
@drbenpaxton.bsky.social
690 followers 230 following 100 posts
Senior Researcher at the @instituteforgov.bsky.social. Views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
Really looking forward to chatting with this brilliant panel about how to make sure pay and pensions help attract and keep the high-quality public sector workerforce the government needs
Reposted by Ben Paxton
stuarthoddinott.bsky.social
This interview is so much worse than the headline lets on
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
14. Finally, any new procurement legislation should be focused on providing clarification and standardisation, without adding unnecessary complexity or instability to the relatively new (and widely recognised as very good) Procurement Act, which people are very much still getting to grips with.
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
13. The commercial profession has a strong, cross-gov identity and network – this should be leveraged to foster wider collaboration. The GCF should continue to support the communities of practice that have grown in recent years.
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
(It’s easy to say commercial capability should be maintained, but it will be difficult to do when facing targets for 10% admin budget cuts by 28/29)

12. So GCF and departments should use missions to guide prioritisation on capability
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
11. The Government Commercial Function should develop a long-term strategy for boosting the number of senior commercial specialists within government departments and their ALBs, and establish the expectation that all those managing contracts are commercial specialists
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
The final group of recs are on strengthening procurement capability and data

10. Managing Public Money guidance should be updated to make accounting officers responsible for procurement data, and the new central digital platform should focus on public sector orgs + suppliers being able to use it
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
9. Government should make the most of ‘pull’ mechanisms to promote innovation. This should include Innovate UK's Contracts for Innovation and also Advance Market Commitments that could be used to incentivise development of scalable innovation (low carbon concrete e.g. ⬇️)
www.ukri.org/news/innovat...
Innovate UK invests £3.2 million in concrete decarbonisation
Innovate UK will invest £3.2 million in seven projects to accelerate decarbonisation of the UK concrete industry.
www.ukri.org
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
8. DSIT should be coordinating procurement of innovation, with support from the Cabinet Office. They should be using procurement data to identify opportunities for collaboration, and the new Commercial Innovation Hub should share best practice in buying innovation
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
7. Public sector organisations should have multi-disciplinary teams horizon scanning for contracts due to expire/be renewed, proactively reviewing how technological and/or social innovation could improve outcomes in these areas (this should be easier to do with a better Find a Tender service)
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
6. Cabinet Office/DSIT should publish further guidance setting out best practice in procuring innovation (with legislation changing, and risk aversion widespread, contracting authorities are often uncertain about what should/shouldn’t be done)
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
The 2nd group of recommendations are on better using procurement to bring innovation to the public sector

4. Ministers must back civil servants to procure innovation, even following failure

5. Preliminary market engagement should be a core part of procurement (which it very much isn’t right now)
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
2. A mission-led approach means procurement being more outcomes-focused. This includes earlier market engagement on outcomes rather than highly specified solutions, and KPIs being aligned with those outcomes

3. Publish longer-term 3y pipelines, giving industry sight of upcoming opportunities
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
1. Commercial leads for each mission should work with commercial leaders across gov to proactively and publicly identify new opportunities for the market to support delivery of missions (which would be easier if gov publicly defined a more coherent set out outcomes in relation to the missions…)
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
So how could this change? Lots of recommendations below, split into 3 sections: market shaping, innovation, and capability/data

First up, government is a huge buyer (>£400bn!) and therefore implicitly shapes markets it operates in. The public sector should be much more proactive in how it does this
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
c) A lack of forward planning for innovation
d) Limited commercial input into policy design (partly from a lack of senior commercial capability)
e) The poor (but improving) quality of procurement data, which limits internal strategic oversight and industry insight into contracting opportunities
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
But barriers to making this a reality are:
a) A lack of coherence in the gov's missions - suppliers don’t know how they could support them
b) Pervasive aversion to risk/uncertainty - which often means rolling over contracts + sticking to familiar specs/suppliers, rather than trying new approaches
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
The 4 key ways we think procurement could support a more mission-led approach are by:
1. Proactively shaping public sector markets
2. Procuring new solutions
3. Supporting a focus on challenges or outcomes (rather than highly specified inputs/outputs)
4. Enabling collaboration across government
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
Procurement is massively underrated as an opportunity for improvement, and where a mission-led approach could make a difference.
Our NEW REPORT explores why this change is hard, and how procurement should be used to shape markets + drive innovation🧵
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...
The role of procurement in delivering mission-led government | Institute for Government
How can the government remove the barriers to its missions?
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Reposted by Ben Paxton
njdavies.bsky.social
NEW REPORT: @instituteforgovernment.org.uk finds that confused missions, pervasive risk aversion, poor data quality, insufficient commericial capability, and a failure to focus on outcomes means that govt is failing to make the most of £400bn+ a year it spends on procurement
The role of procurement in delivering mission-led government | Institute for Government
How can the government remove the barriers to its missions?
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
But whatever the motivation for making the Child Poverty Taskforce internal, it's not politically straightforward for the government right now. And of course, its chaired by Bridget Philipson, who is currently trying to win over party members - a dynamic that couldn't have been foreseen a year ago