Chika Okafor
@drchikaokafor.bsky.social
4.6K followers 220 following 23 posts
Assistant Professor of Law at Northwestern | Founder of Todaydream Economist, lawyer, and social entrepreneur working on tough societal problems Academic: https://sites.harvard.edu/chika-okafor/ Todaydream: https://www.todaydream.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Chika Okafor
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
This isn't about bad intentions. It's about math.

Where networks matter most—hiring, admissions, promotions—colorblind rules still reproduce inequality.
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
My research shows why “colorblind” policies don’t actually produce fairness — a dynamic I call social network discrimination:

1️⃣ Smaller groups form fewer ties, all else being equal
2️⃣ Networks amplify majority advantage
3️⃣ Fewer opportunities follow"
Reposted by Chika Okafor
ipratnu.bsky.social
Research by @drchikaokafor.bsky.social finds that minority groups receive fewer economic & social opportunities at work, even under “colorblind” policies. The research challenges assumptions that race-neutral approaches ensure fairness in professional settings. spr.ly/63326ATd7g
Minority groups receive fewer opportunities at work, despite ‘colorblind’ argument
Research highlights the important role of social networks in the labor markets
spr.ly
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
This finding has major implications for post-affirmative action diversity policies and our understanding of what truly constitutes merit-based systems.
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
The reason is "social network discrimination"—a phenomenon I uncover in which minority groups receive fewer opportunities simply because their social group is smaller, even when everything else is equal.
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
No—as my research discovers.

Picture three employees at a networking event with job applicants. Everything is equal—same qualifications, same employment levels, no bias. But by the end, minority applicants receive fewer than 30% of the job referrals despite being over 33% of the group.
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
Imagine a world that is both fully equal and fully colorblind—satisfying the vision of both the political left and political right. Would outcomes between majority and minority groups remain fair over time?
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
🚨🚨🚨 My new research, published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Law and Economics, challenges core assumptions about diversity and merit.

Full paper: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...

@ipratnu.bsky.social

#econsky #lawsky #blacksky
Seeing Through Color Blindness: Social Networks as a Mechanism for Discrimination | The Journal of Law and Economics: Vol 68, No 3
Abstract I study labor markets in which firms both hire via referrals and are race blind or color-blind. I develop an employment model showing that despite initial equality in ability, employment, wages, and network structure, minorities receive disproportionately fewer jobs through referrals and lower expected wages, simply because their social group is smaller. This discriminatory outcome, which I term “social network discrimination,” arises from homophily and falls outside the dominant economics discrimination models, which are taste based and statistical. I calibrate the model using a nationally representative sample of youth networks to estimate the lower bound welfare gap caused by social network discrimination, which also disadvantages black workers. This paper isolates a potential underlying mechanism for inequality, adding to the understanding of labor-market disparities that have been widely studied across the social sciences. In doing so, the paper disproves the proposition that color-blind policies inherently promote individual merit.
www.journals.uchicago.edu
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
🚨 I am hiring a Predoctoral Research Fellow to join me at Northwestern University! 🚨

You'll work on cutting-edge research at the intersection of economics, law, and public policy.

Apply now (decisions are rolling)

Details here: tinyurl.com/NU-predoc

#econ_ra #predoc #econsky
Northwestern University "N" logo
Reposted by Chika Okafor
taylorowen.bsky.social
Over the past few years I've had the chance to have podcast conversations about technology and democracy with 70+ people that I respect and admire. This week's episode with @ruha9.bsky.social, on how she thinks about AI and imagining the future, may be my favorite. podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/m...
How Silicon Valley Monopolized Our Imagination
Podcast Episode · Machines Like Us · 2024-12-03 · 46m
podcasts.apple.com
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
My past @newsweek.com op-ed proposed a path forward on climate change that leverages its congruence with core Christian values. But this approach fails if too many Christians disavow Christian values.... My op-ed is here: www.newsweek.com/building-nex...

#climatesky #energysky #politics #greensky
Building the Next Pro-Life Movement
The dangers of climate change are more acknowledged today than ever before. But that is not enough.
www.newsweek.com
drchikaokafor.bsky.social
"...multiple pastors had told him they would quote the Sermon on the Mount.... Someone would come up after the service and ask, 'Where did you get those liberal talking points?'...'When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.'"
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
“What was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, ‘I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ,’ the response would not be, ‘I apologize.’ The response would be, ‘Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak,’” Moore said."

newrepublic.com/post/174950/...
Christianity Today Editor: Evangelicals Call Jesus “Liberal” and “Weak”
A former evangelical leader is sounding the alarm about the direction his religion is headed in.
newrepublic.com
Reposted by Chika Okafor
mcpli.bsky.social
One thing I think people talking about the threat of authoritarian creep have gotten, if not exactly wrong, not quite right either is to frame discussion in terms of various European precedents.

Those are relevant to be sure, but we also have an American precedent - namely the South before 1965.
Reposted by Chika Okafor
appsbymarcie.bsky.social
‘Okafor chose climate change for the third and final chapter, and the focus of his time at Radcliffe, because it’s “the 800-pound gorilla in the room that will make just about every index of inequality wider and significantly impact the people who are already most’ vulnerable in our society.”