Christopher R. Matthews
@drcrmatthews.bsky.social
4K followers 3.4K following 350 posts
▪︎ Reading, writing & thinking about the moral foundation of scholarship ▪︎ Author of Doing Good Social Science: http://bit.ly/3EgFA2z ▪︎ More about my work: immersiveresearch.co.uk ▪︎ DM for speaking/workshop requests
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Im saying to people we provide bland research philosophy statements, in the large part.
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Your philosophical position is most obvious in how you produce, understand and treat data. One of the less obviously places it comes across is usually in a bland and hackneyed statement of 'Philosophical Position'. Research philosophy is practical and pragmatic more than it is explicable in prose.
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Its honest, that all the really matters to me.
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
What a lovely thing to say, thanks. Not only do I see them show up where you suggest, they show up in my own work! I make that point somewhere in something ive writen on the topic
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Ive been teaching in HE since 2008. Every year at least one ernest undergraduate has told me 'there's no research on [insert topic]'. And, of course, every time they have been dead wrong. I do love a wee academic truism.
Reposted by Christopher R. Matthews
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
"Social scientific methods are not as they should be." Some chronic problems that i'm pretty sure you've come across are outlined below 👇 and you can read more here - journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Im a lucky/privileged one in that regard so I will not comment
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Absolutely wholesome interactions between people on what ever level are great to see.
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Oh, nice detail. Im digging it, bit nerdy 🤓
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Ive started referring to myself as a social scientist. Largely because I use social theory and philosophy from across disciplines to frame the science and scholarship I do and the books i write. It feels cogent and useful to me, but if can certainly be a slippy and abused framing of what some do.
Reposted by Christopher R. Matthews
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Interrogating the foundations from which good science can flow, allows scholars to see that we all have much in common despite important differences. So I wrote this to capture key elements of *all* (social) science - journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Reposted by Christopher R. Matthews
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
"Social science methods are not as they should be." In this paper I expand my critique of the 'epistemological fictions' that offen sit at the core of thinking & writing in disciplines such as psychology, criminology, sociology and interpretative science more broadly. Please do share 🙏
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
DM me if youd like to read the full chapter, cheers 🍻
Reposted by Christopher R. Matthews
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
And in relation to the second half of the original post, if you want a longform read you could try the book in my bio, specifically Part 2. Do drop me a message if youd like to discuss further. Cheers 🍻
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
He'll tell us he's doing his best/duty etc. And ill tell him he is a central part of the biggest problem humanity faces.
drcrmatthews.bsky.social
I get that people who think in such uncritical ways will claim to being 'pragmatic'. But they are complicity in making & maintaining education as business (capitalist realism writ large). When clearly it should be understood & engaged with as a social good & thus protected from the profit motive.