Dr David Robert Grimes
@drg.bsky.social
2.6K followers 180 following 140 posts
Cancer researcher, physicist, scoundrel. Author (#TheIrrationalApe / #GoodThinking). Science, Medicine, Foppish hair. Alt socials: https://linktr.ee/drg1985
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
drg.bsky.social
Disappointing to see Joe Wicks fearmongering about ultra-processed foods. Aside from fact that data on UPFs is inherently confounded & often reflects things like poverty (an actual killer), this reel by Joshua Hill explains why such nonsense is so deeply harmful
www.instagram.com/reel/DPUGquB...
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
www.instagram.com
Reposted by Dr David Robert Grimes
drg.bsky.social
Do not mistake this as benign - breaking up MMR into separate shots is inherently antivaccine, as it promotes myth of "vaccine overload" & makes it much more unlikely people will get their children vaccinated. Also, single vaccines aren't available in USA!
www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...
Acting CDC director calls to 'break up' the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine into three shots
Individual vaccines for each virus aren't available in the U.S., and no published scientific evidence shows a benefit to separating the combined vaccine.
www.nbcnews.com
drg.bsky.social
Ha, that reminds me - I've built a shiny app you might like that does something fun with retracted papers, I'll DM you..
Reposted by Dr David Robert Grimes
drg.bsky.social
Asked lots about this piece on Chronic Lyme disease, and disappointed in the @guardian (a publication I both subscribe and contribute to) for running it. Short thread explaining the multitude of problems with it, and why I consider it irresponsible to run as is..🧵
drg.bsky.social
And before anyone says "well pitch your own piece!" the reality is that outlets like the @theguardian.com (and many others) are less and less receptive to freelance pitches, Correctives are highly unlikely to see the light of day, and never get the clicks of offending article either 🤷‍♂️
drg.bsky.social
Since the piece went live, I've got a steady stream of worried people asking about it -I wish outlets would stop this kind of harmful journalism. In medical science, we need factchecking and expertise more than ever, not unhelpfully credulous pieces which elevate pseudoscience..
drg.bsky.social
One response it is just a human interest story, but this doesn't negate responsibility of @theguardian.com to check things. As I wrote in The Irrational Ape, Andrew Wakefield's mendacious linking of autism to MMR vaccine only got traction in UK media due to such irresponsible credulity!
drg.bsky.social
CLD isn't alone in this respect - there's many dubious conditions for which charlatans push expensive therapies; Adrenal Fatigue, Toxic Mould, Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. While patients might find label comforting, false diagnosis exploits them and may delay real treatment..
drg.bsky.social
The major problem with the piece is that the author cites fringe figures and positions uncritically, whilst utterly ignoring the reasons why mainstream medical evidence doesn't support existence of CLD, nor the cottage industry of dubious tests and treatments offered at high cost..
drg.bsky.social
The piece has these red-flags without any scepticism. For instance, unhappy with NHS, author sought 2nd opinion from a doctor whose work is presented in glowing terms. Doesn't mention potential vested interest that same doctor charges £399 for online consultations on (fringe) CLD
drg.bsky.social
And while medical opinion does not support existence of CLD, 1000s of alternative healers & self-described "Lyme literate physicians" prescribe (at high cost) dubious treatments & tests for it: hell, I wrote about this in @theguardian.com 9 years ago! www.theguardian.com/science/blog...
drg.bsky.social
..with people desperate for answers, Chronic Lyme Disease (CLD) often blamed with scant evidence. The problem? While Lyme disease is real, testable, & eminently treatable, there's no evidence that CLD exists, plenty it doesn't, as @gorskon.bsky.social writes
sciencebasedmedicine.org/fake-diagnos...
Chronic Lyme disease: Fake diagnosis, not fake disease
Believe it or not, an encounter on Twitter actually changed Dr. Gorski's mind. Chronic Lyme disease is a fake diagnosis, not a fake disease.
sciencebasedmedicine.org
drg.bsky.social
First, suffering of author's daughter is not in question - ME/CFS is a poorly understood condition, often associated with viral infections (think long COVID). It is severely debilitating, search for answers understandable. But some answers are false, exploitative, even harmful..
drg.bsky.social
Asked lots about this piece on Chronic Lyme disease, and disappointed in the @guardian (a publication I both subscribe and contribute to) for running it. Short thread explaining the multitude of problems with it, and why I consider it irresponsible to run as is..🧵
Reposted by Dr David Robert Grimes
drg.bsky.social
If you're a clinician or researcher in Ireland feeling a little overwhelmed by statistics, join myself & @cathalwalsh.bsky.social on 11th October in SJH for a 6-credit CPD Essential Medical Statistics, where we'll demystify things together. Tickets here!

www.eventbrite.ie/e/essential-...
Essential Medical Statistics and Evidence Appraisal
Learn how to interpret and apply essential medical statistics and evidence in a practical and engaging way at our upcoming event!
www.eventbrite.ie
drg.bsky.social
Yup - easier to jam things into one's pre-conceived mental filing cabinet and ignore bits that clearly don't fit than to concede that one's underlying filing system may be wrong and to revise it. Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug.
drg.bsky.social
It's pretty insane on the face of it alright!
drg.bsky.social
..not linking to it as it's garbage, but man alive, can people please learn the difference between conservative and reactionary and stop letting the latter cosplay as the former?
drg.bsky.social
Given the values espoused by Farage are chiefly racism and mendacity, I suppose it takes a particular kind of bravery to write a piece in a national newspaper this asinine...
drg.bsky.social
We just looked at another report in this report on glyphosate which is fatally flawed. Given editors time to respond, but they haven't yet, so we'll preprint it soon. Spoiler: It's bad. And I have theories on how it gets in...
drg.bsky.social
This is my problem too. I find it very difficult to look past the pro-Russian talking points + Wallace / Daly. Also, anyone who had even done minimal diligence on GOD in 2018 would have realised she was already spouting dangerous nonsense, ignored because of "anti-corruption" framing..