Keith Taber
drkeithstaber.bsky.social
Keith Taber
@drkeithstaber.bsky.social
Retired former school and college science teacher; science teacher educator, research supervisor, and research methods lecturer. Emeritus Professor of Science Education at the University of Cambridge. Interested in HPS, music, photography, peace & justice.
I get loads of these invitations which invite me to submit a paper within the next 3 weeks or less! No serious journal would ever do that.

(science-education-research.com/academic-sta...)
Predatory journals
A topic in Academic standards and scholarly / scientific values Predatory journals Predatory journals present as research journals, and invite authors to submit work for publication. They charge fe…
science-education-research.com
November 11, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Call me picky, but isn't the phrase 'leader of the free world' somewhat of an oxymoron? Out here in the free world we do not recognise this leader!

In the free world we elect representatives, and hold them to account when they are not up to the job.

(I know UK has a King. I did not vote for him.)
November 11, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Beautiful. Thank you.
November 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
I can see why they feel the need to try to convince readers that it is really an official website.
November 3, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Beyond parody!
August 8, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Were these all new numbers, new to mathematicians, or is it just that Mr Trump had not come across them before?
August 8, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Make a state? Perhaps. Or: "bring under the control of the central government as distinguished from the separate units constituting a federation."
Hm. Trumpsville, USA.
August 6, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Can I clarify: the plan is not to take a nuclear reactor to the moon, but to build one there.

From a kit…?

or from scratch? (Using flints perhaps?)

And what is it going to be used for? Lunar submarines? Powering all those cities?

Next: a 1:1 scale matchstick model of the Eiffel tower on Mercury?
August 5, 2025 at 10:06 PM
You are right. I think Trump gets the focus because he repeatedly lies about things in obvious contexts, he talks incorehently and shows such ignorance of science, maths, geography, history; he is rude and abusive in ways that would get most politicians dropped

So perhaps he is a MAGA masterstroke?
August 3, 2025 at 2:50 PM
I was not asking for a retraction, but a published comment pointing out the flaws. But I really could not understand how it ever got through peer review as the issues were SO obvious. (I'm not a stats person, and it leapt out at me.)
August 3, 2025 at 2:46 PM