@drlipin.bsky.social
Same against Aidvantage
February 14, 2025 at 2:49 AM
Same against Aidvantage
Trump’s reliance on unitary executive theory ignores legal precedent and threatens constitutional democracy. Courts have repeatedly rejected unchecked executive power. 🚨 #ConstitutionMatters
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Trump’s reliance on unitary executive theory ignores legal precedent and threatens constitutional democracy. Courts have repeatedly rejected unchecked executive power. 🚨 #ConstitutionMatters
United States v. Nixon (1974)
• SCOTUS rejected Nixon’s absolute executive privilege argument, stating:
“Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications… can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege.”
• SCOTUS rejected Nixon’s absolute executive privilege argument, stating:
“Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications… can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege.”
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
United States v. Nixon (1974)
• SCOTUS rejected Nixon’s absolute executive privilege argument, stating:
“Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications… can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege.”
• SCOTUS rejected Nixon’s absolute executive privilege argument, stating:
“Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications… can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege.”
INS v. Chadha (1983)
• SCOTUS reaffirmed that the President cannot override congressional authority arbitrarily.
• SCOTUS reaffirmed that the President cannot override congressional authority arbitrarily.
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
INS v. Chadha (1983)
• SCOTUS reaffirmed that the President cannot override congressional authority arbitrarily.
• SCOTUS reaffirmed that the President cannot override congressional authority arbitrarily.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)
• The Supreme Court ruled against Truman’s seizure of steel mills, affirming that presidential power must stem from either the Constitution or Congress.
• The Supreme Court ruled against Truman’s seizure of steel mills, affirming that presidential power must stem from either the Constitution or Congress.
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)
• The Supreme Court ruled against Truman’s seizure of steel mills, affirming that presidential power must stem from either the Constitution or Congress.
• The Supreme Court ruled against Truman’s seizure of steel mills, affirming that presidential power must stem from either the Constitution or Congress.
Federalist No. 47 (James Madison)
• “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
• “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Federalist No. 47 (James Madison)
• “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
• “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 1 & Article II, Section 3)
• “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
• “He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
• “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
• “He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 1 & Article II, Section 3)
• “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
• “He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
• “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
• “He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Additionally, President Trump has issued numerous executive orders, some of which have been blocked by federal judges, indicating a significant legal confrontation over the boundaries of executive authority.
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Additionally, President Trump has issued numerous executive orders, some of which have been blocked by federal judges, indicating a significant legal confrontation over the boundaries of executive authority.
Recently, the administration has signaled it might ignore court orders that impede its plans, challenging the constitutional limits of government powers.
February 11, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Recently, the administration has signaled it might ignore court orders that impede its plans, challenging the constitutional limits of government powers.
Thanks for reading! If you found this thread informative, share it & let’s keep the discussion going. What are your thoughts on balancing government efficiency with legal accountability? 🏛️⚖️ #GovEfficiency #ConstitutionalLaw #SeparationOfPowers
February 10, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Thanks for reading! If you found this thread informative, share it & let’s keep the discussion going. What are your thoughts on balancing government efficiency with legal accountability? 🏛️⚖️ #GovEfficiency #ConstitutionalLaw #SeparationOfPowers
Efficiency in government is important, but sacrificing legality for speed undermines democracy. If you see proposals for a DOGE-like agency, look for these legal red flags. We must hold government accountable, not just make it “efficient.”
February 10, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Efficiency in government is important, but sacrificing legality for speed undermines democracy. If you see proposals for a DOGE-like agency, look for these legal red flags. We must hold government accountable, not just make it “efficient.”