🇨🇦 DRoberts 🇨🇦
@drobertsderlc.bsky.social
Husband, father, grandfather, dog owner and tax lawyer, with interests in sustainability, design, technology, urban planning, music & classic cars.
If she had an AirTag on, and that was how the owners were able to track her to the beach, then why didn’t it lead the rescuers straight to her in the water? Did the AirTag stop working once she was in the water?
December 4, 2025 at 2:23 AM
If she had an AirTag on, and that was how the owners were able to track her to the beach, then why didn’t it lead the rescuers straight to her in the water? Did the AirTag stop working once she was in the water?
Not a referendum, as that would be divisive and do long term damage to Alberta’s economy (see Quebec).
We need this petition question to be put to a vote in the AB Legislature, and the Legislature to vote “Yes” in such numbers as to put the issue of separation to rest for the foreseeable future!
We need this petition question to be put to a vote in the AB Legislature, and the Legislature to vote “Yes” in such numbers as to put the issue of separation to rest for the foreseeable future!
December 2, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Not a referendum, as that would be divisive and do long term damage to Alberta’s economy (see Quebec).
We need this petition question to be put to a vote in the AB Legislature, and the Legislature to vote “Yes” in such numbers as to put the issue of separation to rest for the foreseeable future!
We need this petition question to be put to a vote in the AB Legislature, and the Legislature to vote “Yes” in such numbers as to put the issue of separation to rest for the foreseeable future!
and then make sure that ALL communities experiencing redevelopment activity in their low density districts have new local area plans in place that include appropriate locational rules?
If not, then why not? /End
If not, then why not? /End
November 20, 2025 at 2:27 PM
and then make sure that ALL communities experiencing redevelopment activity in their low density districts have new local area plans in place that include appropriate locational rules?
If not, then why not? /End
If not, then why not? /End
These WCLAP locational rules appear to already achieve the result that you & the other Councillors that campaigned on repealing blanket rezoning are looking for, so instead of repealing the R-CG zoning, wouldn’t it be better for Council to review these locational rules, tweak them as needed, /5
November 20, 2025 at 2:22 PM
These WCLAP locational rules appear to already achieve the result that you & the other Councillors that campaigned on repealing blanket rezoning are looking for, so instead of repealing the R-CG zoning, wouldn’t it be better for Council to review these locational rules, tweak them as needed, /5
Section 2.2.1.6 of the WCLAP sets out rules that limit on which low density parcels 3+ unit developments should be approved. Those parcels include laned parcels near transit stations, on corners, on or just off Main streets, and adjacent to or across from schools or green spaces. /4
November 20, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Section 2.2.1.6 of the WCLAP sets out rules that limit on which low density parcels 3+ unit developments should be approved. Those parcels include laned parcels near transit stations, on corners, on or just off Main streets, and adjacent to or across from schools or green spaces. /4
When you gave examples of appropriate areas/parcels, such as on laned parcels on corners & near transit stations, Main streets, parks, schools, etc., it struck me that what you were describing already exists in the communities governed by the new Westbrook Communities Local Area Plan (WCLAP). /3
November 20, 2025 at 2:07 PM
When you gave examples of appropriate areas/parcels, such as on laned parcels on corners & near transit stations, Main streets, parks, schools, etc., it struck me that what you were describing already exists in the communities governed by the new Westbrook Communities Local Area Plan (WCLAP). /3
I recently listened to both you and Councillor Chabot speak about this new motion to repeal blanket rezoning. Both of you agreed that 3+ unit (not counting suites) developments can be appropriate in certain areas or on certain parcels in low density districts, but not just anywhere. /2
November 20, 2025 at 2:01 PM
I recently listened to both you and Councillor Chabot speak about this new motion to repeal blanket rezoning. Both of you agreed that 3+ unit (not counting suites) developments can be appropriate in certain areas or on certain parcels in low density districts, but not just anywhere. /2
Reposted by 🇨🇦 DRoberts 🇨🇦
Elections Alberta posted a news release about Petition Verification In Progress.
Anyone who signed, please stay vigilant and respond accordingly if you receive a message from Elections Alberta. Their name will be in the call display or email message.
See here for full details: www.elections.ab.ca
Anyone who signed, please stay vigilant and respond accordingly if you receive a message from Elections Alberta. Their name will be in the call display or email message.
See here for full details: www.elections.ab.ca
November 11, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Elections Alberta posted a news release about Petition Verification In Progress.
Anyone who signed, please stay vigilant and respond accordingly if you receive a message from Elections Alberta. Their name will be in the call display or email message.
See here for full details: www.elections.ab.ca
Anyone who signed, please stay vigilant and respond accordingly if you receive a message from Elections Alberta. Their name will be in the call display or email message.
See here for full details: www.elections.ab.ca
Or three wheels — don’t exclude us e-trike riders!
October 27, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Or three wheels — don’t exclude us e-trike riders!