"The appropriate response to democracy-corroding lawful orders is to make them unlawful."

- Javert, apparently

Wouldn't the moderate justices just go to Trump and say we won't give you NLRB and MSPB unless you agree not to try the Fed? Game theory works on the other side too.

It can't, unless no congressperson objects to it, the parliamentarian allows it, or congress overrides the parliamentarian. It's not like Lawfare to miss something like that.

VDare (white supremacist website) is the cherry on top. Get him out.

Saka thinks that drivers can have a little bit of speeding, as a treat. As long as they're not the rabble that like to race. Still though, injury rate data is not quite proof against him. Many collisions are from something other than speed, e.g. distracted or drunk driving.

Rep Jayapal, please consider warning Trump that the statute of limitations on 26 USC § 7217 will not have expired by the time he leaves office, and he can expect to spend time in prison as a result.

That's not what that means. It means that one does not lead to the other, not that they are exclusive with each other.

And here I was thinking that the best security guarantee would be a guarantee of security.

If you had exactly as many parking spaces as cars, you wouldn't be able to drive from one parking space to another, since both need to be free. And, many locations are always trip origins and never destinations (eg people's driveways). So you need to calculate based on cars + trips, not just cars.

Unfortunately, only one of these two can be impeached and removed from their position in the government (AFAIK), so it will have to come back to Trump one way or another.