Drew Graham
@drwgrhm.bsky.social
Indeed, and the SEC (or notionally the FCA) exist to draw that line - by defining who is protected and how, they’re in the process defining who isn’t protected. A position that everyone is due protection is also an invitation for the scammers to retarget that mechanism.
January 19, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Indeed, and the SEC (or notionally the FCA) exist to draw that line - by defining who is protected and how, they’re in the process defining who isn’t protected. A position that everyone is due protection is also an invitation for the scammers to retarget that mechanism.
3) At some level this is natural selection. Not all victims should be compensated.
4) This is a social media problem, not a financial service problem. Facebook etc. should pay.
5) This is a pace-of-change technology and education problem, levy a digital services tax to pay for it.
4) This is a social media problem, not a financial service problem. Facebook etc. should pay.
5) This is a pace-of-change technology and education problem, levy a digital services tax to pay for it.
January 19, 2025 at 2:10 PM
3) At some level this is natural selection. Not all victims should be compensated.
4) This is a social media problem, not a financial service problem. Facebook etc. should pay.
5) This is a pace-of-change technology and education problem, levy a digital services tax to pay for it.
4) This is a social media problem, not a financial service problem. Facebook etc. should pay.
5) This is a pace-of-change technology and education problem, levy a digital services tax to pay for it.
I find myself thinking about this quite a lot recently. Five incompatible answers that I subscribe to:
1) We must wean people off free, instant payments. Ultimately, consumers should pay.
2) Unless we make this entirely the banks’ problem, they will make it not at all their problem.
1) We must wean people off free, instant payments. Ultimately, consumers should pay.
2) Unless we make this entirely the banks’ problem, they will make it not at all their problem.
January 19, 2025 at 2:10 PM
I find myself thinking about this quite a lot recently. Five incompatible answers that I subscribe to:
1) We must wean people off free, instant payments. Ultimately, consumers should pay.
2) Unless we make this entirely the banks’ problem, they will make it not at all their problem.
1) We must wean people off free, instant payments. Ultimately, consumers should pay.
2) Unless we make this entirely the banks’ problem, they will make it not at all their problem.
Happy to do this for you. It’s trivial if you have these files on something attached to a linux box or vm. You can ping me on [email protected].
January 14, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Happy to do this for you. It’s trivial if you have these files on something attached to a linux box or vm. You can ping me on [email protected].