Duygu Yıldırım
@duyguyildirim.bsky.social
8.5K followers 1.1K following 290 posts
Assistant Professor of History at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. PhD from Stanford. Exploring the intersections of knowledge, medicine, and natural history in the early modern Mediterranean. Istanbulite.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Hello everyone! I’m a historian of science and medicine focusing on the botanical encounters between the Ottoman Empire and early modern Europe. I am currently completing my first monograph, and you can find some of my publications here:
utk.academia.edu/DuyguYildirim
Duygu Yildirim | University of Tennessee Knoxville - Academia.edu
I am a historian of science and medicine specialized in the early modern Mediterranean and in the Ottoman Empire. Broadly, my work focuses on cross-cultural…
utk.academia.edu
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
I’d heard so much praise for this book and finally found time to read it. It’s a fascinating read that pushes us to reconsider the Eurocentric nature of Marxist accounts of production that often erase the history of medieval slavery.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
We don’t often think about how, after the Morisco expulsion, no free Muslim communities remained in Western Europe. For many premodern Europeans, the only Muslims they saw in their lives were enslaved ones in brutal conditions; an imprint on Europe’s memory that can’t be denied…
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
On day one of teaching Ottoman history, a student asked me who my favorite sultan is. I just realized I’d never actually thought about it before. 😃
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
I just heard from our editor that the Bloomsbury - A Cultural History of Technology is set for publication next year! I contributed with a chapter on seventeenth-century food technologies and can’t wait to see this comprehensive volume in print soon!
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
That would be great, thank you!
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Are there any historians here working on the history of wine? I'm currently writing an article on the topic and would be glad to exchange ideas or drafts if anyone is interested. 🍇
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Just submitted my book for peer review. It has grown into something quite different from my dissertation with new research, thinking, and lots of writing, supported by a postdoctoral fellowship and an ACLS fellowship. Grateful to those who believed in this project from the start.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Proofreading is basically gaslighting yourself over typos.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Historians of science and art historians: has anyone written about why some flower illustrations were left uncolored in Fuchs’ De historia stirpium? I have some hypotheses, but I'd love to know if there's already an argument or discussion on this.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
In my book chapter, I wrote about the randomness of early modern knowledge exchanges. One comment captured it perfectly: “like the kind of exchange you have while picking up a bagel at your local shop, knowledge is made not just in conferences, but in everyday encounters” 🥯
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
The question I asked is more about how scholars of the seventeenth century envisioned the history of knowledge.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Thank you! I am revising my book manuscript so I just wanted to share this challenge for brainstorming!
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Yes; so I think there were at least three kinds of historical thinking in the 17th century: one that thinks about lost and found, the other is more about novelties; and the last one is about writing world histories of knowledge like appreciating Arabic science, for example.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
But also invention was not innovation because they thought they were rediscovering. So this is the tricky part…
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
But what about “lost and found” discourse? Like they were not “inventing” but “rediscovering?”
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
And I’d say in the 17th century, but there has been a disagreement :)
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
Maybe some historians (and philosophers) contribute: I’m discussing with a colleague (based on my book chapter) when knowledge began to be presumed as progressing linearly. One answer is the late 19th century, another says post-1750s. But what about the 17th century?
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
“Life is short
And the art long;
The occasion is instant,
Experiment perilous,
Decision difficult.”
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
The new academic year starts in less than a month and I’ve yet to experience this so-called “summer break.”
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
In the early modern Ottoman Empire, the most valued tulips featured long, pointed petals and slender forms in contrast to the rounded varieties preferred in Europe. 🌷
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
The argument, I think, is clear from the title: we can’t fully understand Ottoman and European knowledge interactions without recognizing the role of uncertainty and the art of making relevance.
duyguyildirim.bsky.social
The book’s intro is ready to go…

The final title might still change slightly, but for now it’s:

“Uncertain Knowledge: The Science of Making Relevance between the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe”