Dwarvenhobble
@dwarvenhobble.bsky.social
I currently blog about games and other media on https://entertainmentnasty.blogspot.com/
I was once cited by Jason Schrier for a Kotaku article trying to save Christmas for some indie devs no really.....https://tinyurl.com/54xuejut
I was once cited by Jason Schrier for a Kotaku article trying to save Christmas for some indie devs no really.....https://tinyurl.com/54xuejut
What to be the internet version of genital warts that just keeps reappearing?
January 19, 2026 at 2:21 AM
What to be the internet version of genital warts that just keeps reappearing?
You know you can just not do it right?
January 18, 2026 at 1:49 AM
You know you can just not do it right?
Oh come on my retort to that was a classic and you cut it off.
a bulldog laying on the floor with the words you 're no fun below it
ALT: a bulldog laying on the floor with the words you 're no fun below it
media.tenor.com
January 17, 2026 at 7:20 PM
Oh come on my retort to that was a classic and you cut it off.
Dude, you're a known liar and are still doing what I believe is called "Ego googling" or searching your own name for mentions here.
Thanks for appearing though to help lend more credibility to my claims lol.
Thanks for appearing though to help lend more credibility to my claims lol.
January 17, 2026 at 7:18 PM
Dude, you're a known liar and are still doing what I believe is called "Ego googling" or searching your own name for mentions here.
Thanks for appearing though to help lend more credibility to my claims lol.
Thanks for appearing though to help lend more credibility to my claims lol.
I remember reading it (or maybe it was the real case it was based on)
January 5, 2026 at 9:05 PM
I remember reading it (or maybe it was the real case it was based on)
Except both parties give their own version of the events it doesn't say accept the students version or the professors as the truth.
January 5, 2026 at 9:04 PM
Except both parties give their own version of the events it doesn't say accept the students version or the professors as the truth.
Yet it has the power to remind people or create a temporary emotional state.
I mean people aren't terrified forever after a horror movie but walking home through a dark deserted area people who have done that route 100 times might suddenly find they're a bit scared this time.
I mean people aren't terrified forever after a horror movie but walking home through a dark deserted area people who have done that route 100 times might suddenly find they're a bit scared this time.
January 4, 2026 at 10:25 PM
Yet it has the power to remind people or create a temporary emotional state.
I mean people aren't terrified forever after a horror movie but walking home through a dark deserted area people who have done that route 100 times might suddenly find they're a bit scared this time.
I mean people aren't terrified forever after a horror movie but walking home through a dark deserted area people who have done that route 100 times might suddenly find they're a bit scared this time.
Except the girl claims the professor tried to grab her leg.
The professor doesn't deny this, he however claims he was standing up and stumbled grabbing her leg to stop himself falling over and the first thing he saw to grab.
The difference is she claimed it was in a sexual context with no stumble
The professor doesn't deny this, he however claims he was standing up and stumbled grabbing her leg to stop himself falling over and the first thing he saw to grab.
The difference is she claimed it was in a sexual context with no stumble
January 4, 2026 at 10:23 PM
Except the girl claims the professor tried to grab her leg.
The professor doesn't deny this, he however claims he was standing up and stumbled grabbing her leg to stop himself falling over and the first thing he saw to grab.
The difference is she claimed it was in a sexual context with no stumble
The professor doesn't deny this, he however claims he was standing up and stumbled grabbing her leg to stop himself falling over and the first thing he saw to grab.
The difference is she claimed it was in a sexual context with no stumble
Yes, which runs smack bang into society and reality pretty hard.
There's a reason we moved beyond Witch Trials and try to make sure we don't slide back to there as a society.
There's a reason we moved beyond Witch Trials and try to make sure we don't slide back to there as a society.
January 4, 2026 at 10:21 PM
Yes, which runs smack bang into society and reality pretty hard.
There's a reason we moved beyond Witch Trials and try to make sure we don't slide back to there as a society.
There's a reason we moved beyond Witch Trials and try to make sure we don't slide back to there as a society.
What if the women politicians and figures in positions of power influenced people to be less tolerant by say reminding them of speeches by female politicians about said issues while the bikini babes did nothing?
It's why a neutral group would have been a good plan.
It's why a neutral group would have been a good plan.
January 4, 2026 at 10:19 PM
What if the women politicians and figures in positions of power influenced people to be less tolerant by say reminding them of speeches by female politicians about said issues while the bikini babes did nothing?
It's why a neutral group would have been a good plan.
It's why a neutral group would have been a good plan.
Except the neutral option is to investigate not believe her purely on her word pretty much.
Also it was presented as her claiming something and him claiming different with no certainty how the events went down.
Also it was presented as her claiming something and him claiming different with no certainty how the events went down.
January 4, 2026 at 10:18 PM
Except the neutral option is to investigate not believe her purely on her word pretty much.
Also it was presented as her claiming something and him claiming different with no certainty how the events went down.
Also it was presented as her claiming something and him claiming different with no certainty how the events went down.
Dude, I've proved you wrong time and time again.
I've shown you Anita saying things you claimed Anita didn't say.
and I'm the one who fell for Astroturfing? When I showed you a known troll bribing people to send threats while on the GG autoblocker whitelist?
I've shown you Anita saying things you claimed Anita didn't say.
and I'm the one who fell for Astroturfing? When I showed you a known troll bribing people to send threats while on the GG autoblocker whitelist?
January 4, 2026 at 10:12 PM
Dude, I've proved you wrong time and time again.
I've shown you Anita saying things you claimed Anita didn't say.
and I'm the one who fell for Astroturfing? When I showed you a known troll bribing people to send threats while on the GG autoblocker whitelist?
I've shown you Anita saying things you claimed Anita didn't say.
and I'm the one who fell for Astroturfing? When I showed you a known troll bribing people to send threats while on the GG autoblocker whitelist?
"therefore the death threats and rise of the fascists were justified...."
Yeh fascists so known for their wanting art to not be censored.
Yes video game boobies are art.
If you don't then you're very much in line with the Church's own Council of Trent's view on Renaissance works in the past.
Yeh fascists so known for their wanting art to not be censored.
Yes video game boobies are art.
If you don't then you're very much in line with the Church's own Council of Trent's view on Renaissance works in the past.
January 4, 2026 at 10:11 PM
"therefore the death threats and rise of the fascists were justified...."
Yeh fascists so known for their wanting art to not be censored.
Yes video game boobies are art.
If you don't then you're very much in line with the Church's own Council of Trent's view on Renaissance works in the past.
Yeh fascists so known for their wanting art to not be censored.
Yes video game boobies are art.
If you don't then you're very much in line with the Church's own Council of Trent's view on Renaissance works in the past.
She literally was calling for it to be done and some of the dunderheads on your own side tried to get multiple games banned from being sold.
www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...
www.change.org/p/indian-gov...
www.change.org/p/rockstar-g...
www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...
www.change.org/p/indian-gov...
www.change.org/p/rockstar-g...
January 4, 2026 at 10:11 PM
She literally was calling for it to be done and some of the dunderheads on your own side tried to get multiple games banned from being sold.
www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...
www.change.org/p/indian-gov...
www.change.org/p/rockstar-g...
www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...
www.change.org/p/indian-gov...
www.change.org/p/rockstar-g...
Which again, rewarding the more extreme option even if it's not shooting them. Fire them without pay is presented by the study as the better option than actually try to investigate.
January 4, 2026 at 10:05 PM
Which again, rewarding the more extreme option even if it's not shooting them. Fire them without pay is presented by the study as the better option than actually try to investigate.
An again 0.3 correlation co-efficient lol.
For all we know they just got a group looking at the sexy female characters who were more likely to believe the professors version of events even without the pictures. It's why a 3rd pure control group would have been better.
For all we know they just got a group looking at the sexy female characters who were more likely to believe the professors version of events even without the pictures. It's why a 3rd pure control group would have been better.
January 4, 2026 at 10:04 PM
An again 0.3 correlation co-efficient lol.
For all we know they just got a group looking at the sexy female characters who were more likely to believe the professors version of events even without the pictures. It's why a 3rd pure control group would have been better.
For all we know they just got a group looking at the sexy female characters who were more likely to believe the professors version of events even without the pictures. It's why a 3rd pure control group would have been better.
Which crashes headlong into the realities of society.
Are women just as capable as men?
If so they are as capable of lying as men. So punishing people based on a persons word along isn't a good societal basis for things. There's a reason we moved beyond old West Mob justice and Witch trials.
Are women just as capable as men?
If so they are as capable of lying as men. So punishing people based on a persons word along isn't a good societal basis for things. There's a reason we moved beyond old West Mob justice and Witch trials.
January 4, 2026 at 10:02 PM
Which crashes headlong into the realities of society.
Are women just as capable as men?
If so they are as capable of lying as men. So punishing people based on a persons word along isn't a good societal basis for things. There's a reason we moved beyond old West Mob justice and Witch trials.
Are women just as capable as men?
If so they are as capable of lying as men. So punishing people based on a persons word along isn't a good societal basis for things. There's a reason we moved beyond old West Mob justice and Witch trials.
yes and they rated the options chosen based on a numerical score then deemed I think it was a higher score to be less tolerant of sexual assault. Which sounds great until you realise it comes down to mob justice basically and a persons word being enough to convict without trial.
January 4, 2026 at 9:59 PM
yes and they rated the options chosen based on a numerical score then deemed I think it was a higher score to be less tolerant of sexual assault. Which sounds great until you realise it comes down to mob justice basically and a persons word being enough to convict without trial.
From a psychological perspective it very much could do as it's creating a temporary emotional state to which would impact judgement on some level.
January 4, 2026 at 9:57 PM
From a psychological perspective it very much could do as it's creating a temporary emotional state to which would impact judgement on some level.
Except again 0.3 correlation + the fact it was based on being more extreme = less tolerant of sexual assault.
So a person could still show they don't tolerate it but because they also believe in innocent until proven guilty they are deemed to more pre sexual assault.......
So a person could still show they don't tolerate it but because they also believe in innocent until proven guilty they are deemed to more pre sexual assault.......
January 4, 2026 at 9:56 PM
Except again 0.3 correlation + the fact it was based on being more extreme = less tolerant of sexual assault.
So a person could still show they don't tolerate it but because they also believe in innocent until proven guilty they are deemed to more pre sexual assault.......
So a person could still show they don't tolerate it but because they also believe in innocent until proven guilty they are deemed to more pre sexual assault.......
By the studies own structure it rewards extreme measure and jumping to conclusions and punishes those who want measured sensible considered responses.
January 4, 2026 at 2:26 PM
By the studies own structure it rewards extreme measure and jumping to conclusions and punishes those who want measured sensible considered responses.