Evan Zoldan
@eczoldan.bsky.social
Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Stoepler Professor of Law, UT Law, researching administrative law, legislation, separation of powers, and state and local government.
Articles here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1449563
Articles here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1449563
There's no good reason everyone can't have two seminars and a course release!
October 24, 2025 at 7:27 PM
There's no good reason everyone can't have two seminars and a course release!
Don't tempt Michael to write "Sign Law."
But if he does, here's a quote from Blackstone: Caligula, who (according to Dio Cassius) wrote his laws in a very small character, and hung them up upon high pillars, the more effectually to ensnare the people.
But if he does, here's a quote from Blackstone: Caligula, who (according to Dio Cassius) wrote his laws in a very small character, and hung them up upon high pillars, the more effectually to ensnare the people.
October 3, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Don't tempt Michael to write "Sign Law."
But if he does, here's a quote from Blackstone: Caligula, who (according to Dio Cassius) wrote his laws in a very small character, and hung them up upon high pillars, the more effectually to ensnare the people.
But if he does, here's a quote from Blackstone: Caligula, who (according to Dio Cassius) wrote his laws in a very small character, and hung them up upon high pillars, the more effectually to ensnare the people.
I don't know, a lot of what I do now could be considered dream interpretation.
July 31, 2025 at 1:21 PM
I don't know, a lot of what I do now could be considered dream interpretation.
In this lecture, I will try to give some perspective on recent Supreme Court decisions, Executive Orders, and agency practices that have upended long-standing foundations of Administrative Law.
More information about the Summit here: www.farb.org/conferences
More information about the Summit here: www.farb.org/conferences
FARB Forum & Conferences | FARB
Join the FARB Forum for key insights on regulatory law & innovative policies. Engage with leaders in professional licensing today!
www.farb.org
July 24, 2025 at 2:05 PM
In this lecture, I will try to give some perspective on recent Supreme Court decisions, Executive Orders, and agency practices that have upended long-standing foundations of Administrative Law.
More information about the Summit here: www.farb.org/conferences
More information about the Summit here: www.farb.org/conferences
For more on the difficulties of classification that plague special legislation clause interpretation, see: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Legislative Design and the Controllable Costs of Special Legislation
Legislation that singles out an identifiable individual for benefits or harms that do not apply to the rest of the population is called “special legislation.” I
papers.ssrn.com
June 30, 2025 at 8:56 PM
For more on the difficulties of classification that plague special legislation clause interpretation, see: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
This case, like many special legislation cases, turns on difficult questions of classification. Because no two things or people are identical, whether they are part of the same class for purposes of special legislation will often have no obvious answer, and may be in the eye of the beholder. /6
June 30, 2025 at 8:56 PM
This case, like many special legislation cases, turns on difficult questions of classification. Because no two things or people are identical, whether they are part of the same class for purposes of special legislation will often have no obvious answer, and may be in the eye of the beholder. /6
Specifically, the court concluded that when two groups do not stand in precisely the same relation to the law as one another, it is not invalid for the law to treat them as two separate classes with different legal consequences. /5
June 30, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Specifically, the court concluded that when two groups do not stand in precisely the same relation to the law as one another, it is not invalid for the law to treat them as two separate classes with different legal consequences. /5
The court sided with the plaintff, holding that a law is not "special" simply because it names a category of conduct and assigns it consequences that differ from those for similar conduct. Rather, a law is special if it singles out a subclass that is otherwise legally the same as a larger class. /4
June 30, 2025 at 8:56 PM
The court sided with the plaintff, holding that a law is not "special" simply because it names a category of conduct and assigns it consequences that differ from those for similar conduct. Rather, a law is special if it singles out a subclass that is otherwise legally the same as a larger class. /4