Each of these tools claims they are the best on their websites after "extensive testing", my advice would be to try them all out yourself before believing any of those claims (and if you don't have the time, use @coderabbitai.bsky.social!)

#buildinpublic - CodeRabbit is free for Open Source!

I have also tried @linearb.bsky.social's AI code review on private GitLab repos, and has to say it probably sits closer to the Greptile end on this scoring too, not as many features (yet) as CodeRabbit, but I know this could be due to GitLab being a lower priority than the GitHub functionality

6️⃣ "Generate unit tests" and other features
7️⃣ Better followup on issues: I know when CodeRabbit is happy with the result as it approves the PR
8️⃣ $24/user/month vs. Greptile's $30/user/month (when billed annually)
9️⃣ The best "Learnings" experience, based on the feedback you give it

Can't make this one, but I'm keen for the next one! 👍

You can add Claude as a reviewer, and ask it for changes/opinions on MRs by doing `/install-github-app` from Claude Code

More info on projects: github.blog/news-insight...

Jira is one step removed from this process, and this allows us to be iterate on multiple issues rapidly.

One downside is there isn't multi-repo epics yet: you can have sub-issues for an issue in a repo, but ideally we would have an epic that spans multiple repos.

Created tasks aren't _amazing_ though, and aren't as details as the tasks in created tasks .md (which it's best for spec kit to use).

But I guess they're useful for transparency to non-technical users!

I know Raycast has so many other cool features, but clipboard history is the only one I use!