܀𓂃 Kaori Fujisawa ‎𓈒𓏸𑁍
banner
edcba000.bsky.social
܀𓂃 Kaori Fujisawa ‎𓈒𓏸𑁍
@edcba000.bsky.social
Forensic and Litigation Consulting
Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
thank you
December 12, 2025 at 11:06 PM
His valid asylum application and work authorization were reportedly disregarded by ICE.

Why
December 12, 2025 at 3:50 PM
You're welcome.
December 12, 2025 at 3:38 PM
You can’t lead an alliance by trying to dismantle it from the inside.

Divide Europe → weaken NATO → strengthen China. That’s the flowchart.

Washington is fighting the EU harder than Beijing ever could.
December 12, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Reposted by ܀𓂃 Kaori Fujisawa ‎𓈒𓏸𑁍
i suggest commenting and sending your comment to your members of congress.
December 12, 2025 at 2:45 PM
thank you
December 12, 2025 at 3:05 PM
That's all I've written.
December 12, 2025 at 3:05 PM
5 If the U.S. normalizes ideological and opinion-based screening of travelers, it legitimizes similar practices by authoritarian governments — including against U.S. citizens abroad.

This undermines U.S. credibility when criticizing authoritarianism.
December 12, 2025 at 3:04 PM
4

Social-media content is inherently contextual and frequently sarcastic, critical, or expressive rather than literal. Border screening based on such material invites misinterpretation and arbitrary enforcement.
December 12, 2025 at 3:03 PM
At a time when the U.S. depends on alliance cohesion, academic exchange, and technological cooperation, this policy sends a damaging signal of distrust toward partners.
December 12, 2025 at 3:02 PM
3 This proposal will disproportionately deter:
Researchers and students
Journalists and human-rights advocates
Business travelers from allied democracies
Ordinary tourists with political opinions
December 12, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Collecting vast quantities of irrelevant personal data increases noise, not signal.
December 12, 2025 at 3:01 PM
2. Absence of Demonstrated Security Necessity

CBP has not shown that mass social-media collection meaningfully improves border security outcomes compared to existing targeted, intelligence-driven screening methods. Bulk data collection is not a substitute for credible intelligence.
December 12, 2025 at 3:01 PM
This is incompatible with the United States’ longstanding role as a global defender of free expression.
December 12, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Visitors will self-censor not because of wrongdoing, but because of fear of misinterpretation by border officials operating under opaque standards.
December 12, 2025 at 3:00 PM
My objections are as follows:

1. Chilling Effect on Lawful Speech

Requiring disclosure of years of social-media history will inevitably chill lawful political speech, academic debate, journalism, and personal expression.
December 12, 2025 at 3:00 PM
This proposal constitutes a major and unjustified intrusion into the private lives, lawful opinions, and expressive activity of visitors and departing travelers, including citizens of allied democratic states who currently enter the U.S. under visa-waiver programs.
December 12, 2025 at 2:59 PM
I have written, and my family in America have written.

I've roughly written about I am writing to formally oppose U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s proposed expansion of social-media data collection for travelers to and from the United States.
December 12, 2025 at 2:58 PM