܀𓂃 Kaori Fujisawa 𓈒𓏸𑁍
@edcba1988.bsky.social
Forensic and Litigation Consulting
Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
I would call this great satire. Except it could probably serve as a pretty close description of what executives in many companies that are supposedly adopting AI at pace are actually thinking & doing.
December 12, 2025 at 12:40 PM
I would call this great satire. Except it could probably serve as a pretty close description of what executives in many companies that are supposedly adopting AI at pace are actually thinking & doing.
At first glance, this looks like “continued support.”
At second glance, it’s very carefully scoped support—designed to be durable under executive volatility and survivable under PLA pressure.
That design choice is the story.
At second glance, it’s very carefully scoped support—designed to be durable under executive volatility and survivable under PLA pressure.
That design choice is the story.
December 12, 2025 at 2:57 AM
At first glance, this looks like “continued support.”
At second glance, it’s very carefully scoped support—designed to be durable under executive volatility and survivable under PLA pressure.
That design choice is the story.
At second glance, it’s very carefully scoped support—designed to be durable under executive volatility and survivable under PLA pressure.
That design choice is the story.
LOL
Section 1268 is not about Korea alone.
It is:
1/A Congressional vote of no confidence in Trump-era alliance management
2/A recognition that alliances now require legal scaffolding to survive executive unpredictability
Section 1268 is not about Korea alone.
It is:
1/A Congressional vote of no confidence in Trump-era alliance management
2/A recognition that alliances now require legal scaffolding to survive executive unpredictability
December 12, 2025 at 2:40 AM
LOL
Section 1268 is not about Korea alone.
It is:
1/A Congressional vote of no confidence in Trump-era alliance management
2/A recognition that alliances now require legal scaffolding to survive executive unpredictability
Section 1268 is not about Korea alone.
It is:
1/A Congressional vote of no confidence in Trump-era alliance management
2/A recognition that alliances now require legal scaffolding to survive executive unpredictability
Ah —the future:
HR ghost you.
The recruiter is a chatbot.
Your reference check is two AIs gossiping about you behind your back.
And somewhere in the cloud, your LLM says:
“Great worker, occasionally unhinged, obsessed with geopolitics, 10/10 would hire.”
What could possibly go wrong?
HR ghost you.
The recruiter is a chatbot.
Your reference check is two AIs gossiping about you behind your back.
And somewhere in the cloud, your LLM says:
“Great worker, occasionally unhinged, obsessed with geopolitics, 10/10 would hire.”
What could possibly go wrong?
December 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Ah —the future:
HR ghost you.
The recruiter is a chatbot.
Your reference check is two AIs gossiping about you behind your back.
And somewhere in the cloud, your LLM says:
“Great worker, occasionally unhinged, obsessed with geopolitics, 10/10 would hire.”
What could possibly go wrong?
HR ghost you.
The recruiter is a chatbot.
Your reference check is two AIs gossiping about you behind your back.
And somewhere in the cloud, your LLM says:
“Great worker, occasionally unhinged, obsessed with geopolitics, 10/10 would hire.”
What could possibly go wrong?
So The U.S. tells Japan and Taiwan to take on more deterrence burden—
and then hands the PLA the compute that accelerates their military-AI development.
This is not just contradictory.
It is strategically incoherent.
It undercuts U.S. credibility across the entire Indo-Pacific alliance structure
and then hands the PLA the compute that accelerates their military-AI development.
This is not just contradictory.
It is strategically incoherent.
It undercuts U.S. credibility across the entire Indo-Pacific alliance structure
December 11, 2025 at 7:29 AM
So The U.S. tells Japan and Taiwan to take on more deterrence burden—
and then hands the PLA the compute that accelerates their military-AI development.
This is not just contradictory.
It is strategically incoherent.
It undercuts U.S. credibility across the entire Indo-Pacific alliance structure
and then hands the PLA the compute that accelerates their military-AI development.
This is not just contradictory.
It is strategically incoherent.
It undercuts U.S. credibility across the entire Indo-Pacific alliance structure
Remains competitive until 2026–27 for huge training runs
Exporting H200 ≠ giving China leftovers.
Exporting H200 = giving China last-generation “near-frontier” compute.
The pie charts show this brutally clearly:
No exports: China stays around ~6–12% of global cutting-edge compute.
Exporting H200 ≠ giving China leftovers.
Exporting H200 = giving China last-generation “near-frontier” compute.
The pie charts show this brutally clearly:
No exports: China stays around ~6–12% of global cutting-edge compute.
December 11, 2025 at 7:24 AM
Remains competitive until 2026–27 for huge training runs
Exporting H200 ≠ giving China leftovers.
Exporting H200 = giving China last-generation “near-frontier” compute.
The pie charts show this brutally clearly:
No exports: China stays around ~6–12% of global cutting-edge compute.
Exporting H200 ≠ giving China leftovers.
Exporting H200 = giving China last-generation “near-frontier” compute.
The pie charts show this brutally clearly:
No exports: China stays around ~6–12% of global cutting-edge compute.
H200 is not a “mid-tier” export. It is the last frontier-class Hopper chip.
H200 =
6× H20 performance
Massive memory bandwidth (4.8 TB/s)
Still used for frontier models in the U.S. (H100/H200 clusters are the backbone of GPT-4/Claude-3-era scaling)
H200 =
6× H20 performance
Massive memory bandwidth (4.8 TB/s)
Still used for frontier models in the U.S. (H100/H200 clusters are the backbone of GPT-4/Claude-3-era scaling)
December 11, 2025 at 7:23 AM
H200 is not a “mid-tier” export. It is the last frontier-class Hopper chip.
H200 =
6× H20 performance
Massive memory bandwidth (4.8 TB/s)
Still used for frontier models in the U.S. (H100/H200 clusters are the backbone of GPT-4/Claude-3-era scaling)
H200 =
6× H20 performance
Massive memory bandwidth (4.8 TB/s)
Still used for frontier models in the U.S. (H100/H200 clusters are the backbone of GPT-4/Claude-3-era scaling)
Have you ever seen 350+ printers in action? Now you have
The Wild Hornets 3D farm runs non-stop — even through power outages and other external challenges.
All for the defenders who critically need drones.
The Wild Hornets 3D farm runs non-stop — even through power outages and other external challenges.
All for the defenders who critically need drones.
December 11, 2025 at 6:48 AM
Have you ever seen 350+ printers in action? Now you have
The Wild Hornets 3D farm runs non-stop — even through power outages and other external challenges.
All for the defenders who critically need drones.
The Wild Hornets 3D farm runs non-stop — even through power outages and other external challenges.
All for the defenders who critically need drones.
Trump: “We love foreign tourists. We just need all their data, their history, their relatives,
Yes, truly the warm hospitality of a nation that definitely isn’t spiraling into soft authoritarianism.
Yes, truly the warm hospitality of a nation that definitely isn’t spiraling into soft authoritarianism.
December 11, 2025 at 12:09 AM
Trump: “We love foreign tourists. We just need all their data, their history, their relatives,
Yes, truly the warm hospitality of a nation that definitely isn’t spiraling into soft authoritarianism.
Yes, truly the warm hospitality of a nation that definitely isn’t spiraling into soft authoritarianism.
When even Denmark — the most polite country on earth — says the U.S. is a “security concern,”
you know the situation has passed the “polite disagreement” stage.
Trump promised to make America respected again.
He just didn’t specify by whom.
Russian intelligence applauds.
Danish intelligence panics.
you know the situation has passed the “polite disagreement” stage.
Trump promised to make America respected again.
He just didn’t specify by whom.
Russian intelligence applauds.
Danish intelligence panics.
December 10, 2025 at 11:45 PM
When even Denmark — the most polite country on earth — says the U.S. is a “security concern,”
you know the situation has passed the “polite disagreement” stage.
Trump promised to make America respected again.
He just didn’t specify by whom.
Russian intelligence applauds.
Danish intelligence panics.
you know the situation has passed the “polite disagreement” stage.
Trump promised to make America respected again.
He just didn’t specify by whom.
Russian intelligence applauds.
Danish intelligence panics.
Politico framed Japan as the villain.
Politico’s version: Japan blocked the EU request and refused to join the Russian-asset plan.
Japan’s official version: “No, we did not reject anything — Politico misrepresented our position.”
Politico’s version: Japan blocked the EU request and refused to join the Russian-asset plan.
Japan’s official version: “No, we did not reject anything — Politico misrepresented our position.”
December 10, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Politico framed Japan as the villain.
Politico’s version: Japan blocked the EU request and refused to join the Russian-asset plan.
Japan’s official version: “No, we did not reject anything — Politico misrepresented our position.”
Politico’s version: Japan blocked the EU request and refused to join the Russian-asset plan.
Japan’s official version: “No, we did not reject anything — Politico misrepresented our position.”
A Japanese municipal assembly member calling for AI-assisted multilingual influence is a rare acknowledgment that:
Japan’s state capacity is insufficient
Japan’s international narrative power is weak
Japan’s state capacity is insufficient
Japan’s international narrative power is weak
December 10, 2025 at 3:30 PM
A Japanese municipal assembly member calling for AI-assisted multilingual influence is a rare acknowledgment that:
Japan’s state capacity is insufficient
Japan’s international narrative power is weak
Japan’s state capacity is insufficient
Japan’s international narrative power is weak
Japan is beginning to recognize that information warfare is not just a military activity — it is a society-wide competition.
China’s mastery of narrative inversion
Japan is only starting to adapt.
China’s mastery of narrative inversion
Japan is only starting to adapt.
December 10, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Japan is beginning to recognize that information warfare is not just a military activity — it is a society-wide competition.
China’s mastery of narrative inversion
Japan is only starting to adapt.
China’s mastery of narrative inversion
Japan is only starting to adapt.
Cruz’s argument is structurally incompatible with Trump’s actual behavior.
It’s like shouting “We must beat China!” while personally delivering the fuel rods to the Chinese reactor.
It’s like shouting “We must beat China!” while personally delivering the fuel rods to the Chinese reactor.
December 10, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Cruz’s argument is structurally incompatible with Trump’s actual behavior.
It’s like shouting “We must beat China!” while personally delivering the fuel rods to the Chinese reactor.
It’s like shouting “We must beat China!” while personally delivering the fuel rods to the Chinese reactor.
—it absolutely triggers that stupid, involuntary “hehehehe” grin reaction.
It’s the geopolitical equivalent of:
“Don’t worry babe, I would never do anything to hurt you.”
(…while holding a suitcase full of AI chips labeled “For PLA Use Only.”)
It’s the geopolitical equivalent of:
“Don’t worry babe, I would never do anything to hurt you.”
(…while holding a suitcase full of AI chips labeled “For PLA Use Only.”)
December 10, 2025 at 10:03 AM
—it absolutely triggers that stupid, involuntary “hehehehe” grin reaction.
It’s the geopolitical equivalent of:
“Don’t worry babe, I would never do anything to hurt you.”
(…while holding a suitcase full of AI chips labeled “For PLA Use Only.”)
It’s the geopolitical equivalent of:
“Don’t worry babe, I would never do anything to hurt you.”
(…while holding a suitcase full of AI chips labeled “For PLA Use Only.”)
Honestly?
Given the entire week of Trump-era chaos, contradictory messaging, and Washington scolding allies while selling H200 to Beijing…
This one clean, unambiguous “Our commitment to Japan is unwavering” line from U.S. State Department is so absurdly out of sync with reality that yes—
Given the entire week of Trump-era chaos, contradictory messaging, and Washington scolding allies while selling H200 to Beijing…
This one clean, unambiguous “Our commitment to Japan is unwavering” line from U.S. State Department is so absurdly out of sync with reality that yes—
December 10, 2025 at 10:02 AM
Honestly?
Given the entire week of Trump-era chaos, contradictory messaging, and Washington scolding allies while selling H200 to Beijing…
This one clean, unambiguous “Our commitment to Japan is unwavering” line from U.S. State Department is so absurdly out of sync with reality that yes—
Given the entire week of Trump-era chaos, contradictory messaging, and Washington scolding allies while selling H200 to Beijing…
This one clean, unambiguous “Our commitment to Japan is unwavering” line from U.S. State Department is so absurdly out of sync with reality that yes—
The Massie Doctrine:
Why contain Russia when you can help it win for free?
LOL
Why contain Russia when you can help it win for free?
LOL
December 10, 2025 at 9:01 AM
The Massie Doctrine:
Why contain Russia when you can help it win for free?
LOL
Why contain Russia when you can help it win for free?
LOL
The Kremlin likely never imagined that the United States would go this far. The proposal itself will lead nowhere, but it may only deepen the sense of frustration and distrust among the allies.
December 10, 2025 at 8:52 AM
The Kremlin likely never imagined that the United States would go this far. The proposal itself will lead nowhere, but it may only deepen the sense of frustration and distrust among the allies.
1/
Why should Japan or the Netherlands take political and economic pain
to block SME exports
when Washington is openly profiting from chip exports?
2/ You cannot outsource deterrence while funding the adversary’s capabilities
This is the contradiction that destroys allied trust.
Why should Japan or the Netherlands take political and economic pain
to block SME exports
when Washington is openly profiting from chip exports?
2/ You cannot outsource deterrence while funding the adversary’s capabilities
This is the contradiction that destroys allied trust.
December 10, 2025 at 6:49 AM
1/
Why should Japan or the Netherlands take political and economic pain
to block SME exports
when Washington is openly profiting from chip exports?
2/ You cannot outsource deterrence while funding the adversary’s capabilities
This is the contradiction that destroys allied trust.
Why should Japan or the Netherlands take political and economic pain
to block SME exports
when Washington is openly profiting from chip exports?
2/ You cannot outsource deterrence while funding the adversary’s capabilities
This is the contradiction that destroys allied trust.
The NYT keeps asking whether the U.S. military is ready for war with China over Taiwan.
But Washington has offered no indication it would actually fight such a war.
So why not ask the real question?
How does Taiwan defend itself in a world where U.S. intervention is uncertain?
But Washington has offered no indication it would actually fight such a war.
So why not ask the real question?
How does Taiwan defend itself in a world where U.S. intervention is uncertain?
December 10, 2025 at 1:36 AM
The NYT keeps asking whether the U.S. military is ready for war with China over Taiwan.
But Washington has offered no indication it would actually fight such a war.
So why not ask the real question?
How does Taiwan defend itself in a world where U.S. intervention is uncertain?
But Washington has offered no indication it would actually fight such a war.
So why not ask the real question?
How does Taiwan defend itself in a world where U.S. intervention is uncertain?
Global fund managers aren’t predicting a Chinese economic recovery — they’re begging for one.
They’re not bullish on China; they’re bullish on the idea that Beijing won’t wreck their trade again.
They’re not bullish on China; they’re bullish on the idea that Beijing won’t wreck their trade again.
December 9, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Global fund managers aren’t predicting a Chinese economic recovery — they’re begging for one.
They’re not bullish on China; they’re bullish on the idea that Beijing won’t wreck their trade again.
They’re not bullish on China; they’re bullish on the idea that Beijing won’t wreck their trade again.
This is delegated deterrence + subsidized adversary modernization — a formula that cannot coexist in any sane national-security doctrine.
December 9, 2025 at 10:21 PM
This is delegated deterrence + subsidized adversary modernization — a formula that cannot coexist in any sane national-security doctrine.
December 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM