Edoardo Vaccari
@edoardovaccari.bsky.social
44 followers 64 following 7 posts
PhD candidate @lsehistory - Intellectual history of Socialism and Federalism in mid century Europe - @unibo & @columbia alumnus
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
edoardovaccari.bsky.social
Giorgia Meloni dismissed the Ventotene Manifesto as a socialist relic. The left rushed to defend it but both sides risk distorting its meaning. I wrote for The Conversation about the political struggle over one of Europe’s most contested historical texts theconversation.com/ventotene-ma...
Ventotene manifesto: why European politicians are arguing over a 1941 document written by a group of imprisoned Italian antifascists
As European nations discuss closer defence collaboration, a document proposing a federal Europe has become the subject of heated arguments.
theconversation.com
Reposted by Edoardo Vaccari
mmagency.bsky.social
SO excited to announce that INVISIBLE RIVALS by the brilliant @jonathanrgoodman.bsky.social publishes today!

'Working across philosophy, evolutionary biology, public policy, and politics, Invisible Rivals is unlike any other book I’ve read.’ - Devi Sridhar
Reposted by Edoardo Vaccari
history-thought.bsky.social
Our next panel is architecture and the state with papers from Thomas Griffiths (KCL), Bene Colenbrander (EUI) and Eli Frankel (Chicago).
Reposted by Edoardo Vaccari
history-thought.bsky.social
We're very pleased to announce the programme for this year's conference on States and Spaces!

The conference will be held at LSE on 19 and 20 June.
Please sign up here for your free ticket - www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/16th-annua...
edoardovaccari.bsky.social
Giorgia Meloni dismissed the Ventotene Manifesto as a socialist relic. The left rushed to defend it but both sides risk distorting its meaning. I wrote for The Conversation about the political struggle over one of Europe’s most contested historical texts theconversation.com/ventotene-ma...
Ventotene manifesto: why European politicians are arguing over a 1941 document written by a group of imprisoned Italian antifascists
As European nations discuss closer defence collaboration, a document proposing a federal Europe has become the subject of heated arguments.
theconversation.com
Reposted by Edoardo Vaccari
edoardovaccari.bsky.social
Join us this Wednesday at Senate House for the first History of Political Ideas/Early Career Seminar of 2025!

We're thrilled to welcome Chris Cooper-Davies (Oxford) as our speaker.

Sign up here: www.history.ac.uk/events/moham...

@ihr.bsky.social
Mohamad Jawad Chirri, the Lebanese Diaspora in North America, and the Politics of Global Shi’ism Before 1979
www.history.ac.uk
edoardovaccari.bsky.social
True, it's probably dated, but the main argument remains cogent and well worth engaging with. As for Lynn Hunt, I suspect Moyn would share your view 😅
edoardovaccari.bsky.social
@samuelmoyn.bsky.social 's piece tackles 'the wall between history and philosophy' as the ultimate frontier to breach—a bold and intriguing challenge that historians must confront www.thenation.com/article/arch...
Bonfire of the Humanities
Historians are losing their audience, and searching for the next trend won’t win it back.
www.thenation.com
Reposted by Edoardo Vaccari
benjthomas.bsky.social
I’m thrilled to see that my first article, 'Britain’s Whiz Kids' is finally out in British Politics. I’d love to tell you more about what you can find in the article. 🧵
In brief: managerialism was introduced to Britain in the 1960-70s through the CPRS and PAR, not the 1980s.
doi.org/10.1057/s412...
Britain’s whiz kids: the PAR, CPRS and managerialism in Britain in the 1960s and 1970s
Benjamin Thomas
Abstract: Recent scholarship on managerialism in the United States has identified an alternative genealogy for concepts commonly associated with neoliberalism. This article uses this new lens and original historical research to re-evaluate two British administrative institutions from the 1970s, the Central Policy Review Staff (CPRS) and Programme Analysis and Review (PAR). Building on the existing literature on managerialism in Britain, the article argues for a revised periodisation that understands the CPRS and PAR as not just ill-fated administrative reforms, but rather as part of an early and largely successful attempt to import managerialist ideas into British public administration. This new analysis provides a more accurate account of these reforms and improves understanding of the actors, institutions and ideas behind the introduction of managerialism. The article frames managerialism as part of a wider political agenda, reflected in both privatisation and civil service reform, not a mere technocratic exercise. The active politicisation of these reforms in Britain had profound implications for the future of British governance.