Don’t lie to journalists, might be another…
February 1, 2026 at 3:56 PM
Don’t lie to journalists, might be another…
You may be right. Some data would be helpful.
January 26, 2026 at 2:14 PM
You may be right. Some data would be helpful.
It’s not really the same, is it? Both actions unlawful etc, but most people in Venezuela opposed Maduro’s murderous and
Illegitimate government. They’ll
be delighted to see the back of him, if not the manner of his removal.
Illegitimate government. They’ll
be delighted to see the back of him, if not the manner of his removal.
January 3, 2026 at 6:05 PM
It’s not really the same, is it? Both actions unlawful etc, but most people in Venezuela opposed Maduro’s murderous and
Illegitimate government. They’ll
be delighted to see the back of him, if not the manner of his removal.
Illegitimate government. They’ll
be delighted to see the back of him, if not the manner of his removal.
Excellent book. Quaint times in comparison, though…
January 3, 2026 at 5:15 PM
Excellent book. Quaint times in comparison, though…
Plenty of people in rural areas, including farmers, voted Labour. Many for the first time. The tax on family farms was seen as a huge betrayal. Even with this u turn I doubt the votes will come back.
December 23, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Plenty of people in rural areas, including farmers, voted Labour. Many for the first time. The tax on family farms was seen as a huge betrayal. Even with this u turn I doubt the votes will come back.
Texas, California et al, heading back to Mexico soon, presumably?
December 17, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Texas, California et al, heading back to Mexico soon, presumably?
Or, only one in four republicans thinks it’s not ok to extrajudicially kill people who may or may not be involved in drug trafficking…
November 14, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Or, only one in four republicans thinks it’s not ok to extrajudicially kill people who may or may not be involved in drug trafficking…
Am sick of seeing Jonathan Gullis. He’s not a national MP and this isn’t Kidsgrove.
August 19, 2025 at 10:41 AM
Am sick of seeing Jonathan Gullis. He’s not a national MP and this isn’t Kidsgrove.
I don’t think JB would describe himself as transphobic. Is the Supreme Court ‘transphobic’ in your view? Is it reasonable to agree that biological sex is immutable?
August 13, 2025 at 10:36 AM
I don’t think JB would describe himself as transphobic. Is the Supreme Court ‘transphobic’ in your view? Is it reasonable to agree that biological sex is immutable?
Perhaps you’d be taken more seriously if you weren’t so ad hominem abusive (correct use?).
August 12, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Perhaps you’d be taken more seriously if you weren’t so ad hominem abusive (correct use?).
Actually, it does.
August 12, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Actually, it does.
It’s the court, not the government. Court obvs take science into account.
August 12, 2025 at 5:28 PM
It’s the court, not the government. Court obvs take science into account.
The problem is, who needs enemies
when generally perfectly reasonable trans men and women have you lot
supposedly defending their interests. It’s as if the Faragist right and the Russians are funding a bunch of bots. Oh wait a minute..
when generally perfectly reasonable trans men and women have you lot
supposedly defending their interests. It’s as if the Faragist right and the Russians are funding a bunch of bots. Oh wait a minute..
August 12, 2025 at 4:25 PM
The problem is, who needs enemies
when generally perfectly reasonable trans men and women have you lot
supposedly defending their interests. It’s as if the Faragist right and the Russians are funding a bunch of bots. Oh wait a minute..
when generally perfectly reasonable trans men and women have you lot
supposedly defending their interests. It’s as if the Faragist right and the Russians are funding a bunch of bots. Oh wait a minute..
So you’re on board with the Supreme Court judgement or do you know better too?
August 12, 2025 at 4:21 PM
So you’re on board with the Supreme Court judgement or do you know better too?
Just a bit of a dim witted rubbish one, that didn’t really mean anything.
August 12, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Just a bit of a dim witted rubbish one, that didn’t really mean anything.
Er, no. Just think the insults are boring and pointless. Not sure what anti semitism got to do with anything.
August 12, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Er, no. Just think the insults are boring and pointless. Not sure what anti semitism got to do with anything.
I guess, possibly given I really don’t understand what that means!
August 12, 2025 at 3:26 PM
I guess, possibly given I really don’t understand what that means!
Holocaust revisionist? Really?
Or did he write a novel with some literary license? You think his intent was to misrepresent the holocaust? I doubt that.
Or did he write a novel with some literary license? You think his intent was to misrepresent the holocaust? I doubt that.
August 12, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Holocaust revisionist? Really?
Or did he write a novel with some literary license? You think his intent was to misrepresent the holocaust? I doubt that.
Or did he write a novel with some literary license? You think his intent was to misrepresent the holocaust? I doubt that.
A legal definition of biological fact. Agree crowds can be wrong, although I don’t think the general view is in this case.
August 12, 2025 at 3:19 PM
A legal definition of biological fact. Agree crowds can be wrong, although I don’t think the general view is in this case.
So you do think you know better than the Supreme Court - and the wisdom of crowds/the bleeding obvious? I don’t go in for the ad hominem insults but was that your inner misogynist talking?
August 12, 2025 at 2:53 PM
So you do think you know better than the Supreme Court - and the wisdom of crowds/the bleeding obvious? I don’t go in for the ad hominem insults but was that your inner misogynist talking?