Edward Swaine
@edswaine.bsky.social
8.2K followers 820 following 150 posts
Law professor. Personal account, personal views only. Vonnegut's one rule: you've got to be kind.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
edswaine.bsky.social
pretty typical for a HOA
edswaine.bsky.social
they said the program has 12 steps, but 7 has two components, so it's 13, and they're not really "steps" per se
edswaine.bsky.social
it destroyed Herman's Hermits
edswaine.bsky.social
to be fair, his part is on food deserts and existentialism
edswaine.bsky.social
Awesome idea. Some comment bubbles should concern footnotes, meaning that they sit in the margins as rootless as clouds, with an equal number asking why bubbles don't work within footnotes.
edswaine.bsky.social
rare to see someone fall twice on a play before falling a third time for a score
edswaine.bsky.social
on the Tiffany network no less
edswaine.bsky.social
it's small consolation, but I just got great Xmas tree skirts on ebay.ca
edswaine.bsky.social
Re-upping these questions from @tessbridgeman.bsky.social & Mary McCord. Note that the subsequent CNN story on the classified OLC memo does not report whether the memo was prepared before the recent strikes, which is one of the questions posed.
edswaine.bsky.social
Valuable questions, terrific format -- ideally reaching Senate staff.
tessbridgeman.bsky.social
Mary McCord, former Acting Assistant AG for National Security, and I teamed up on Qs Senators should ask #Bondi at her Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, on strikes that have killed 17 people to date.

The implications are serious. Consider a few of the Qs:

www.justsecurity.org/121862/ask-b...
edswaine.bsky.social
Sorry, I was thinking of Bevo.
edswaine.bsky.social
Dead?!?!?!?! That's terrible, but I suppose he'll be put to good use.
edswaine.bsky.social
I say this fondly, and with a daguerreotype on my profile
edswaine.bsky.social
professor / his faculty profile picture / his self-image
ryanbeckwith.bsky.social
Editor in chief, city editor, features editor
edswaine.bsky.social
If I understand, numerous dissents -- and many decisions overturning lower court decisions, and briefs urging that -- are implicitly accusing an erring judge of committing illegal insurrection, subject to punishment of being barred from holding any office under the United States.
matthewstiegler.bsky.social
❗❗❗

Stephen Miller: "It's simply a factually accurate statement that when a judge assumes for him- or herself the powers that have been relegated or delegated by the Constitution to the president, that that is a form of illegal insurrection." ...
atrupar.com
Q: You called the judge's ruling 'legal insurrection.' Are you recommending the president take action against judges who rule against him?

STEPHEN MILLER: No. It's simply a factually accurate statement
edswaine.bsky.social
"Generals aren't thinking about how to annhilate all of humanity by triggering an all-out nuclear war. That's just not how our minds work. Now, Skynet . . ."
atrupar.com
Dr Oz: "We have an advantage with AI. You know why? We don't think the way fraudsters think. That's just not what our minds do. The bank managers don't think about bank fraud. They want to do loans and help businesses. Fraudsters think about fraud. So the AI can think the way a fraudster thinks."
edswaine.bsky.social
Texas regents welcome being among the select few who might (or might not!) be paid for surrendering traditional state prerogatives over tuition, admissions, and higher education generally.

Gadsden 2.0: "they could have trodden anywhere, and they chose us!"
NYT, Oct 2, 2025
edswaine.bsky.social
I think the average communist or terrorist would heartily favor that
Reposted by Edward Swaine
edswaine.bsky.social
the ghosts of Lieutenant Calley and Captain Medina, still nearby, lean forward attentively
atrupar.com
Trump: "The problem with Vietnam, we, you know, we stopped fighting to win. We would've won easy. We would've won Afghanistan easy. We would've won every war easy. But we got politically correct. 'Oh, let's take it easy.' We're not politically correct anymore, just so you understand."
edswaine.bsky.social
great, now Torquemada's over there putting me on blast
edswaine.bsky.social
NYT: experts -- of all faiths! -- think this is bad, far worse than expected

Reader: interesting, at least people rethinking their priors

Bluesky: what idiot didn't expect the Spanish inquisition
edswaine.bsky.social
NYT: experts -- of all faiths! -- think this is bad, far worse than expected

Reader: interesting, at least people rethinking their priors

Bluesky: what idiot didn't expect the Spanish inquisition
edswaine.bsky.social
The group was designed to be 50/50 Democrats and Republicans. IMHO, not surprising that some disposed to have supported a R candidate, or in all events not to have actively supported a D candidate, would view things as worse than their prior selves imagined.
edswaine.bsky.social
I'm less confident that the surveyed individuals are most people the NYT treats as legal experts. And less surprised, maybe, that a 50/50 bipartisan pool would have been relatively sanguine, and in any case interested in the comparison. IMHO, the story is useful beyond its broad evidentiary value.
edswaine.bsky.social
Respectfully disagree. There's obviously an interesting story in comparing the same group's views before and after. If that group were somehow the only people the NYT ever consulted, fine.
edswaine.bsky.social
the ghosts of Lieutenant Calley and Captain Medina, still nearby, lean forward attentively
atrupar.com
Trump: "The problem with Vietnam, we, you know, we stopped fighting to win. We would've won easy. We would've won Afghanistan easy. We would've won every war easy. But we got politically correct. 'Oh, let's take it easy.' We're not politically correct anymore, just so you understand."