Eduardo Silva🇪🇺
@eduardosilvalopez.bsky.social
EN/DE/ES - History, geopolitics, philosophy, religion, new technologies. Humanist, left-wing liberal, militant Atheist.
https://www.instagram.com/eduardo.silva.lopez/
https://www.instagram.com/eduardo.silva.lopez/
Hum...
This is not about a discussion in the internet. The question is if both leaders do literally denounce both things. I did not quite well understand. Yes or no?
Europe is now rearming, BTW.
Regards.
This is not about a discussion in the internet. The question is if both leaders do literally denounce both things. I did not quite well understand. Yes or no?
Europe is now rearming, BTW.
Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Hum...
This is not about a discussion in the internet. The question is if both leaders do literally denounce both things. I did not quite well understand. Yes or no?
Europe is now rearming, BTW.
Regards.
This is not about a discussion in the internet. The question is if both leaders do literally denounce both things. I did not quite well understand. Yes or no?
Europe is now rearming, BTW.
Regards.
Please stop.
1. It is annoying, every day the same post. Sorry 🤷♂️.
2. He is not guilty of that, because of "widespread". Compare his actions with the actions of people actually convicted. Compare the scale.
He is a murderer. This - yes.
1. It is annoying, every day the same post. Sorry 🤷♂️.
2. He is not guilty of that, because of "widespread". Compare his actions with the actions of people actually convicted. Compare the scale.
He is a murderer. This - yes.
December 4, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Interesting reasoning. But:
1. The world has not been under the rulership of democracy for decades.
2. The last decades have seen remarkable increases in human development, despite the problems.
3. The experience we have with 'no gov' is rather disasterful.
1. The world has not been under the rulership of democracy for decades.
2. The last decades have seen remarkable increases in human development, despite the problems.
3. The experience we have with 'no gov' is rather disasterful.
December 4, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Interesting reasoning. But:
1. The world has not been under the rulership of democracy for decades.
2. The last decades have seen remarkable increases in human development, despite the problems.
3. The experience we have with 'no gov' is rather disasterful.
1. The world has not been under the rulership of democracy for decades.
2. The last decades have seen remarkable increases in human development, despite the problems.
3. The experience we have with 'no gov' is rather disasterful.
Thank you very much!
Can I keep asking?
I take it none of them has denounced MAGA as a form of fascism and Trumps administration as an attempt
of coup against America's democracy and republic... correct?
Has any Democrat leader done this?
Can I keep asking?
I take it none of them has denounced MAGA as a form of fascism and Trumps administration as an attempt
of coup against America's democracy and republic... correct?
Has any Democrat leader done this?
December 4, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Thank you very much!
Can I keep asking?
I take it none of them has denounced MAGA as a form of fascism and Trumps administration as an attempt
of coup against America's democracy and republic... correct?
Has any Democrat leader done this?
Can I keep asking?
I take it none of them has denounced MAGA as a form of fascism and Trumps administration as an attempt
of coup against America's democracy and republic... correct?
Has any Democrat leader done this?
Ok, let me explain. I am a German. I live in Berlin. I have not the slightest idea about who are Schumer or Jeffries.
If you are able and willing to give some kind of explanation of the position of the OP, I would be interested.
If not, I salute you, farewell.
If you are able and willing to give some kind of explanation of the position of the OP, I would be interested.
If not, I salute you, farewell.
December 4, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Ok, let me explain. I am a German. I live in Berlin. I have not the slightest idea about who are Schumer or Jeffries.
If you are able and willing to give some kind of explanation of the position of the OP, I would be interested.
If not, I salute you, farewell.
If you are able and willing to give some kind of explanation of the position of the OP, I would be interested.
If not, I salute you, farewell.
I just want to respectfully indicate that I do not understand your post. It feels like it needs reformulation or punctuation signs, but maybe it's just me, English is my 4th language. Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 3:32 PM
I just want to respectfully indicate that I do not understand your post. It feels like it needs reformulation or punctuation signs, but maybe it's just me, English is my 4th language. Regards.
I have no idea, sir. But if you have some reasoning for this, I am curious.
December 4, 2025 at 1:55 PM
I have no idea, sir. But if you have some reasoning for this, I am curious.
PS: I hope you read the rest.
December 4, 2025 at 1:35 PM
PS: I hope you read the rest.
Hello.
He does have instincts. I am not supposing any understanding of military strategy on Trump. Just instincts.
The same instincts which told them to get out of Afghanistan as fast as possible.
Regards.
He does have instincts. I am not supposing any understanding of military strategy on Trump. Just instincts.
The same instincts which told them to get out of Afghanistan as fast as possible.
Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Hello.
He does have instincts. I am not supposing any understanding of military strategy on Trump. Just instincts.
The same instincts which told them to get out of Afghanistan as fast as possible.
Regards.
He does have instincts. I am not supposing any understanding of military strategy on Trump. Just instincts.
The same instincts which told them to get out of Afghanistan as fast as possible.
Regards.
changing the regime this way and thus please both the US oil industry as well as Marco Rubio's Florida radical electorate.
As if that has ever worked 🤷♂️.
But no full, real war.
Regards.
As if that has ever worked 🤷♂️.
But no full, real war.
Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 1:20 PM
changing the regime this way and thus please both the US oil industry as well as Marco Rubio's Florida radical electorate.
As if that has ever worked 🤷♂️.
But no full, real war.
Regards.
As if that has ever worked 🤷♂️.
But no full, real war.
Regards.
madness from a logistical / professional POV, it goes also against his deepest instincts. His guts would shout "Vietnam! Afghanistan!". And this time they would be right.
What is *may* indeed be planning is a bombing offensive, no boots on the ground. With the delusional target of➡️
What is *may* indeed be planning is a bombing offensive, no boots on the ground. With the delusional target of➡️
December 4, 2025 at 1:20 PM
madness from a logistical / professional POV, it goes also against his deepest instincts. His guts would shout "Vietnam! Afghanistan!". And this time they would be right.
What is *may* indeed be planning is a bombing offensive, no boots on the ground. With the delusional target of➡️
What is *may* indeed be planning is a bombing offensive, no boots on the ground. With the delusional target of➡️
Hello. I am a bit afraid to writing you. Please be assured that I am an anti-fascist, left-wing liberal *in Europe*. This accounts for a radical left in the USA, even if no socialist.
But... no, he does not want war. He is not moving the troops for a real invasion, and not only would that be➡️
But... no, he does not want war. He is not moving the troops for a real invasion, and not only would that be➡️
December 4, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Hello. I am a bit afraid to writing you. Please be assured that I am an anti-fascist, left-wing liberal *in Europe*. This accounts for a radical left in the USA, even if no socialist.
But... no, he does not want war. He is not moving the troops for a real invasion, and not only would that be➡️
But... no, he does not want war. He is not moving the troops for a real invasion, and not only would that be➡️
Truth be told, Maduro's regime is indefensible ️and thus considered a politically easy target.
My opinion only. Have a nice day.
My opinion only. Have a nice day.
December 4, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Truth be told, Maduro's regime is indefensible ️and thus considered a politically easy target.
My opinion only. Have a nice day.
My opinion only. Have a nice day.
in the USA shows that you are right on the point, that this is not about drugs.
My personal guessing is that this is just another distraction for Trump (Epstein case), and a service to the most radical Floridan electorate for Marco Rubio. ➡
My personal guessing is that this is just another distraction for Trump (Epstein case), and a service to the most radical Floridan electorate for Marco Rubio. ➡
December 4, 2025 at 1:07 PM
in the USA shows that you are right on the point, that this is not about drugs.
My personal guessing is that this is just another distraction for Trump (Epstein case), and a service to the most radical Floridan electorate for Marco Rubio. ➡
My personal guessing is that this is just another distraction for Trump (Epstein case), and a service to the most radical Floridan electorate for Marco Rubio. ➡
even if this is extremely improbable to succeed. But you are right, they could be acting under this delusion, similar to WWII "bombing London / Berlin will bring them to rebel and force their governments to surrender".
This administration pardoning a drug dealer who introduced 400 tons of cocaine ➡
This administration pardoning a drug dealer who introduced 400 tons of cocaine ➡
December 4, 2025 at 1:07 PM
even if this is extremely improbable to succeed. But you are right, they could be acting under this delusion, similar to WWII "bombing London / Berlin will bring them to rebel and force their governments to surrender".
This administration pardoning a drug dealer who introduced 400 tons of cocaine ➡
This administration pardoning a drug dealer who introduced 400 tons of cocaine ➡
Hello, @godlessdoc.bsky.social :
There will be no invasion IMHO, the logistics do not match for that and it would go against the most basic instincts of this administration *and* against military common sense.
The target *could* be an attempt to topple the regime via bombings to get the oil, ➡️
There will be no invasion IMHO, the logistics do not match for that and it would go against the most basic instincts of this administration *and* against military common sense.
The target *could* be an attempt to topple the regime via bombings to get the oil, ➡️
December 4, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Hello, @godlessdoc.bsky.social :
There will be no invasion IMHO, the logistics do not match for that and it would go against the most basic instincts of this administration *and* against military common sense.
The target *could* be an attempt to topple the regime via bombings to get the oil, ➡️
There will be no invasion IMHO, the logistics do not match for that and it would go against the most basic instincts of this administration *and* against military common sense.
The target *could* be an attempt to topple the regime via bombings to get the oil, ➡️
5. It does not look realistic that the US Navy with all its resources could not stop them without lethal force. Threaten first. Use drones. Target the engines. And so on. There was zero necessity to kill them.
My opinion only.
Have a nice day.
My opinion only.
Have a nice day.
December 4, 2025 at 1:03 PM
5. It does not look realistic that the US Navy with all its resources could not stop them without lethal force. Threaten first. Use drones. Target the engines. And so on. There was zero necessity to kill them.
My opinion only.
Have a nice day.
My opinion only.
Have a nice day.
Marco Rubio himself said they were sailing first to Trinidad. After that, is anyone's guess.
4. If we consider it an act of war, the target is the combatants, and we suspect a war crime, if it is not, it is murder from the beginning and for all 80 killed people, as there is no due process.
➡️
4. If we consider it an act of war, the target is the combatants, and we suspect a war crime, if it is not, it is murder from the beginning and for all 80 killed people, as there is no due process.
➡️
December 4, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Marco Rubio himself said they were sailing first to Trinidad. After that, is anyone's guess.
4. If we consider it an act of war, the target is the combatants, and we suspect a war crime, if it is not, it is murder from the beginning and for all 80 killed people, as there is no due process.
➡️
4. If we consider it an act of war, the target is the combatants, and we suspect a war crime, if it is not, it is murder from the beginning and for all 80 killed people, as there is no due process.
➡️
Hello, @ernestoenojado.bsky.social.
With all respect:
1. "Kill them all". The target was the people.
2. There is no proof they were drug dealers at all.
3. The less that the drugs were for the USA and not Europe - from Venezuela few to no fentanyl goes there, it is cocaine, and for Europe. ➡️
With all respect:
1. "Kill them all". The target was the people.
2. There is no proof they were drug dealers at all.
3. The less that the drugs were for the USA and not Europe - from Venezuela few to no fentanyl goes there, it is cocaine, and for Europe. ➡️
December 4, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Hello, @ernestoenojado.bsky.social.
With all respect:
1. "Kill them all". The target was the people.
2. There is no proof they were drug dealers at all.
3. The less that the drugs were for the USA and not Europe - from Venezuela few to no fentanyl goes there, it is cocaine, and for Europe. ➡️
With all respect:
1. "Kill them all". The target was the people.
2. There is no proof they were drug dealers at all.
3. The less that the drugs were for the USA and not Europe - from Venezuela few to no fentanyl goes there, it is cocaine, and for Europe. ➡️
Hello.
Yes, there are similarities, even if also differences.
I wonder why you wrote this as reply of my postings, but yes, there are similarities.
Regards.
Yes, there are similarities, even if also differences.
I wonder why you wrote this as reply of my postings, but yes, there are similarities.
Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Hello.
Yes, there are similarities, even if also differences.
I wonder why you wrote this as reply of my postings, but yes, there are similarities.
Regards.
Yes, there are similarities, even if also differences.
I wonder why you wrote this as reply of my postings, but yes, there are similarities.
Regards.
I do not understand your answer, I am sorry 🤷🏻♂️. Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 2:33 AM
I do not understand your answer, I am sorry 🤷🏻♂️. Regards.
*who has won literally
December 4, 2025 at 2:32 AM
*who has won literally
John Stuart Mill. I have the impression you have a different concept of 'liberal' than political science and philosophy. Did you mean "uneducated economic wannabe neoliberal", also known as "yuppy", maybe? Or anarcho-capitalist?
Regards.
Regards.
December 4, 2025 at 2:30 AM
John Stuart Mill. I have the impression you have a different concept of 'liberal' than political science and philosophy. Did you mean "uneducated economic wannabe neoliberal", also known as "yuppy", maybe? Or anarcho-capitalist?
Regards.
Regards.
4. I know rich people who still are normal and relatable. Some, personally.
5. I know no-one who as won loterally everything, but greedy egoists should simply be handled with a good tax system.
With all fue respect, I fail to see how anything you wrote has anything to do with 'On Libery' of ➡️
5. I know no-one who as won loterally everything, but greedy egoists should simply be handled with a good tax system.
With all fue respect, I fail to see how anything you wrote has anything to do with 'On Libery' of ➡️
December 4, 2025 at 2:30 AM
4. I know rich people who still are normal and relatable. Some, personally.
5. I know no-one who as won loterally everything, but greedy egoists should simply be handled with a good tax system.
With all fue respect, I fail to see how anything you wrote has anything to do with 'On Libery' of ➡️
5. I know no-one who as won loterally everything, but greedy egoists should simply be handled with a good tax system.
With all fue respect, I fail to see how anything you wrote has anything to do with 'On Libery' of ➡️
insufficient. There are for sure one hundred rich people who like pizza with bananas. Still prolly not most of them.
2. Same as above, but I defend a mathematically progressive wealth tax which would in time make billionaires non-existent.
3. See above.
➡️
2. Same as above, but I defend a mathematically progressive wealth tax which would in time make billionaires non-existent.
3. See above.
➡️
December 4, 2025 at 2:30 AM
insufficient. There are for sure one hundred rich people who like pizza with bananas. Still prolly not most of them.
2. Same as above, but I defend a mathematically progressive wealth tax which would in time make billionaires non-existent.
3. See above.
➡️
2. Same as above, but I defend a mathematically progressive wealth tax which would in time make billionaires non-existent.
3. See above.
➡️