But how long can Elon Musk keep running on air? Potentially quite a long time. The post Tesla’s Wile E. Coyote Moment Is Here appeared first on The American Prospect.

Today thirty-four members of the Oklahoma state legislature petitioned the Oklahoma Supreme Court to block the upload of information from all Oklahoma drivers licenses and ID cards to the SPEXS national REAL-ID database operated by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA). The petitioners, led by Sen. Kendal Sacchieri (R-Blanchard), include sixteen members of the Oklahoma Senate and eighteen members of the Oklahoma House of Representatives. They are represented by Oklahoma City attorney Wyatt McGuire. Service Oklahoma, the agency that issues drivers licenses and state ID cards, plans an initial bulk upload of data about all Oklahomans to the SPEXS database over the Presidents’ Day weekend of February 14-16, 2026, unless the upload is blocked by the state Supreme Court or suspended or postponed by Service Oklahoma or Gov. Kevin Stitt. The state legislature convenes for its next session February 2nd, and multiple steps are required before a bill can be enacted. Unless the bulk upload to SPEXS is cancelled or postponed, it will take place just before the legislature can take any action to stop it. We don’t know whether the upload was scheduled deliberately to preempt the possibility of legislative oversight. But we’ve seen the same pattern in other states where governors and/or driver licensing agencies arranged to join the the SPEXS database and the misleading-named “State to State” (S2S) network — in which data is transmitted through AAMVA, not directly between states — just before the start of a session at which the legislature might have questioned or taken action to stop the upload. In Alaska, for example, the Department of Administration carried out its initial bulk upload of state residents’ data to SPEXS over the weekend of January 28, 2017, just days after the start of the legislative session and just before hearings were scheduled on legislation to block the upload. Like many other states, Oklahoma offers residents a choice of a REAL-ID Act “compliant” or “non-compliant” drivers license or state ID card. Many people choose a “noncompliant” license or ID specifically because they want their data kept in-state. Sen. Sacchieri introduced a resolution in the Oklahoma state legislature last year to reaffirm that information about Oklahoma residents who apply for a drivers license or ID that doesn’t comply with the REAL-ID Act may not be sent out of state or to the national REAL-ID database. But that bill didn’t get a vote in 2025, and any action by the state legislature in 2026 won’t take effect until after the planned February 14-16 upload. As the legislators point out in their brief to the state Supreme Court, Oklahoma law, 47 O.S. § 6-110.3a(A)(C), already prohibits sharing personal information about drivers license or ID card applicants except as required by the REAL-ID Act. As the legislators also point out, the Federal REAL-ID Act does not (and cannot) require states to take any action. Whether to “comply” is a choice for each state to make. Once personal information is uploaded to SPEXS, it is out of the state’s control. The Federal government could use a subpoena or other legal process to order AMMVA, as a private entity, to hand over SPEXS data and not to disclose the subpoena to the state. No state that participates in SPEXS can really know whether AAMVA has already chosen or been compelled to hand over data about its residents to Federal agencies, or for what purposes. The thirty-four Oklahoma state legislators joining the petition have asked the state Supreme Court to stay and temporarily enjoin the upload of Okahomans’ data to SPEXS pending consideration of their lawsuit. Their complaint is rooted in the separation of powers and the authority of the legislature: No Oklahoma law authorizes the upload, no funds have been appropriated for it, and it contravenes the intent of the legislature as expressed in current Oklahoma law. The fact pattern in Oklahoma is typical of what has happened in other states that have uploaded their residents’ personal information to SPEXS without advertising their plans or seeking explicit legislative authorization or funding for joining the national database. After we were the first to report on the SPEXS database, AAMVA removed the specifications for the database from their public website, and threatened to sue us to get us to take down the legal copy of the specifications we had posted. AAMVA is a private entity with no legal authority, but it acts like a lawless, rogue government agency. What AAMVA and its Federal and state allies fear most is informed public debate and legislative oversight. We look forward to a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court that will allow the Oklahoma legislature time to exercise oversight over Service Oklahoma and encourage legislators in other states to exercise their rightful authority over state agencies’ relations with AAMVA.

It could have been me or any one of my colleagues, but this time it was Alex Pretti RN.

"Your Ring camera is an ICE agent." The post Fury as Amazon Ring Cameras Are Hooked Up to ICE System appeared first on Futurism.

The MLTF worked with peace, civil liberties, and privacy organizations to submit joint comments to the Selective Service System (SSS) objecting to an SSS proposal for new and expanded “routine uses” of SSS registration data. The requirement for young men to register with the SSS for a possible military draft will end in December 2026. But Congress has chosen to give the SSS a second chance. Over the course of this year, the SSS will be putting in place the regulatory and administrative framework for a new and certain to fail attempt to register potential draftees automatically [sic] on the basis of other existing Federal databases, starting when the “self-registration” requirement ends in December 2026. Attempted automatic registration is the largest change to the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) and U.S. planning and preparation for a draft since 1980. To implement this change in the law, the SSS will need to promulgate new regulations and a series of notices and requests for approval pursuant to Federal laws governing data collection (Paperwork Reduction Act), data sharing (Computer Matching Act) and data use (Privacy Act). That process is just beginning, but will need to be complete by December 2026. The MLTF is monitoring and plans to participate in these administrative proceedings. See the upcoming edition of _On Watch_ for what’s happening with the transition to “automatic” draft registration and the opportunities for MLTF members and other lawyers and legal workers to help. The SSS has a track record of disregard for data protection laws, and is under pressure to expand the misuse of registration data. DOGE has already been given access to the SSS registration database for undisclosed purposes and with no apparent legal basis. The Heritage Foundation wants to weaponize SSS registration data against immigrants by using threats of prosecution for “knowing and willful” non-registration to pressure immigrants to “self-deport”, even though those threats are empty in the absence of evidence of notice and actual knowledge of the registration requirement. The first official SSS rule-making action after the change to “automatic” registration was enacted was a proposal to expand the disclosure of SSS registration records to other Federal, state, and local agencies and private entities for a range of purposes including immigration enforcement. This isn’t overtly related to preparations for “automatic” registration, but is a precursor to the SSS notices and changes in rules that it will require. The comments submitted January 16th in opposition to this SSS proposal for expanded data sharing were co-signed by the MLTF, Jewish C.O. Project, Restore the Fourth (RT4), Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Committee Opposed to Militarism and the Draft (COMD), Project on Youth and Non-Military Opportunities (Project YANO), Episcopal Peace Fellowship (EPF), and Center on Conscience & War (CCW). This is a promising start toward a joint campaign against “automatic” draft registration — with all the dangers it poses as a data grab and an enabler of war planning — and for repeal of the MSSA and Selective Service. We invite peace, civil liberties, and privacy advocates to join us in this work.