can we save those discussions for the tribunals?

1. that would imply there are more articles with headlines that sum it up - where are they?
2. yes the article is not only positive, or it would be too easy to dismiss even by rubes such as yourself. but it leaves out plenty, like ICE regularly operating illegally, CECOT, MAHA…
archive.is/5hE1V

no. it's *the* headline. also, the problem is in the lead, not the headline.

is there any musk prediction/promise from the last 10 years that became true?

ironically, most AI critics seem to have a knowledge cutoff date somewhere in 2023.

it says "free battery replacement" though?

yes. sending a large, unreviewable PR is bad form no matter how it was created but especially if it's "generated".
at least there should be an initial PR that adds a test suite ^^
simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/18/...

in german:
to fall asleep: "einschlafen" (lit. "sleep in")
to wake up "aufwachen" (lit. "wake open")
but to sleep in is "ausschlafen" (lit. "sleep out") 🤯

mögen sie alle den weg ihres vorbilds charlie kirk gehen.

reading the "X" like an "✕" brand collaboration

es gilt das gleiche wie für code: lass dir helfen wie du willst aber sei verantwortlich für das ergebnis
simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/18/...