Creature in the treELIne
@elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
440 followers 360 following 910 posts
Associate Prof. of Physics & Astro at USC, running Levenson-Falk Lab and studying all things quantum with superconducting circuits. Personal account: physics, sports, politics, and terrible puns.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
"Apparently that's a trigger for me" is a regularly part of my lexicon
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
401k distributions are already taxed as ordinary income so that part is moot
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Yeah I'm convinced the resolution is that the framing and intent of policy change its impact in important ways
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
You can't tell me what to do!

I think maybe it's that the framing is part of the consequence, like how it makes people feel is important
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Yup! Lots of low hanging fruit to fix before we get to any tough moral questions lll
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Yeah maybe I'm just overthinking people's understandable reactions to the idea of a childless tax penalty. It's really a political issue.

I do think people underestimate the cost. A CTC big enough to meaningfully change the calculus for most parents would be hundreds of billions a year.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
I agree! But a child tax credit or a childless tax surcharge are the same policy functionally not not morally, and it feels weird.

I did like the idea I saw to make all overtime paid. That would limit the career penalty of being a parent
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Like, if you subsidize something you effectively penalize not-that-thing and vice versa. And I think society needs kids, raising kids is so costly to the parents that many won't do it, so we need subsidies. But penalizing women for not having children is wrong! And I can't reconcile that.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Something I'm struggling with: "we should give money to parents to help offset the costs of raising children, which society needs" and "we should tax childless women more than mothers" are functionally the same policy, but the former sounds fine and the latter is abhorrent.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
But the D should get credit for keying on Goff's weaknesses in pre-snap adjustment and post-snap reads. He missed that TD badly, but he got incredibly lucky not to have 2 INTS (one was dropped, the other would have been a pick-6 but it was tipped at the line).
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Dont'a Hightower was a demigod that game, just had free reign to completely destroy everything the Rams were doing
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
King shit
razzball.bsky.social
Fan wearing a "Dump Here" jersey with 61 caught Cal's HR 🔥

Immediately changes into an identical 62 jersey
Described in skeet Described in skeet
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
I'm gonna guess Deputy Undersecretary of Agriculture?
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
FWIW I knew him in high school and his general approach to politics was pretty similar to how he's presenting now. It's not like I can vouch for him currently on every issue but I'm pretty sure he's not a secret conservative.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Berkeley Physics notching another W today (and their laureate is MUCH nicer than Stanford's)
rincewind.run
my favorite Cal vs Stanford dunk is Cal pointing out that the periodic table contains Berkelium and Californium but no Stanfordium

(also Seaborgium, which is named after a Cal Nobel prize winner and is an anagram of Go Bears)
Graphic with Berkelium and Californium but still no “Stanfurdium”
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Hey historians quick question, what usually happens when the populace of the capitol is suddenly impoverished by the regime?
fintwitter.bsky.social
US House Speaker Johnson: Some legal analysts don't believe in shutdown backpay.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
28.5% of people who have given me an oral exam have won a Nobel prize in physics, compared to about .00002% of the population. If you feel your work is undervalued, I encourage you to come ask me physics questions until I almost have a panic attack.

(Congrats John!)
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
Resting running from pogroms face over here
Reposted by Creature in the treELIne
opinionhaver.bsky.social
looking on stack overflow for ways to work around something that is actually rooted in fundamental limits of physics.
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
The flip side of this is also fun. "You don't need a custom transformer model running on a massive cluster, we worked out the solution to this in junior year stat mech. The equation takes up 512 bytes and can run on my laptop in milliseconds."
opinionhaver.bsky.social
It’s funny to do computer things without coming from a computer background because occasionally I’ll be like “hey has anyone ever noticed this weird issue?!” and be told “yes, there is a massive $10 billion industry devoted exclusively to trying to solve that problem”
Reposted by Creature in the treELIne
reverendmoose.bsky.social
The first rule of Cassandras Club is you tell everyone about Cassandras Club and they don't believe you.
chanda.blacksky.app
Weird thing where people say “no one could have predicted it” when really what they mean is their political commitments and orientation were such that they ignored everyone who was predicting it

Sorry but “no one could have“ and you having your head stuck up your ass are two different situations
elilevensonfalk.bsky.social
I don't know how I know this but the 60 minutes watch is ticking in 2/4 time and interpreting it as triplets is deranged