Loved how he called out how flawed Judge Mehta's decision was in the search case - the emergence of AI is not indicative of the search market's competitiveness!!

There exist bipartisan proposals in the United States that address self-preferencing, discrimination, and interoperability (AICOA, ACCESS, OAMA) on behalf of the American people. The energy behind this hearing could be better spent on improving these competition proposals and passing them stateside.

Members of Congress are doing the American people a disservice by conflating foreign competition laws with American censorship while simultaneously doing nothing to address competition concerns directly. Despite ample opportunity to protect American consumers, Congress targets EU law instead.

My brain is actively atrophying from the buzzwords with no evidentiary basis. To be clear: the DMA is about competition, not content. Solely for the sake of relevance, the DSA, not the DMA creates the system of trusted flaggers that they are concerned about.

The underwhelming Google search remedies decision makes me recall a post I wrote on what happens after remedies: publicknowledge.org/beyond-remed.... Mehta's decision is a reminder that courts are not regulators. If we want industry-wide change, we need sector-specific regulation.

Writer seems to throw away the source material (the book) and mentally replace it with the parody movie Young Frankenstein starring Gene Wilder.

Join Public Knowledge for our upcoming in-person event on this paper, "The Kids Aren’t Alright Online: Building a Safer, Better Internet,” featuring panel discussions on how policymakers can create a safer online ecosystem for children and teens. RSVP today!

www.eventbrite.com/e/the-kids-a...