Writing higher and higher order iterations of ‘you were wrong to reject my paper complaining about your rejection of my paper complaining about your rejection of my paper…’ until finally one gets published

Is the stress on “you,” as in, “hey, go easy on these rats, they’ve got no other options”?

Yeah I work on Philosophy of AI, the Philosophy of A(merican) I(ndigenous peoples)

Looks great!! Love to see more scholarship on the Fodorian question of ‘How many games in town are there?’!

The photo completely misrepresents what Gettier looked like, and so is misleading despite giving a justifiable impression that he is hot. But the way he actually looks is also hot.

Wow I’m cured!

I think sometimes people assume that what people are objecting to about high difficulty is that it's frustrating and so they get moralistic about keeping your cool or something... but I think often it's objectionable just because repetition can be boring

Personally, if they do well in the playoffs coinflip then I always knew they were the real deal. If they don't then I knew it was fake all along.

Sorry didn't mean to get political

They're not even beating their pythagorean record, what's the argument that they're just lucky?

Getting a PhD can be easy AND make you an expert, some subjects are easy to become experts in like temporal perception or epidemiology