Else Verwoerd
@elseverwoerd.bsky.social
PhD Education. 38 years of teaching. Academic teacher educator.
Namesearching & defending a falsely alleged Woody Allen against idiotic odds. Father of three. Reasonable to the reasonable.
It/Its😁
Namesearching & defending a falsely alleged Woody Allen against idiotic odds. Father of three. Reasonable to the reasonable.
It/Its😁
you are not dutch
December 19, 2025 at 2:46 PM
you are not dutch
Woody Allen does not mean much to me. I may have watched only 10% of his movies, and I don't declare myself a fan.
Facts however do mean much to me. As is truth. And justice based on them.
Old values, I admit. But still of some value today.
Facts however do mean much to me. As is truth. And justice based on them.
Old values, I admit. But still of some value today.
December 19, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Woody Allen does not mean much to me. I may have watched only 10% of his movies, and I don't declare myself a fan.
Facts however do mean much to me. As is truth. And justice based on them.
Old values, I admit. But still of some value today.
Facts however do mean much to me. As is truth. And justice based on them.
Old values, I admit. But still of some value today.
What a nice gesture! You faked my Twitter profile!
You try to deceive your BlueSky followers!
Now we all know what stuff you are made of! A willful deceiver!
As a rule, Woody Haters take to falsehoods and deceit. You appear to be no exception.
Thank you for this kind gesture.
You try to deceive your BlueSky followers!
Now we all know what stuff you are made of! A willful deceiver!
As a rule, Woody Haters take to falsehoods and deceit. You appear to be no exception.
Thank you for this kind gesture.
December 19, 2025 at 2:43 PM
What a nice gesture! You faked my Twitter profile!
You try to deceive your BlueSky followers!
Now we all know what stuff you are made of! A willful deceiver!
As a rule, Woody Haters take to falsehoods and deceit. You appear to be no exception.
Thank you for this kind gesture.
You try to deceive your BlueSky followers!
Now we all know what stuff you are made of! A willful deceiver!
As a rule, Woody Haters take to falsehoods and deceit. You appear to be no exception.
Thank you for this kind gesture.
I read the article. Boiling it down to what Allen actually said, it gives no reason to consider their contacts as a 'friendship'. It refers to events that he visited along with lots of other 'illustrious people', and to a few photos.
If you believe differently, show the facts that prove me wrong.
If you believe differently, show the facts that prove me wrong.
December 19, 2025 at 2:40 PM
I read the article. Boiling it down to what Allen actually said, it gives no reason to consider their contacts as a 'friendship'. It refers to events that he visited along with lots of other 'illustrious people', and to a few photos.
If you believe differently, show the facts that prove me wrong.
If you believe differently, show the facts that prove me wrong.
In your dreams, darling.
December 19, 2025 at 2:34 PM
In your dreams, darling.
So far, it has not been a rough day.
Would that be a rough day for you, if it would turn out to not be a rough day for me?
Would that be a rough day for you, if it would turn out to not be a rough day for me?
December 19, 2025 at 2:34 PM
So far, it has not been a rough day.
Would that be a rough day for you, if it would turn out to not be a rough day for me?
Would that be a rough day for you, if it would turn out to not be a rough day for me?
I don't think any of the hundreds of celebrities, politicians, artists, journalists went to Epstein's 'dinners' by accident.
Seems to me they went there because they were invited, were curious as to what event it would be, and whom they would meet there.
Do you have any facts refuting this view?
Seems to me they went there because they were invited, were curious as to what event it would be, and whom they would meet there.
Do you have any facts refuting this view?
December 19, 2025 at 2:34 PM
I don't think any of the hundreds of celebrities, politicians, artists, journalists went to Epstein's 'dinners' by accident.
Seems to me they went there because they were invited, were curious as to what event it would be, and whom they would meet there.
Do you have any facts refuting this view?
Seems to me they went there because they were invited, were curious as to what event it would be, and whom they would meet there.
Do you have any facts refuting this view?
You have ZERO serious, factual reasons to believe, or claim that these people were 'close personal friends'.
Yet you do.
I's say: work on your gullibility. As it is not a recommended personal trait.
Yet you do.
I's say: work on your gullibility. As it is not a recommended personal trait.
December 18, 2025 at 8:09 PM
You have ZERO serious, factual reasons to believe, or claim that these people were 'close personal friends'.
Yet you do.
I's say: work on your gullibility. As it is not a recommended personal trait.
Yet you do.
I's say: work on your gullibility. As it is not a recommended personal trait.
Sorry, they don't. For my sake, they might not exist, and you're sitting at home in your wheelchair all day long, typing away.
December 18, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Sorry, they don't. For my sake, they might not exist, and you're sitting at home in your wheelchair all day long, typing away.
Just like you, I have no factual information about the authenticity or factual background of this photo.
It is quite the Rorschach test, isn't it?
It is quite the Rorschach test, isn't it?
December 18, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Just like you, I have no factual information about the authenticity or factual background of this photo.
It is quite the Rorschach test, isn't it?
It is quite the Rorschach test, isn't it?
Do people who ask two relevant questions usually 'seem upset' to you?
Now that's upsetting.
Please consider answering the questions.
Now that's upsetting.
Please consider answering the questions.
December 18, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Do people who ask two relevant questions usually 'seem upset' to you?
Now that's upsetting.
Please consider answering the questions.
Now that's upsetting.
Please consider answering the questions.
They don't count.
Anyway, how are you today?
Anyway, how are you today?
December 18, 2025 at 8:01 PM
They don't count.
Anyway, how are you today?
Anyway, how are you today?
Why did you post this photo?
Do you believe his, ahem, 'underage wife' is anywhere in this photo?
Or do you just like to send random photos because you have nothing of relevance to offer?
Do you believe his, ahem, 'underage wife' is anywhere in this photo?
Or do you just like to send random photos because you have nothing of relevance to offer?
December 18, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Why did you post this photo?
Do you believe his, ahem, 'underage wife' is anywhere in this photo?
Or do you just like to send random photos because you have nothing of relevance to offer?
Do you believe his, ahem, 'underage wife' is anywhere in this photo?
Or do you just like to send random photos because you have nothing of relevance to offer?
Nope. Before I did, no one else asked you how you are doing today.
December 18, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Nope. Before I did, no one else asked you how you are doing today.
I don't care one dime how many 'followers' someone has.
If they present a clear, vicious falsehood, they should be accountable for that.
By the way, why are you *fantasizing* that people think 'pedo-rape is no big deal'?
Such fantasies are not healthy. Better take this up with your local shrink.
If they present a clear, vicious falsehood, they should be accountable for that.
By the way, why are you *fantasizing* that people think 'pedo-rape is no big deal'?
Such fantasies are not healthy. Better take this up with your local shrink.
December 18, 2025 at 7:57 PM
I don't care one dime how many 'followers' someone has.
If they present a clear, vicious falsehood, they should be accountable for that.
By the way, why are you *fantasizing* that people think 'pedo-rape is no big deal'?
Such fantasies are not healthy. Better take this up with your local shrink.
If they present a clear, vicious falsehood, they should be accountable for that.
By the way, why are you *fantasizing* that people think 'pedo-rape is no big deal'?
Such fantasies are not healthy. Better take this up with your local shrink.
Thank you for proving my point: that Woody 'abuse' allegers have nothing of substance to offer.
December 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Thank you for proving my point: that Woody 'abuse' allegers have nothing of substance to offer.
This is what Bechet Allen has said about that publication of her photo as a young girl, by people who like to *trick* their followers into the false belief that she is her own mother, Soon-Yi Previn.
December 18, 2025 at 7:47 PM
This is what Bechet Allen has said about that publication of her photo as a young girl, by people who like to *trick* their followers into the false belief that she is her own mother, Soon-Yi Previn.
Bechet Allen, a daughter of Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn, was adopted as a baby in 1999.
She's a grown adult today, and this is what she has to say about her parents/father.
She's a grown adult today, and this is what she has to say about her parents/father.
December 18, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Bechet Allen, a daughter of Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn, was adopted as a baby in 1999.
She's a grown adult today, and this is what she has to say about her parents/father.
She's a grown adult today, and this is what she has to say about her parents/father.
How are you doing today?
December 18, 2025 at 7:42 PM
How are you doing today?
Woody Allen never had an 'underage wife'.
Nor any other 'underage lover'.
So it seems that this concept of 'underage wives' come directly from *your* fantasy.
Maybe talk to your local shrink about this.
Nor any other 'underage lover'.
So it seems that this concept of 'underage wives' come directly from *your* fantasy.
Maybe talk to your local shrink about this.
December 18, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Woody Allen never had an 'underage wife'.
Nor any other 'underage lover'.
So it seems that this concept of 'underage wives' come directly from *your* fantasy.
Maybe talk to your local shrink about this.
Nor any other 'underage lover'.
So it seems that this concept of 'underage wives' come directly from *your* fantasy.
Maybe talk to your local shrink about this.
Does it bother you there's ZERO factual evidence for him having committed even a SINGLE pedophile act in 90 years' time?
As far as the FACTS go, Woody Allen has only dated adult and above-age women. That is *not* a pedophile.
He did not marry some 'daughter'.
The 'molestation' was 100% disproven.
As far as the FACTS go, Woody Allen has only dated adult and above-age women. That is *not* a pedophile.
He did not marry some 'daughter'.
The 'molestation' was 100% disproven.
December 18, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Does it bother you there's ZERO factual evidence for him having committed even a SINGLE pedophile act in 90 years' time?
As far as the FACTS go, Woody Allen has only dated adult and above-age women. That is *not* a pedophile.
He did not marry some 'daughter'.
The 'molestation' was 100% disproven.
As far as the FACTS go, Woody Allen has only dated adult and above-age women. That is *not* a pedophile.
He did not marry some 'daughter'.
The 'molestation' was 100% disproven.
Pablo Picasso, 1914. 'Bowl of fruit, bottle and violin'.
London, National Gallery.
London, National Gallery.
December 10, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Pablo Picasso, 1914. 'Bowl of fruit, bottle and violin'.
London, National Gallery.
London, National Gallery.
Hello Dr Torres, do you find it difficult to respond to the facts I presented?
December 7, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Hello Dr Torres, do you find it difficult to respond to the facts I presented?
Hello Dr Torres, do you find it difficult to respond to the facts I presented?
December 7, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Hello Dr Torres, do you find it difficult to respond to the facts I presented?
Isn't it a shame that Dylan did not speak the truth? I think it is.
December 4, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Isn't it a shame that Dylan did not speak the truth? I think it is.