Elyzium
@elyzium.bsky.social
We had multiple tire vendors, and it wasn't exactly good. Bridgestone was often a lot slower, made them look bad and the teams choosing them had no chance no matter how good their car was.
November 2, 2025 at 6:03 PM
We had multiple tire vendors, and it wasn't exactly good. Bridgestone was often a lot slower, made them look bad and the teams choosing them had no chance no matter how good their car was.
"If you give them arms we nuke"
"If you give them tanks we nuke"
"If you give them jets we nuke"
The best moment to arm Ukraine was yesterday. The second best is today.
Russia will never stop, they'll take Ukraine and attack the baltics next.
"If you give them tanks we nuke"
"If you give them jets we nuke"
The best moment to arm Ukraine was yesterday. The second best is today.
Russia will never stop, they'll take Ukraine and attack the baltics next.
July 8, 2025 at 3:29 PM
"If you give them arms we nuke"
"If you give them tanks we nuke"
"If you give them jets we nuke"
The best moment to arm Ukraine was yesterday. The second best is today.
Russia will never stop, they'll take Ukraine and attack the baltics next.
"If you give them tanks we nuke"
"If you give them jets we nuke"
The best moment to arm Ukraine was yesterday. The second best is today.
Russia will never stop, they'll take Ukraine and attack the baltics next.
We're in the post-truth era. Nothing that has ever been said matters anymore. No fact is undisputed.
You can simply state the opposite and thus a new truth has been born. Same reason why those fascist parties are rising so fast. They aren't bound by truth or facts, unlike everyone else.
You can simply state the opposite and thus a new truth has been born. Same reason why those fascist parties are rising so fast. They aren't bound by truth or facts, unlike everyone else.
April 16, 2025 at 3:56 PM
We're in the post-truth era. Nothing that has ever been said matters anymore. No fact is undisputed.
You can simply state the opposite and thus a new truth has been born. Same reason why those fascist parties are rising so fast. They aren't bound by truth or facts, unlike everyone else.
You can simply state the opposite and thus a new truth has been born. Same reason why those fascist parties are rising so fast. They aren't bound by truth or facts, unlike everyone else.
The market is equally confused as the rest of us of what the fuck they are doing.
April 9, 2025 at 6:52 PM
The market is equally confused as the rest of us of what the fuck they are doing.
So... that means we're clear on OPSEC?
April 3, 2025 at 1:45 PM
So... that means we're clear on OPSEC?
It is not a VAT. VAT is the same for everyone, no matter if you sell stuff domestic or it gets imported.
Tariffs are hurting US consumers and every foreign business that sold to them so far, and sends a clear signal: Do not engage in trade with the US, we'll fuck you over at any time.
Tariffs are hurting US consumers and every foreign business that sold to them so far, and sends a clear signal: Do not engage in trade with the US, we'll fuck you over at any time.
April 3, 2025 at 10:41 AM
It is not a VAT. VAT is the same for everyone, no matter if you sell stuff domestic or it gets imported.
Tariffs are hurting US consumers and every foreign business that sold to them so far, and sends a clear signal: Do not engage in trade with the US, we'll fuck you over at any time.
Tariffs are hurting US consumers and every foreign business that sold to them so far, and sends a clear signal: Do not engage in trade with the US, we'll fuck you over at any time.
You can use Signal without exposing your number. The fact that they aren't using a separate device is their own fuckup, and exactly why you shouldn't use Signal when threatened by state actors.
Still, Signal itself is NOT compromised. It is always active user action that creates those fuckups.
Still, Signal itself is NOT compromised. It is always active user action that creates those fuckups.
March 27, 2025 at 2:18 PM
You can use Signal without exposing your number. The fact that they aren't using a separate device is their own fuckup, and exactly why you shouldn't use Signal when threatened by state actors.
Still, Signal itself is NOT compromised. It is always active user action that creates those fuckups.
Still, Signal itself is NOT compromised. It is always active user action that creates those fuckups.
This is simply not true. There is no evidence of Signal being compromised.
What is known though, that there are certain flaws that can be used to trick unsuspecting (or stupid) users into leaking information.
Also, if your phone is compromised, Signal won't be able to help you.
What is known though, that there are certain flaws that can be used to trick unsuspecting (or stupid) users into leaking information.
Also, if your phone is compromised, Signal won't be able to help you.
March 27, 2025 at 11:39 AM
This is simply not true. There is no evidence of Signal being compromised.
What is known though, that there are certain flaws that can be used to trick unsuspecting (or stupid) users into leaking information.
Also, if your phone is compromised, Signal won't be able to help you.
What is known though, that there are certain flaws that can be used to trick unsuspecting (or stupid) users into leaking information.
Also, if your phone is compromised, Signal won't be able to help you.
It isn't, its a formal process. But they used the same argument in the past with all the boxes found in Trumps Golf resort )
March 25, 2025 at 3:37 PM
It isn't, its a formal process. But they used the same argument in the past with all the boxes found in Trumps Golf resort )
Most of them have always been rich, including Elon. The traps are there, but for the poor.
March 21, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Most of them have always been rich, including Elon. The traps are there, but for the poor.
They're meant to be put on Taiwanese beaches though? Not sure they get a friendly welcome.
March 13, 2025 at 8:31 AM
They're meant to be put on Taiwanese beaches though? Not sure they get a friendly welcome.
How would they be able to defend those from FoV drones? Looks like a very hard task to accomplish?
March 13, 2025 at 8:16 AM
How would they be able to defend those from FoV drones? Looks like a very hard task to accomplish?
They strive for simple solutions in a complex world. To free their own mind from complex questions and answers, they are eager to give up all the liberties that democracy has given them.
March 4, 2025 at 12:23 PM
They strive for simple solutions in a complex world. To free their own mind from complex questions and answers, they are eager to give up all the liberties that democracy has given them.
That is not the UI they're using, just "a" UI though.
February 23, 2025 at 8:57 PM
That is not the UI they're using, just "a" UI though.
That's the theory though. Maybe their UI just doesn't really show what the TX is about anyways, and they blindly signed it thinking it was a regular TX?
February 23, 2025 at 2:52 PM
That's the theory though. Maybe their UI just doesn't really show what the TX is about anyways, and they blindly signed it thinking it was a regular TX?
They signed a transaction they shouldn't have.
February 23, 2025 at 12:01 PM
They signed a transaction they shouldn't have.
This is an absolutely insane situation to be honest, and shows that crypto is a heavily concentrated playground for very very rich people and actors. Far gone are the dreams of financial independency, crypto has become the very nightmare it tried to combat with BTC over 15 years ago.
February 23, 2025 at 9:03 AM
This is an absolutely insane situation to be honest, and shows that crypto is a heavily concentrated playground for very very rich people and actors. Far gone are the dreams of financial independency, crypto has become the very nightmare it tried to combat with BTC over 15 years ago.
There are two scenarios: A) they aren't solvent, and we'll shortly find out or B) they actually do have all the funds for user deposits.. don't you ask yourself whether this is a good thing if one company holds 0.05% of one of the top cryptocurrencies and still functions after loosing it?
February 23, 2025 at 9:03 AM
There are two scenarios: A) they aren't solvent, and we'll shortly find out or B) they actually do have all the funds for user deposits.. don't you ask yourself whether this is a good thing if one company holds 0.05% of one of the top cryptocurrencies and still functions after loosing it?
You can easily check this. It is true, holding elections at wartime is unconstitutional in Ukraine.
It also wouldn't make a lot of sense, given the amount of displaces people that would be unable to vote.
It also wouldn't make a lot of sense, given the amount of displaces people that would be unable to vote.
February 19, 2025 at 9:07 PM
You can easily check this. It is true, holding elections at wartime is unconstitutional in Ukraine.
It also wouldn't make a lot of sense, given the amount of displaces people that would be unable to vote.
It also wouldn't make a lot of sense, given the amount of displaces people that would be unable to vote.
I usually mix the liquid anitbiotics into a portion of churros / liquidnack. Works perfectly and my cat gobbles it up.
I do the same with tablets that can be pulverized 🤣
I do the same with tablets that can be pulverized 🤣
January 19, 2025 at 9:10 AM
I usually mix the liquid anitbiotics into a portion of churros / liquidnack. Works perfectly and my cat gobbles it up.
I do the same with tablets that can be pulverized 🤣
I do the same with tablets that can be pulverized 🤣
Wären Sie grundsätzlich nicht verpflichtet die Nutzer zu informieren, wenn diese EU Bürger sind (GDPR kennt ja diesbezüglich keine Grenzen?) resp. EU Bürger die Services nutzen können?
December 17, 2024 at 8:11 PM
Wären Sie grundsätzlich nicht verpflichtet die Nutzer zu informieren, wenn diese EU Bürger sind (GDPR kennt ja diesbezüglich keine Grenzen?) resp. EU Bürger die Services nutzen können?
They literally signed a treaty to prevent future aggression, giving up their nuclear arsenal.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapes...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapes...
Budapest Memorandum - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
December 13, 2024 at 10:28 PM
They literally signed a treaty to prevent future aggression, giving up their nuclear arsenal.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapes...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapes...
And in the end, they bump into each other. This probably isn't the moment where VER got his tyre sliced, but might be the moment where NOR lost control so they touched again slightly later.
I guess 99/100 times nothing happens in those instances, just a bit of wheel bangin. But yeah, that was 1/100
I guess 99/100 times nothing happens in those instances, just a bit of wheel bangin. But yeah, that was 1/100
July 1, 2024 at 3:46 PM
And in the end, they bump into each other. This probably isn't the moment where VER got his tyre sliced, but might be the moment where NOR lost control so they touched again slightly later.
I guess 99/100 times nothing happens in those instances, just a bit of wheel bangin. But yeah, that was 1/100
I guess 99/100 times nothing happens in those instances, just a bit of wheel bangin. But yeah, that was 1/100
Splitseconds later (you can see its only 50 meter from the brake markers), the situation has changed:
- VER noticed that NOR is coming down quite fast on the outside
- He turns ever so slightly left to deny him the space on the outside of the turn.
- VER noticed that NOR is coming down quite fast on the outside
- He turns ever so slightly left to deny him the space on the outside of the turn.
July 1, 2024 at 3:43 PM
Splitseconds later (you can see its only 50 meter from the brake markers), the situation has changed:
- VER noticed that NOR is coming down quite fast on the outside
- He turns ever so slightly left to deny him the space on the outside of the turn.
- VER noticed that NOR is coming down quite fast on the outside
- He turns ever so slightly left to deny him the space on the outside of the turn.