https://www.emiliozaratiegui.com
emiliozaratiegui.github.io/Personal-Web...
📈📉 You can also see the rest of my research agenda at
www.emiliozaratiegui.com/home
emiliozaratiegui.github.io/Personal-Web...
📈📉 You can also see the rest of my research agenda at
www.emiliozaratiegui.com/home
Trade-off is relevant -> Adding investment and misallocation turns tax (dashed black) into subsidy (solid blue)
Result driven mostly by effects on productivity
Trade-off is relevant -> Adding investment and misallocation turns tax (dashed black) into subsidy (solid blue)
Result driven mostly by effects on productivity
Using firm-level balance sheet data, estimate misallocation (dispersion in marginal returns to capital)
Use as input to obtain elasticity of TFP with respect to investment
Using firm-level balance sheet data, estimate misallocation (dispersion in marginal returns to capital)
Use as input to obtain elasticity of TFP with respect to investment
Key object: Productivity losses from capital controls
I obtain a closed form expression that depends on cross-sectional misallocation across firms
How can this be measured?
Key object: Productivity losses from capital controls
I obtain a closed form expression that depends on cross-sectional misallocation across firms
How can this be measured?
Capital controls prevent and mitigate crises but affect productivity
Is this quantitatively relevant?
Capital controls prevent and mitigate crises but affect productivity
Is this quantitatively relevant?
As benchmark, first allow policymaker to control allocation of credit between consumption and investment.
Capital control on borrowing and investment subsidy ➡️ No trade-off
As benchmark, first allow policymaker to control allocation of credit between consumption and investment.
Capital control on borrowing and investment subsidy ➡️ No trade-off
Capital controls can reduce foreign borrowing ➡️ Prevents and mitigates crises
This is the standard motivation in the literature and underpins the IMF view
Capital controls can reduce foreign borrowing ➡️ Prevents and mitigates crises
This is the standard motivation in the literature and underpins the IMF view
1) Financial crises: Households (HH) face a borrowing constraint that depends on income ➡️ when it binds, reduced borrowing reduces income leading to vicious cycle
2) Misallocation: Firms differ in their ability to access capital ➡️ reduced productivity
1) Financial crises: Households (HH) face a borrowing constraint that depends on income ➡️ when it binds, reduced borrowing reduces income leading to vicious cycle
2) Misallocation: Firms differ in their ability to access capital ➡️ reduced productivity
Capital controls have become a key policy tool and are now part of the IMF toolkit
Traditional view: Capital controls can contribute to financial stability
Overlooked: Effects on productivity through misallocation that have been empirically documented
Capital controls have become a key policy tool and are now part of the IMF toolkit
Traditional view: Capital controls can contribute to financial stability
Overlooked: Effects on productivity through misallocation that have been empirically documented