Emissary of the Deep State
banner
emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social
Emissary of the Deep State
@emissaryofthedeep.bsky.social
NSFW takes and opinions in most cases

Esmi Priscos
One of thise shadowy global bankers
This is my outlet.

https://emissaryofthedeepstate.substack.com
#ThankYouJoeBiden 💙

Not a profile for the weak of heart as it mocks the bloodsport that is politics
Considering the loose definition of unemployment….not great
November 8, 2025 at 5:09 PM
The Progressive banners are rising
November 6, 2025 at 3:03 AM
So hell talk about it once and then trust me”deregulation” to do the rest. Got it
November 6, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Eh I give up.

best of luck with it then. Keep on trying to work within the existing framework.
March 9, 2025 at 6:17 PM
The whole point is that if we get rid of section 230 i can sue the energy company for CO?
March 9, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Now section 230 covers the energy sector. Wonderful.
March 9, 2025 at 5:57 PM
I mean was prison until death with no possibility of parole not bad enough in that case?
March 9, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Yep, thats about right.

“But he doesnt mean that” i hear the RWs chanting in unison as the look into chicken farming
March 9, 2025 at 5:42 PM
This is correct, i should have said FD and not ET, all apologies
March 9, 2025 at 5:39 PM
If that was your takeaway, were done here
March 9, 2025 at 5:36 PM
And in that regard I disagree with you. Did you read the article this is all in response to?
March 9, 2025 at 5:33 PM
You have completed missed the point.

When you speak with someone IRL and you ask where they got some flagrantly wrong info. Where do they say they heard it?

Do they often quote the specific poster or the platform?

That wasnt an issue weve had with libraries
March 9, 2025 at 5:06 PM
The point I was making is the library is creating a new book by smashing together contents of others. Like a newsfeed
March 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM
The ability to audit the actual prop code and processes in tandem with a random sample of feeds and say “this is messed up” or “its ok”
March 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Good questions and i definitely have some ideas. May be better for a blog than short form.

But Im not saying it would be perfect, but I think it starts with the creation of a department that does before and after oversight on social media and entertainment algos. I think someome needs
March 9, 2025 at 5:01 PM
In my analogy they would be an author if they removed the covers and glued books together.
March 9, 2025 at 4:52 PM
People dont fall into disinfo because they watch one guy, no matter how crazy. They fall to it because a feed picks up that they are susceptible to it and floods them with one sided stuff until they think thats reality.
March 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Thats the archaic thinking these things hide behind.

I can craft an entire narrative using 3rd party content without actually editing a word.

The total here is greater than the sum of its parts.
March 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM
A man can dream lol
March 9, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Oh god i know who your talking about but im blanking on the name too!
March 9, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Sure.

Lets call it a process that curates information for viewership based on the individual as opposed to a broad audience.
March 9, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Because we get back to the fear of a dominant point of view influencing election outcomes, which is the same reasoning underpinning its original enaction
March 9, 2025 at 4:29 PM