Dr Emu, Graham Pringle, PhD
@emugraham.substack.com
Teens need Empowered, Motivated, and Understanding adults - EMU’s!
Research on complex trauma made humane and accessible for caring adults
Yuggera country, Australia
https://emugraham.substack.com/p/the-emu-files?r=61vd6l
https://linktr.ee/DrEmu
Research on complex trauma made humane and accessible for caring adults
Yuggera country, Australia
https://emugraham.substack.com/p/the-emu-files?r=61vd6l
https://linktr.ee/DrEmu
At last census, just under 40%. Christians just over. Next year Christians will probably be fewer than we with no gods
In the USA believers are over 60%
In the USA believers are over 60%
December 21, 2025 at 9:17 AM
At last census, just under 40%. Christians just over. Next year Christians will probably be fewer than we with no gods
In the USA believers are over 60%
In the USA believers are over 60%
Congratulations! An important milestone and darned hard work
December 21, 2025 at 8:55 AM
Congratulations! An important milestone and darned hard work
Reposted by Dr Emu, Graham Pringle, PhD
“No federal or state law enforcement agency has provided any evidence to the public that the alleged gunmen were motivated by pro-Palestinian beliefs.”
But their actions will be used to criminalise opposition to genocide anyway #auspol
But their actions will be used to criminalise opposition to genocide anyway #auspol
December 21, 2025 at 7:01 AM
“No federal or state law enforcement agency has provided any evidence to the public that the alleged gunmen were motivated by pro-Palestinian beliefs.”
But their actions will be used to criminalise opposition to genocide anyway #auspol
But their actions will be used to criminalise opposition to genocide anyway #auspol
40% of the pop are Christian and same number know that gods don't exist
He might try some balancing of his responsibilities
He might try some balancing of his responsibilities
December 21, 2025 at 8:54 AM
40% of the pop are Christian and same number know that gods don't exist
He might try some balancing of his responsibilities
He might try some balancing of his responsibilities
Did Walz use the other parts of DARVO other than Victim?
I didn't hear that
Christo-Nat's use it differently
As abuse and mocking. In their world, people who don't take personal responsibility are weak, lost, godless, whingers, etc
This was contempt
I explain at p.5 doi.org/10.1007/s423...
I didn't hear that
Christo-Nat's use it differently
As abuse and mocking. In their world, people who don't take personal responsibility are weak, lost, godless, whingers, etc
This was contempt
I explain at p.5 doi.org/10.1007/s423...
A tale of two systems; How beliefs lead to harmful outdoor practice - Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education
In the experiential outdoor sector, differing beliefs about complex trauma and causes of harm can result in markedly different approaches to outdoor leadership practices. This paper examines the confl...
doi.org
December 21, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Did Walz use the other parts of DARVO other than Victim?
I didn't hear that
Christo-Nat's use it differently
As abuse and mocking. In their world, people who don't take personal responsibility are weak, lost, godless, whingers, etc
This was contempt
I explain at p.5 doi.org/10.1007/s423...
I didn't hear that
Christo-Nat's use it differently
As abuse and mocking. In their world, people who don't take personal responsibility are weak, lost, godless, whingers, etc
This was contempt
I explain at p.5 doi.org/10.1007/s423...
Five! From a bolt action. How many times did the arsehole shoot at Ahmed I wonder?
Was Ahmed distracting the shooter from aiming at others, as well as tackling the elder one?
Drawing fire is absolutely heroic and more than one casualty did so it seems
Was Ahmed distracting the shooter from aiming at others, as well as tackling the elder one?
Drawing fire is absolutely heroic and more than one casualty did so it seems
December 21, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Five! From a bolt action. How many times did the arsehole shoot at Ahmed I wonder?
Was Ahmed distracting the shooter from aiming at others, as well as tackling the elder one?
Drawing fire is absolutely heroic and more than one casualty did so it seems
Was Ahmed distracting the shooter from aiming at others, as well as tackling the elder one?
Drawing fire is absolutely heroic and more than one casualty did so it seems
Hundreds of previous examples support this prediction
Just look to the USA for how this will go down
Ban hate, not dissent
The words on the signs carried are more important than the number of people carrying signs
Just look to the USA for how this will go down
Ban hate, not dissent
The words on the signs carried are more important than the number of people carrying signs
December 21, 2025 at 12:04 AM
Hundreds of previous examples support this prediction
Just look to the USA for how this will go down
Ban hate, not dissent
The words on the signs carried are more important than the number of people carrying signs
Just look to the USA for how this will go down
Ban hate, not dissent
The words on the signs carried are more important than the number of people carrying signs
The easiest mechanism might just be for the USA to join almost all UN nations by ratifying all human rights conventions, and then requiring that minimum standard internally
December 20, 2025 at 11:56 PM
The easiest mechanism might just be for the USA to join almost all UN nations by ratifying all human rights conventions, and then requiring that minimum standard internally
So many things to be done in the post Trump Renaissance
'Never again' might be the guide, and also 'dignity for all'
'Never again' might be the guide, and also 'dignity for all'
December 20, 2025 at 11:54 PM
So many things to be done in the post Trump Renaissance
'Never again' might be the guide, and also 'dignity for all'
'Never again' might be the guide, and also 'dignity for all'
Hate speech is not free speech. The very point of hate is to subjugate
Legislate, and fine her into oblivion
Legislate, and fine her into oblivion
December 20, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Hate speech is not free speech. The very point of hate is to subjugate
Legislate, and fine her into oblivion
Legislate, and fine her into oblivion
Re P2025 pic; why would we want politically accountable decision makers?
Don't we want to best, the most meritorious and NOT the political favourites to make public health decisions?
That seems weird, but I am not a US citizen. Must be different there?
Don't we want to best, the most meritorious and NOT the political favourites to make public health decisions?
That seems weird, but I am not a US citizen. Must be different there?
December 20, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Re P2025 pic; why would we want politically accountable decision makers?
Don't we want to best, the most meritorious and NOT the political favourites to make public health decisions?
That seems weird, but I am not a US citizen. Must be different there?
Don't we want to best, the most meritorious and NOT the political favourites to make public health decisions?
That seems weird, but I am not a US citizen. Must be different there?
Reposted by Dr Emu, Graham Pringle, PhD
“Trump, by contrast, is rechristening things for himself and then pretending it’s an honor rather than an ego trip. He asks not what he can do for his country, but what his country can name for him."
December 20, 2025 at 7:41 PM
“Trump, by contrast, is rechristening things for himself and then pretending it’s an honor rather than an ego trip. He asks not what he can do for his country, but what his country can name for him."
"Past is prologue"
Very good!
Very good!
December 20, 2025 at 10:36 PM
"Past is prologue"
Very good!
Very good!
Sorry, I am not familiar with the analogy. Fruit from trees fertilised by effluent are not poisoned are they? Bruce may know
We disagree on AI being monolithic. It is many things. Monoliths are single things
Prohibition did not work on pinball machines, alch nor now drugs. Other policies do work
We disagree on AI being monolithic. It is many things. Monoliths are single things
Prohibition did not work on pinball machines, alch nor now drugs. Other policies do work
December 20, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Sorry, I am not familiar with the analogy. Fruit from trees fertilised by effluent are not poisoned are they? Bruce may know
We disagree on AI being monolithic. It is many things. Monoliths are single things
Prohibition did not work on pinball machines, alch nor now drugs. Other policies do work
We disagree on AI being monolithic. It is many things. Monoliths are single things
Prohibition did not work on pinball machines, alch nor now drugs. Other policies do work
Yet here you are in the interweb
December 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Yet here you are in the interweb
I research healing of child abuse and use AI for editing
Bruce writes about agriculture and horticulture
AI use is not monolithic
The www we use to post here has distributed CSAM since inception
CSAM permitting algorithms must be punished, but Epstein's friends...
Bruce writes about agriculture and horticulture
AI use is not monolithic
The www we use to post here has distributed CSAM since inception
CSAM permitting algorithms must be punished, but Epstein's friends...
December 20, 2025 at 10:12 PM
I research healing of child abuse and use AI for editing
Bruce writes about agriculture and horticulture
AI use is not monolithic
The www we use to post here has distributed CSAM since inception
CSAM permitting algorithms must be punished, but Epstein's friends...
Bruce writes about agriculture and horticulture
AI use is not monolithic
The www we use to post here has distributed CSAM since inception
CSAM permitting algorithms must be punished, but Epstein's friends...
You know, none of that changes
I don't recommend AI giving an opinion, just grammer, syntax, punctuation, restructuring a paragraph perhaps, if I am really struggling
AI cannot think critically at the ontological or epistemological level, or radically. It just applies rules to writing
I don't recommend AI giving an opinion, just grammer, syntax, punctuation, restructuring a paragraph perhaps, if I am really struggling
AI cannot think critically at the ontological or epistemological level, or radically. It just applies rules to writing
December 20, 2025 at 9:50 PM
You know, none of that changes
I don't recommend AI giving an opinion, just grammer, syntax, punctuation, restructuring a paragraph perhaps, if I am really struggling
AI cannot think critically at the ontological or epistemological level, or radically. It just applies rules to writing
I don't recommend AI giving an opinion, just grammer, syntax, punctuation, restructuring a paragraph perhaps, if I am really struggling
AI cannot think critically at the ontological or epistemological level, or radically. It just applies rules to writing
When bored, I have asked AI to revise and write in the style of Jar Jar Binks. Hilarious
December 20, 2025 at 9:45 PM
When bored, I have asked AI to revise and write in the style of Jar Jar Binks. Hilarious
Of course. None of that changes
I feed the AI a style guide I wrote so it edits to my preferences
For me, AI is just a modern thesaurus, playing with Grammer.
Never let AI create new text! Not only unethical, it is really bad at original writing, and cannot do critical analyses
I feed the AI a style guide I wrote so it edits to my preferences
For me, AI is just a modern thesaurus, playing with Grammer.
Never let AI create new text! Not only unethical, it is really bad at original writing, and cannot do critical analyses
December 20, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Of course. None of that changes
I feed the AI a style guide I wrote so it edits to my preferences
For me, AI is just a modern thesaurus, playing with Grammer.
Never let AI create new text! Not only unethical, it is really bad at original writing, and cannot do critical analyses
I feed the AI a style guide I wrote so it edits to my preferences
For me, AI is just a modern thesaurus, playing with Grammer.
Never let AI create new text! Not only unethical, it is really bad at original writing, and cannot do critical analyses
I've told quite a few students that their writing reads like AI, and list the reasons. Their next are often better
But the good thing is English as second language students now write with almost perfect Grammer. I used to feed their work into AI to work out what they meant!
It is a balance
But the good thing is English as second language students now write with almost perfect Grammer. I used to feed their work into AI to work out what they meant!
It is a balance
December 20, 2025 at 12:22 PM
I've told quite a few students that their writing reads like AI, and list the reasons. Their next are often better
But the good thing is English as second language students now write with almost perfect Grammer. I used to feed their work into AI to work out what they meant!
It is a balance
But the good thing is English as second language students now write with almost perfect Grammer. I used to feed their work into AI to work out what they meant!
It is a balance
I use AI too, as a kind of supervisor, after I've written everything. It suggests more concise sentences etc, but I only accept some. Otherwise it alters my style and the text loses it's originality
December 20, 2025 at 12:18 PM
I use AI too, as a kind of supervisor, after I've written everything. It suggests more concise sentences etc, but I only accept some. Otherwise it alters my style and the text loses it's originality
I failed a student for Assessment 1, pointing to sloppy AI-like writing and fake citations
Assessment 2 was of such a high standard I thought they had cheated again, but no. They had learned, were scared of failing, and their final score was a low credit
Holding authors to account should work
Assessment 2 was of such a high standard I thought they had cheated again, but no. They had learned, were scared of failing, and their final score was a low credit
Holding authors to account should work
December 20, 2025 at 11:05 AM
I failed a student for Assessment 1, pointing to sloppy AI-like writing and fake citations
Assessment 2 was of such a high standard I thought they had cheated again, but no. They had learned, were scared of failing, and their final score was a low credit
Holding authors to account should work
Assessment 2 was of such a high standard I thought they had cheated again, but no. They had learned, were scared of failing, and their final score was a low credit
Holding authors to account should work