@enggeek.bsky.social
But you soon won't. Neither military bases - in any European country - nor allies.
For a felon who prioritises his grandeur, power, and legacy; he weakens the west and will bankrupt America.
What's the point of Greenland when you're locked out of world trade?
For a felon who prioritises his grandeur, power, and legacy; he weakens the west and will bankrupt America.
What's the point of Greenland when you're locked out of world trade?
January 18, 2026 at 4:16 AM
But you soon won't. Neither military bases - in any European country - nor allies.
For a felon who prioritises his grandeur, power, and legacy; he weakens the west and will bankrupt America.
What's the point of Greenland when you're locked out of world trade?
For a felon who prioritises his grandeur, power, and legacy; he weakens the west and will bankrupt America.
What's the point of Greenland when you're locked out of world trade?
💯.
Also, the very idea of MAGA implies these "patriots" don't like their country.
Also, the very idea of MAGA implies these "patriots" don't like their country.
January 14, 2026 at 6:55 AM
💯.
Also, the very idea of MAGA implies these "patriots" don't like their country.
Also, the very idea of MAGA implies these "patriots" don't like their country.
Isn't it against the law to enter or break private property without a Judicial Warrant? Oh that's right... it is.
So anything these fuckheads find in such an arrest means the case falls flat under fruit of the poisonous tree.
Not law enforcement
So anything these fuckheads find in such an arrest means the case falls flat under fruit of the poisonous tree.
Not law enforcement
January 14, 2026 at 5:09 AM
Isn't it against the law to enter or break private property without a Judicial Warrant? Oh that's right... it is.
So anything these fuckheads find in such an arrest means the case falls flat under fruit of the poisonous tree.
Not law enforcement
So anything these fuckheads find in such an arrest means the case falls flat under fruit of the poisonous tree.
Not law enforcement
Absofuckinglutely
Reneging on the order of priority for corporations affected in Venezuela opens a massive can of worms exposing US credit to far higher risks than implied by the credit rating.
Reneging on the order of priority for corporations affected in Venezuela opens a massive can of worms exposing US credit to far higher risks than implied by the credit rating.
January 12, 2026 at 5:45 AM
Absofuckinglutely
Reneging on the order of priority for corporations affected in Venezuela opens a massive can of worms exposing US credit to far higher risks than implied by the credit rating.
Reneging on the order of priority for corporations affected in Venezuela opens a massive can of worms exposing US credit to far higher risks than implied by the credit rating.
As this is all the administration seems to understand, same logic- this is the way the rest of the world controls your dumb shit...
January 7, 2026 at 11:25 PM
As this is all the administration seems to understand, same logic- this is the way the rest of the world controls your dumb shit...
No fuck head, Chavez had a VP- Maduro.
Maduro was the president for the remainder of Chavez' term and then an election was held.
My statement earlier was a hypothetical, nothing more. It puts aside all your dumb arse arguments about breaking the law being cool if it's for a good purpose.
Maduro was the president for the remainder of Chavez' term and then an election was held.
My statement earlier was a hypothetical, nothing more. It puts aside all your dumb arse arguments about breaking the law being cool if it's for a good purpose.
January 6, 2026 at 11:16 AM
No fuck head, Chavez had a VP- Maduro.
Maduro was the president for the remainder of Chavez' term and then an election was held.
My statement earlier was a hypothetical, nothing more. It puts aside all your dumb arse arguments about breaking the law being cool if it's for a good purpose.
Maduro was the president for the remainder of Chavez' term and then an election was held.
My statement earlier was a hypothetical, nothing more. It puts aside all your dumb arse arguments about breaking the law being cool if it's for a good purpose.
Get a clue. The US is a member of the UN charter ( which is a binding treaty) also of the OAS, the Inter American Charter and the Vienna convention - all of which prohibit the abduction.
These represent all your long held treaties and your administration has broken all of them.
These represent all your long held treaties and your administration has broken all of them.
January 6, 2026 at 11:13 AM
Get a clue. The US is a member of the UN charter ( which is a binding treaty) also of the OAS, the Inter American Charter and the Vienna convention - all of which prohibit the abduction.
These represent all your long held treaties and your administration has broken all of them.
These represent all your long held treaties and your administration has broken all of them.
Let's pretend that every claim the right has made is non-political and on the money. Cool.
Maduro is a bad mofo. Who is legally recognised (by 115 votes at the UN) as the rightful leader.
The removal is illegal. By fruit of the poisonous tree it won't hold up in your court. What a fail
Maduro is a bad mofo. Who is legally recognised (by 115 votes at the UN) as the rightful leader.
The removal is illegal. By fruit of the poisonous tree it won't hold up in your court. What a fail
January 6, 2026 at 10:07 AM
Let's pretend that every claim the right has made is non-political and on the money. Cool.
Maduro is a bad mofo. Who is legally recognised (by 115 votes at the UN) as the rightful leader.
The removal is illegal. By fruit of the poisonous tree it won't hold up in your court. What a fail
Maduro is a bad mofo. Who is legally recognised (by 115 votes at the UN) as the rightful leader.
The removal is illegal. By fruit of the poisonous tree it won't hold up in your court. What a fail
The UN was investigating the election- at this time there's no conclusion to that so by international law, abduction is illegal. Sorry.
No other countries have claimed he's a narco trafficker, just the guy breaking international law.
No other countries have claimed he's a narco trafficker, just the guy breaking international law.
January 6, 2026 at 10:00 AM
The UN was investigating the election- at this time there's no conclusion to that so by international law, abduction is illegal. Sorry.
No other countries have claimed he's a narco trafficker, just the guy breaking international law.
No other countries have claimed he's a narco trafficker, just the guy breaking international law.
Fuck let's keep going.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence on a population to coerce a desired political outcome.
By definition, Trump's actions- bombing Venezuelan fishermen, or sending the military into blue states or threatening death sentences for dems- makes him a terrorist.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence on a population to coerce a desired political outcome.
By definition, Trump's actions- bombing Venezuelan fishermen, or sending the military into blue states or threatening death sentences for dems- makes him a terrorist.
January 6, 2026 at 9:55 AM
Fuck let's keep going.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence on a population to coerce a desired political outcome.
By definition, Trump's actions- bombing Venezuelan fishermen, or sending the military into blue states or threatening death sentences for dems- makes him a terrorist.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence on a population to coerce a desired political outcome.
By definition, Trump's actions- bombing Venezuelan fishermen, or sending the military into blue states or threatening death sentences for dems- makes him a terrorist.
is that coz you're a dumb cunt?
January 6, 2026 at 7:56 AM
is that coz you're a dumb cunt?
Also, shit doesn't get enforced mostly through the US using its veto power. Doesn't mean it's not the law. Also, the support and trade the US enjoys from the international community is derived from championing the law. Enjoy your ostracism without the law
January 6, 2026 at 7:46 AM
Also, shit doesn't get enforced mostly through the US using its veto power. Doesn't mean it's not the law. Also, the support and trade the US enjoys from the international community is derived from championing the law. Enjoy your ostracism without the law
Slow clap.
Countries in the UN vote for who gets in (they elect who gets in).
The representatives of each member country are chosen by the elected leaders of the member countries.
So... kinda elected
Countries in the UN vote for who gets in (they elect who gets in).
The representatives of each member country are chosen by the elected leaders of the member countries.
So... kinda elected
January 6, 2026 at 7:42 AM
Slow clap.
Countries in the UN vote for who gets in (they elect who gets in).
The representatives of each member country are chosen by the elected leaders of the member countries.
So... kinda elected
Countries in the UN vote for who gets in (they elect who gets in).
The representatives of each member country are chosen by the elected leaders of the member countries.
So... kinda elected
Fuck off, every member is elected. Every member state signed on to the UN and agreed to be bound by its terms. That included the US when they signed.
Also no one elected the US to be the world police.
Also no one elected the US to be the world police.
January 6, 2026 at 7:08 AM
Fuck off, every member is elected. Every member state signed on to the UN and agreed to be bound by its terms. That included the US when they signed.
Also no one elected the US to be the world police.
Also no one elected the US to be the world police.
What a load of drivel.
Your contention is that because Maduro was, in your opinion, odious, incompetent, and (anecdotally) unelected -his removal is justified.
Trump is odious and incompetent with anecdotal evidence the election was irregular so it'd be fine for anyone to kidnap him?
Your contention is that because Maduro was, in your opinion, odious, incompetent, and (anecdotally) unelected -his removal is justified.
Trump is odious and incompetent with anecdotal evidence the election was irregular so it'd be fine for anyone to kidnap him?
January 6, 2026 at 7:04 AM
What a load of drivel.
Your contention is that because Maduro was, in your opinion, odious, incompetent, and (anecdotally) unelected -his removal is justified.
Trump is odious and incompetent with anecdotal evidence the election was irregular so it'd be fine for anyone to kidnap him?
Your contention is that because Maduro was, in your opinion, odious, incompetent, and (anecdotally) unelected -his removal is justified.
Trump is odious and incompetent with anecdotal evidence the election was irregular so it'd be fine for anyone to kidnap him?
another charming distraction from all the young girls raped on Epstein island
December 27, 2025 at 9:16 AM
another charming distraction from all the young girls raped on Epstein island
It's still not a black market- just means they're not selling it on the US market
e.g. Germany and India were still buying Russian crude during Ukrainian - not a black market.
e.g. Germany and India were still buying Russian crude during Ukrainian - not a black market.
December 18, 2025 at 9:47 PM
It's still not a black market- just means they're not selling it on the US market
e.g. Germany and India were still buying Russian crude during Ukrainian - not a black market.
e.g. Germany and India were still buying Russian crude during Ukrainian - not a black market.
Shit reporting really. Venezuela owns their oil so selling it isn't a black market. Blockading Venezuela is against international law.
Killing Venezuelan fisherman is murder or the very least a war crime.
From a US perspective, without congressional approval - all high crimes.
Killing Venezuelan fisherman is murder or the very least a war crime.
From a US perspective, without congressional approval - all high crimes.
December 18, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Shit reporting really. Venezuela owns their oil so selling it isn't a black market. Blockading Venezuela is against international law.
Killing Venezuelan fisherman is murder or the very least a war crime.
From a US perspective, without congressional approval - all high crimes.
Killing Venezuelan fisherman is murder or the very least a war crime.
From a US perspective, without congressional approval - all high crimes.
The guys in QLD that killed cops a few years ago were known to police and were Sov cits. The guys in Bondi were flagged on a watch list.
The existing laws exclude them from gun ownership and it's exceedingly easy to flag and send police to remove the firearm.
The existing laws exclude them from gun ownership and it's exceedingly easy to flag and send police to remove the firearm.
December 18, 2025 at 11:46 AM
The guys in QLD that killed cops a few years ago were known to police and were Sov cits. The guys in Bondi were flagged on a watch list.
The existing laws exclude them from gun ownership and it's exceedingly easy to flag and send police to remove the firearm.
The existing laws exclude them from gun ownership and it's exceedingly easy to flag and send police to remove the firearm.
Most of your points aren't unreasonable, I disagree with a few and I'm sure there's a middle ground.
Your last point isn't though. Take something like Sovereign Citizens- 25k in Australia. Isis 250. Not a lot of people reaching flagged IPs.
Your last point isn't though. Take something like Sovereign Citizens- 25k in Australia. Isis 250. Not a lot of people reaching flagged IPs.
December 18, 2025 at 11:43 AM
Most of your points aren't unreasonable, I disagree with a few and I'm sure there's a middle ground.
Your last point isn't though. Take something like Sovereign Citizens- 25k in Australia. Isis 250. Not a lot of people reaching flagged IPs.
Your last point isn't though. Take something like Sovereign Citizens- 25k in Australia. Isis 250. Not a lot of people reaching flagged IPs.
For sure, and always will be threats. My concern is if a legal (traceable) route isn't available the less convenient illegal and untraceable route still exists.
We have metadata laws for a reason so tools are available. Not perfect but nothing is.
We have metadata laws for a reason so tools are available. Not perfect but nothing is.
December 18, 2025 at 11:02 AM
For sure, and always will be threats. My concern is if a legal (traceable) route isn't available the less convenient illegal and untraceable route still exists.
We have metadata laws for a reason so tools are available. Not perfect but nothing is.
We have metadata laws for a reason so tools are available. Not perfect but nothing is.
that's hunting- target shooting purposes you can pay a fee to the SSAA or any other competition club and no quotas. That said a waste of $100 or so a year if you're not going to go out on a Sunday
December 18, 2025 at 10:52 AM
that's hunting- target shooting purposes you can pay a fee to the SSAA or any other competition club and no quotas. That said a waste of $100 or so a year if you're not going to go out on a Sunday
Cost wise it's not expensivej nor is it overly cheap). A course costs a couple hundred, a 22 or shotgun (Cat A) costs about $1500, a 223, 308 or 6.5 Creedmore (Cat B) costs around $3-5k more if you're serious about target shooting (heavier barrels, better scopes, custom stock etc)
December 18, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Cost wise it's not expensivej nor is it overly cheap). A course costs a couple hundred, a 22 or shotgun (Cat A) costs about $1500, a 223, 308 or 6.5 Creedmore (Cat B) costs around $3-5k more if you're serious about target shooting (heavier barrels, better scopes, custom stock etc)
The simple response is to enforce the laws we have. If you're a proper person you're not on a watch list and you're not a criminal. When ASIO put the son on a watchlist, NSW should have been informed and the guns should have been removed.
December 18, 2025 at 10:43 AM
The simple response is to enforce the laws we have. If you're a proper person you're not on a watch list and you're not a criminal. When ASIO put the son on a watchlist, NSW should have been informed and the guns should have been removed.