Ethan A. Kirchner (Ethie) 🦋🏳️🌈 (he/him/his)
@ethankirchner.bsky.social
31. Artist, animator, writer, director, producer, voice actor, Democrat, autistic, bisexual, and BIPOC lover. Twitter refugee. Founder of KirchnerMation Studios Group.
No Scams! No MAGA! No Clone Bots! No AI! #AntiTrump #Resist #ProWoke #Antifa
No Scams! No MAGA! No Clone Bots! No AI! #AntiTrump #Resist #ProWoke #Antifa
Reposted by Ethan A. Kirchner (Ethie) 🦋🏳️🌈 (he/him/his)
I honestly do not know.
Trump’s administration was already openly denying any court “order” to fund the program, w/ no repercussions.
So if anything, why would it be any different if they just… choose not to fund SNAP even once the government is “open” again? What punishment would they even face?
Trump’s administration was already openly denying any court “order” to fund the program, w/ no repercussions.
So if anything, why would it be any different if they just… choose not to fund SNAP even once the government is “open” again? What punishment would they even face?
November 10, 2025 at 6:04 AM
I honestly do not know.
Trump’s administration was already openly denying any court “order” to fund the program, w/ no repercussions.
So if anything, why would it be any different if they just… choose not to fund SNAP even once the government is “open” again? What punishment would they even face?
Trump’s administration was already openly denying any court “order” to fund the program, w/ no repercussions.
So if anything, why would it be any different if they just… choose not to fund SNAP even once the government is “open” again? What punishment would they even face?