@eversbrendan.bsky.social
I don’t people who produce content for Medium are paid money out of ad revenue in general, they post in order to have an article under their name (i.e. for clout)
January 3, 2026 at 11:16 PM
I don’t people who produce content for Medium are paid money out of ad revenue in general, they post in order to have an article under their name (i.e. for clout)
I don’t think that Medium is monetized; I think it’s just for clout
December 29, 2025 at 5:15 AM
I don’t think that Medium is monetized; I think it’s just for clout
The reason it’s more convenient to monetize is because you can use video ads that block the content which yields higher CPM than banner ads. The inconvenience is what makes it monetizable.
December 28, 2025 at 8:06 PM
The reason it’s more convenient to monetize is because you can use video ads that block the content which yields higher CPM than banner ads. The inconvenience is what makes it monetizable.
I have to admit I always dislike this. Makes it look cool for the referee, but hard to parse and implement. Given examples aren't too bad except for 2, but in general 3D figures would almost always be more clear if they were 2D IMO.
November 11, 2025 at 3:35 PM
I have to admit I always dislike this. Makes it look cool for the referee, but hard to parse and implement. Given examples aren't too bad except for 2, but in general 3D figures would almost always be more clear if they were 2D IMO.
This sounds incorrect, total US consumer spending is ~$19 trillion, ~2/3rds of US GDP. Is the claim here that the growth of investment in data centers is in nominal terms greater than the *growth* in consumer spending? That sounds more reasonable.
August 1, 2025 at 9:08 PM
This sounds incorrect, total US consumer spending is ~$19 trillion, ~2/3rds of US GDP. Is the claim here that the growth of investment in data centers is in nominal terms greater than the *growth* in consumer spending? That sounds more reasonable.
Nice, thanks!
July 20, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Nice, thanks!
I’m gauche enough to ask what it means
July 20, 2025 at 2:06 AM
I’m gauche enough to ask what it means
I think this is true of nearly everyone who is serious about work.
June 5, 2025 at 1:09 PM
I think this is true of nearly everyone who is serious about work.
That’s literally not what I said at all, you’re clearly not backpedaling after being flagrantly wrong and have resorted to baiting for more engagement. This is sad, I am blocking you.
January 26, 2025 at 1:19 AM
That’s literally not what I said at all, you’re clearly not backpedaling after being flagrantly wrong and have resorted to baiting for more engagement. This is sad, I am blocking you.
Smoothbrained take. First and foremost that chat is simply inaccurate; EU defense spending for FY 2024 was €326 billion, or 1.68% of GDP (eda.europa.eu/news-and-eve...). Beyond that, “increasing marginally” is not the same as hitting Rutte’s three percent target from after the invasion.
Latest News
Get all the news about EDA
eda.europa.eu
January 25, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Smoothbrained take. First and foremost that chat is simply inaccurate; EU defense spending for FY 2024 was €326 billion, or 1.68% of GDP (eda.europa.eu/news-and-eve...). Beyond that, “increasing marginally” is not the same as hitting Rutte’s three percent target from after the invasion.
EU defense spending remains under 1.7% of GDP despite years of pledges towards 2 and even 3%. Which universe are the facts you’re referring to located in?
January 25, 2025 at 6:49 PM
EU defense spending remains under 1.7% of GDP despite years of pledges towards 2 and even 3%. Which universe are the facts you’re referring to located in?
They keep on saying they’re going to increase defense spending, but it’s been three years and it never seems to materialize
January 25, 2025 at 4:36 AM
They keep on saying they’re going to increase defense spending, but it’s been three years and it never seems to materialize
This is upcycled antisemitic propaganda from 2016 lol.
January 21, 2025 at 10:51 PM
This is upcycled antisemitic propaganda from 2016 lol.
Isn’t that an interesting effect in and of itself, though?
January 21, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Isn’t that an interesting effect in and of itself, though?
This is a Dune reference, no?
January 19, 2025 at 3:50 PM
This is a Dune reference, no?
Reposted
Aye. There they were in their smart spotty smocks with their dashing Kampfgruppe and clever clever Auftragstaktik and then some FOO who used to be a bank clerk drops an Uncle shoot on their stupid fascist heads.
January 9, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Aye. There they were in their smart spotty smocks with their dashing Kampfgruppe and clever clever Auftragstaktik and then some FOO who used to be a bank clerk drops an Uncle shoot on their stupid fascist heads.
You're right, much easier!
November 21, 2024 at 4:02 PM
You're right, much easier!
I’ve tried crowdsourcing this on Facebook, but so far efforts have proven unsuccessful.
November 20, 2024 at 3:06 PM
I’ve tried crowdsourcing this on Facebook, but so far efforts have proven unsuccessful.