it's just that there is no tech traffic here and this post drew attention. it's funny that the opinions about AI are so polarized.

I'll be writing some new papers on these, so I would welcome any criticism, for instance would you like to explain why Kurzweil was wrong about 2029? Any citations I should see? Thank you. 😇

To remind, my 2030 prediction was concerned with the energy efficiency of computation vastly improving the accuracy of Moravec's predictions. However, Kurzweil made a more intuitive prediction already by early 2000s. I hadn't taken Kurzweil's idea into account but he predicted 2029.

I had predicted the "singularity" by 2035. I think after that, Kurzweil also pre-poned his singularity, but the 2029/2030 prediction for human-level AI was first made many years ago. I wonder why you object to that specific prediction then.

He may be wrong about the timelines, but eventually these predictions aren't wrong. He probably got them from AGI researchers. He isn't exactly making it up.

You are an anonymous account, what do you want to talk about?

We already passed 1.5C and 2C is baked in.

I wonder can I even suggest that the platform is fucking retarded or is that hate speech what kind of imbecility is this?