Never said i was disagreeing. Im saying USA people have cognitive dissonance when it comes to understanding socialized media.
1) they understand checks and balances
2) they think there will be no checks and balances for socialized media

Independent to legislators.

Propaganda system. While it can be a propaganda system in a poorly structured government the same can be said for the executive, legislative and judicial branch.

So if someone can accept that judges can behave independent of legislators then they should be able to accept journalists behaving

Most people believe that the executive, legislative and judicial branches put each other in check to prevent corruption and to much accumulative power. Yet people snuggle to understand that socialized media would be another instrument in the system of checks and balances they think it can only be a

Most people suffer from cognitive dissonance where they believe their government to have checks and balances but think socialized media has none.

>:3

He*

Allowing burly hair trans men into the woman’s washroom means you will not be able to distinguish between cis men and trans men as the below image is a trans man.

Yes. 100%

Im a trans it, cause my pronouns are she/it/her <:3

Bu vicious you mean less painful then slowly dying from cancer cause you were refused treatment?

Thats good you have eachother, your life partner should be your best friend.

I have been doing this for two years with no success. Even in the past when I do this people only want my company when there is no one else and/or they need help.
I have been thinking about asking my doctor for drugs to make me antisocial just so I can get rid of the desire for friendship x3

Ya. i try not to focus on the studies that have shown that those who have not had long term relationships before their 30s will never develop them later on but well it does echo in my head.

No IRL