Fleur GL Helmink
@fglhelmink.bsky.social
82 followers 260 following 16 posts
mental health | emotions | digital phenotyping | bipolar disorder | intergenerational risk PhD candidate Erasmus MC Rotterdam | Fulbright scholar alum The EmoTe Lab, University of Michigan
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
fglhelmink.bsky.social
Very cool paper, Maurizio! Nicely done! Maybe I missed it, but can you guide me to what exact questions you would propose for the 4-question and 8-question S-DERS? :)
fglhelmink.bsky.social
Preprint here: osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thanks to all contributors: @drsarahsperry.bsky.social @eeskevanroekel.bsky.social, Manon Hillegers, and Esther Mesman! ✨

Feedback, questions, or collaboration ideas welcome!

#ESM #MentalHealth #AffectDynamics #DigitalPhenotyping #Psychology #OpenScience
fglhelmink.bsky.social
Our findings suggest a key role for positive affect, showing a clear target for interventions: boost positive emotions to support mood, especially in those most at risk.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
While affect-behavior coupling did not differ by risk or psychopathology group, people with familial risk or recurrent mood disorders did show lower average positive affect and higher average negative affect.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
We also found:
– 😁 More positive affect → less smartphone use later 📱
– 📱 More smartphone use → more negative affect later ☹️

These links held across participants, regardless of familial risk status or history of mood disorders.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
We used Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling to test bidirectional within-person dynamics between affect and behavior.

Key finding:
🚶🏻‍♀️Physical activity ↔ Positive affect 😁
They predicted each other over time.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
Participants completed 14 days of experience sampling (5×/day) and passive sensing.

We tracked:
– Positive & negative affect
– Physical activity
– Smartphone use
fglhelmink.bsky.social
Our sample included 82 adults from the Dutch Bipolar Offspring Study 22-year follow-up, alongside 46 controls without familial risk.

We examined how affect and behavior relate, depending on family risk and history of mood disorders.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
New preprint out now!

We studied how momentary affect and daily life behaviors interact in real time in adults with and without familial risk for mood disorders.

🚶🏻‍♀️📱😁☹️
psyarxivbot.bsky.social
Temporal Dynamics of Affect, Smartphone Use, and Physical Activity in Individuals at Risk for Mood Disorders: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/74fhk_v1
fglhelmink.bsky.social
5️⃣ Early detection is 🔑.

Severe disorders often begin with mild symptoms. Let’s catch them early to provide better outcomes.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
4️⃣ Resilience shines. ✨

Despite challenges, most participants maintained stable jobs and relationships.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
3️⃣ Mental health support matters.

71% sought professional care.
26% used medication.

Accessible support systems are vital for families at risk.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
2️⃣ 65% lifetime mood disorder risk.

Offspring of parents with BD face high risks. MDD cases doubled between ages 28–38.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
1️⃣ BD risk stabilizes after age 30.

No new BD cases emerged after 28. This highlights a critical window for intergenerational risk and early intervention.
fglhelmink.bsky.social
🎉 Honored to receive the Ralph Kupka Penning 2024 from #KenBiS for our 22-year study on offspring of parents with bipolar disorder!

Big thanks to our team (Manon Hillegers & Esther Mesman) and the brave participants who made this possible. 💙

Here’s what we found 👇