fifeenv.bsky.social
@fifeenv.bsky.social
Reposted
There were over 40 journalists there, including I believe from the BBC. I know of at least one from a major media outlet who filed a report, that was then ignored by the editor, something I find deeply disturbing.

Please sign the open letter calling for a televised briefing.
www.nebriefing.org
National Emergency Briefing on climate & nature
An unfiltered assessment of the latest threats to UK food supply, health and national security from eight leading experts to an invitation-only audience - also covering positive solutions. Westminster...
www.nebriefing.org
November 29, 2025 at 3:07 PM
The Clowncil needs to grow enough of a backbone to say that the whole path must not be closed if only part of it is needed for work. They keep half a road open while work is done on one side and can do the same with cycle paths given the will.
November 29, 2025 at 12:16 PM
The City of Edinburgh Clowncil has been indifferent about blocking unnecessary parts of these essential routes for decades, with dangerous "alternatives" officials would not cycle on.

This has been going on since I first used them, when several still had railway ballast surfaces.
November 29, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Reposted
Israel does not believe any other country in the region has any right to sovereignty, or borders, or airspace, or protection from the Israeli military. Israel's posture, aka Israel's illegal occupation of Syrian territory and its repeat attacks towards Syria, is entirely consistent with this.
November 28, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Good work by Mark Ruskell.
November 28, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Reposted
🧵 6/6
There needs to be a cross party discussion on how we can maintain EU alignment and future proof these protections while not opening them up to being watered down completely.
November 28, 2025 at 8:39 AM
Reposted
🧵 5/6
and species that play their part in maintaining our environment.

Stripping away our nature protections will open the door to the rich and the powerful who are trying to exploit our land and seas.

Our nature protections work, it's important they are safeguarded for future generations.
November 28, 2025 at 8:39 AM
Reposted
🧵 4/6
justify why they needed such extreme and extensive new powers and none of the environmental experts who gave evidence to the committee supported them.

No government should be given sweeping powers to remove protections as they see fit. They should be doing more to protect our vital habitats
November 28, 2025 at 8:39 AM
Reposted
🧵 3/6
returns to parliament.

Our natural world is our shared wealth, but Scotland is one of the most nature-depleted countries on earth, and it is our duty to change that. This act is an opportunity for us to secure greater protections for nature, not less.

The Scottish Government could not
November 28, 2025 at 8:39 AM
Reposted
🧵 2/6
would have given all future governments huge and un-precedented powers to re-write laws that h ave protected nature for generations. It's right that parliament has agreed to my amendments today to remove Part 2 and that Ministers will now have to re-think a major part of this bill before it
November 28, 2025 at 8:39 AM
"And last year Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop warned of the financial pressures the Scottish Government faced"

A major such pressure is self-inflicted. Money is being squandered on widening roads like the A9, when there are much better uses to which it could be put.
November 28, 2025 at 3:31 PM