Fil Menczer
@fil.bsky.social
7.1K followers 520 following 310 posts
Researcher on social media misinformation and manipulation, director of the Observatory on Social Media (OSoMe.iu.edu, pronounced “awesome”) at Indiana University
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
Kudos to my wonderful advisors and coworker who made this paper possible! @baottruong.bsky.social @alessandroflammini @fil.bsky.social 🙏
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
We propose that "constructive conflicts" can model healthier, "bridging" content 🌉 But, “destructive conflicts" shouldn't be ignored but approached with careful linguistic choices to transform toxic arguments into productive dialogues.
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
Since destructive conflicts are too important to ignore, we analyze their language 🔍 We find that how something is said matters immensely. Civil language (asking questions, providing detail, and using hedges) makes posts far more resilient to toxicity, while negative language has the opposite effect
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
- Destructive conflicts 🪖 (high C & high TA, panel c) focus on polarizing identity issues like abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.
- Constructive conflicts 🕊️ (high C & low TA, panel d) spark civil debate on policy topics like student loans, AI, and marijuana legalization.
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
To identify constructive conflict, we train two models to score posts based on their likelihood of attracting toxic comments - which we call toxicity attraction (TA) model - and their controversiality - (C) model 💻 Plotting the scores inferred by these models shows clear patterns.
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
We find that a post doesn't need to be toxic to attract toxic comments ☢️ Our Reddit data shows that 47% of non-toxic submissions still attract at least one toxic reply, while only 6% of toxic submissions do. The initial post's content, therefore, is a poor predictor of a comment section's health.
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
In our research, we argue that the key lies in identifying constructive conflict — controversial posts that are toxicity resilient. We define a "toxicity resilient" post as one that is less likely to attract toxic responses from other users. See our #ICWSM2026 paper here arxiv.org/abs/2509.18303 📖
Identifying Constructive Conflict in Online Discussions through Controversial yet Toxicity Resilient Posts
Bridging content that brings together individuals with opposing viewpoints on social media remains elusive, overshadowed by echo chambers and toxic exchanges. We propose that algorithmic curation coul...
arxiv.org
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
A simple solution, prioritizing only “the feel-good" content, is flawed, as it avoids important societal topics that are inherently negative and can devolve into toxic debates. After all, how often does thinking about wars, viruses, or economic policy put a smile on your face?
Reposted by Fil Menczer
ozgurcanseckin.bsky.social
Modern social media is divisive, partly due to recommender algorithms that promote emotionally charged, negative content at the expense of thoughtful discourse. Researchers are exploring prosocial recommenders that foster positive outcomes, aiming for users to feel connected rather than angry 💡
fil.bsky.social
Location moved to IMU State Rooms East and West
fil.bsky.social
Join my OSoMe colleagues and me for a panel on "AI, Social Media, and the New Information Landscape" co-organized by the Center of Excellence for Women & Technology and the Observatory on Social Media.

📅 Wed 24 Sep at 5pm, IMU Oak Room

More info & registration: events.iu.edu/cewit/event/...
AI, Social Media, and the New Information Landscape
In a world where AI can generate headlines, deepfakes, and even entire news articles, how can you tell what’s real? Join us for a panel discussio...
events.iu.edu
fil.bsky.social
Don't forget, we kick off the 2025-2026 OSoMe Awesome Speakers with Patrick Warren today!
fil.bsky.social
🚨 First OSoMe Awesome Speaker of the year! 🚨

📅 Sept 12 | 12pm ET
🎤 Patrick Warren (Clemson University)
📍 Zoom

Measuring the Impact of a Large State-Sponsored Narrative-Laundering Campaign: The case of the Storm-1516 attack on Zelensky

🔗 Register: iu.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
Patrick Warren OSoMe Awsome Speaker
Reposted by Fil Menczer
mluria.bsky.social
It’s not every day that UX researcher whistleblowers testify before the Senate. Yesterday, two former Meta researchers, Jason Sattizahn and Cayce Savage, shared their concerns with safety research for Meta VR products, and more broadly within Meta. So how does UX research move on from here? 🧵
fil.bsky.social
🚨 First OSoMe Awesome Speaker of the year! 🚨

📅 Sept 12 | 12pm ET
🎤 Patrick Warren (Clemson University)
📍 Zoom

Measuring the Impact of a Large State-Sponsored Narrative-Laundering Campaign: The case of the Storm-1516 attack on Zelensky

🔗 Register: iu.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
Patrick Warren OSoMe Awsome Speaker