Alice Fleerackers (she/her)
@fleerackers.bsky.social
760 followers 440 following 380 posts
Writer, researcher, terrible social media user | Assistant Prof @uvahumanities.bsky.social & VP of @pcstnetwork.bsky.social | studying journalism, #scholcomm & #scicomm | she/her
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
fleerackers.bsky.social
Have you ever heard of predatory journals?

Our new study—published this week in Journalism Practice—suggests many science journalists haven't.

When they were familiar with predatory journals, most said they weren't worried, confident they'd "be able to spot one if they saw one."

Details in 🧵👇
Screenshot of journal article titled "I'd like to think I'd be able to spot one": How journalists navigate predatory journals

Authors: Alice Fleerackers, Laura Moorhead, Juan Pablo Alperin
fleerackers.bsky.social
Great opportunity to work with a vibrant and international team, and to make a difference for #openscience and public knowledge.
pkp.sfu.ca
📢Employment opportunity at PKP!

PKP is hiring a Managing Director, who will be responsible for ensuring PKP’s long-term sustainability and continued global impact.

If you are interested, learn more at:
pkp.sfu.ca/2025/09/17/h...
PKP is hiring a Managing Director - Public Knowledge Project
The Public Knowledge Project, a Core Research Facility of SFU, invites applications for the position of Managing Director
pkp.sfu.ca
fleerackers.bsky.social
If you're in Amsterdam and interested in digital media (or just want to leave your house on Monday), come say hi at this FREE event.

@markdeuze.bsky.social , Toni Pape & I will be talking about the weird and sometimes wonderful nature of living life online.

voxpop.uva.nl/en/content/e...
Poster advertising "Pub Talk," including illustration of a face and a bunch of digital devices and phones and details of the event: Speakers: Prof Mark Deuze, Dr Alice Fleerackers, Dr Toni Pape When/where: Sep 30, 16:30-18:30, Vox-Pop
fleerackers.bsky.social
🐕 🐕 🐕 REMINDER 🐕 🐕 🐕

The deadline to submit an abstract to our special issue on "Journalism as a Science Watchdog" is just a couple of weeks away (October 15).

We are really looking forward to reading your submissions!
fleerackers.bsky.social
Interested in researching how journalists experience and grapple with emotions? And how nature retreats might help them better manage the impacts of covering evolving crises?

Come work at the @uvahumanities.bsky.social with the wonderful @johana.bsky.social 👇👇👇
fleerackers.bsky.social
I would love to see more research on this topic!
fleerackers.bsky.social
Reflecting on this thread, I am laughing at the extreme irony of the glaring capitalization error in the title of our paper 😂

Definitely a sign our research is not to be trusted.
Title of the paper "i'd like to think I'd be able to spot one": How journalists navigate predatory journals. The first "I'd" in the title is not capitalized.
fleerackers.bsky.social
The findings are also problematic from a diversity perspective, as they suggest research from smaller, lesser-known, OA journals, and published by researchers whose first language is not English, may remain hidden from public view.
fleerackers.bsky.social
The findings are concerning, because some of these strategies are unlikely to help journalists weed out problematic research.

(See @eve.gd & @ernestopriego.com's great paper on the problems of judging the "container" research is published in: www.triple-c.at/index.php/tr...)
Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers? | tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society
www.triple-c.at
fleerackers.bsky.social
Beyond the reputation and impact factor of a journal, some journalists saw typos/grammar mistakes were "red flags."

Others equated #openaccess with predatory, expressing suspicion about any journal that was free to read.
fleerackers.bsky.social
That gut feeling hinged largely on markers of prestige, impact, and familiarity.

Some journalists, like this one, said they would never report on research from an unfamiliar journal:
Quote from journalist: "I vet research largely by the publication that it's in. So, if it's in a weird publication, I sort of don't know whether to trust it or not. I usually don't, because...I'm like, well it would be in a better publication if it were trustworthy."
fleerackers.bsky.social
Many journalists were unaware of these journals.

Others knew about them but were unconcerned: The journals were a problem in theory, or for their colleagues, but not a problem for them.

With years of experience, they said they had developed a "gut instinct" for telling "good" from "bad" journals.
fleerackers.bsky.social
In the study, we interviewed 23 science, health, and environmental journalists from Europe and North America.

We asked about their perceptions of predatory journals, and what strategies they used to decide if a journal is trustworthy.
fleerackers.bsky.social
Have you ever heard of predatory journals?

Our new study—published this week in Journalism Practice—suggests many science journalists haven't.

When they were familiar with predatory journals, most said they weren't worried, confident they'd "be able to spot one if they saw one."

Details in 🧵👇
Screenshot of journal article titled "I'd like to think I'd be able to spot one": How journalists navigate predatory journals

Authors: Alice Fleerackers, Laura Moorhead, Juan Pablo Alperin
fleerackers.bsky.social
Grateful to see our work on Watchdog Science Journalism featured in @epstoa.bsky.social

Reminder if you're a researcher interested in this space, our special issue for Media and Communication is accepting submissions till October 1!

www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcomm...
fleerackers.bsky.social
But they do not bode well for the future of local (climate) news outlets, who rely heavily on republishing The Conversation stories... but almost never receive any Facebook attention.
fleerackers.bsky.social
The findings are encouraging from a constructive journalism perspective, as positive stories sharing systemic solutions supporting climate emergency preparedness tended to gain lots of traction.
fleerackers.bsky.social
We looked at stories published by The Conversation, which are made available under a Creative Commons license—easily allowing other media outlets to republish them.

(PS. If you are nerdy about methods, you will enjoy this study: tracing these amplification pathways was incredibly involved...)
fleerackers.bsky.social
We also look at the qualities of those republishing outlets (e.g., Are they local, national, or international? Legacy journalism or nontraditional?) that predict whether republished versions of a story get amplified on Facebook.
Overview of pathways through which media stories published by The Conversation (TC) are amplified in a digital media landscape: 

Pathway A: TC stories are posted to Facebook
B) those posts are engaged with by Facebook users
C) TC stories are republished by other media outlets
D) those republished stories are posted to Facebook
E) those posts sharing republished stories are engaged with by Facebook users.
fleerackers.bsky.social
New study — out today in Journalism Practice!

In it, we analyze the qualities of a news story (about climate-related emergencies) that predict whether/how much it is shared/engaged with on Facebook and republished by other media outlets.
Screenshot of journal article titled Amplifying the News: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Republication and Facebook Engagement with News.