Robin Lud
@fleshoversand.bsky.social
Ah, the good old echo of "but if gay seen as normal, what if kids try gay stuff, and are not gay". It's not lifelong commitment, no matter what all sorts of weirdos say. There are thousands of years of history of people being... flexible.
February 16, 2026 at 8:51 PM
Ah, the good old echo of "but if gay seen as normal, what if kids try gay stuff, and are not gay". It's not lifelong commitment, no matter what all sorts of weirdos say. There are thousands of years of history of people being... flexible.
I find the "president Miller" comments less offensive than "would be having brunch if Kamala won" crowd. Those people deserve Trump.
February 16, 2026 at 12:48 AM
I find the "president Miller" comments less offensive than "would be having brunch if Kamala won" crowd. Those people deserve Trump.
"Being an adult" is to give up and drink yourself numb. Maybe consoom your worries away like a good little shitlib.
February 15, 2026 at 8:52 PM
"Being an adult" is to give up and drink yourself numb. Maybe consoom your worries away like a good little shitlib.
"Willingness to enact change" is not even the issue. There needs to be someone who can actually lead and whom people will follow. Through the media and techbro bullshit and other kinds of obstruction.
February 15, 2026 at 8:49 PM
"Willingness to enact change" is not even the issue. There needs to be someone who can actually lead and whom people will follow. Through the media and techbro bullshit and other kinds of obstruction.
And the shit-libbiest of the libs at that.
Electing Newsom will decimate liberal resistance, not even restore a lot of shit destroyed and setup a triumphant comeback for the GOP in 2032.
Even if we are talking "strategic voting", Newsom is a dead end.
Electing Newsom will decimate liberal resistance, not even restore a lot of shit destroyed and setup a triumphant comeback for the GOP in 2032.
Even if we are talking "strategic voting", Newsom is a dead end.
February 15, 2026 at 8:43 PM
And the shit-libbiest of the libs at that.
Electing Newsom will decimate liberal resistance, not even restore a lot of shit destroyed and setup a triumphant comeback for the GOP in 2032.
Even if we are talking "strategic voting", Newsom is a dead end.
Electing Newsom will decimate liberal resistance, not even restore a lot of shit destroyed and setup a triumphant comeback for the GOP in 2032.
Even if we are talking "strategic voting", Newsom is a dead end.
Probably can get some, but US has some nasty means-testing policies which take away hundreds of $ worth of welfare of you are $1 above income threshold. Probably also some cut offs on whether you have a "caretaker" or not.
February 15, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Probably can get some, but US has some nasty means-testing policies which take away hundreds of $ worth of welfare of you are $1 above income threshold. Probably also some cut offs on whether you have a "caretaker" or not.
I have no clue who Garron is, so I imagine that Irish musician who does shorts.
February 15, 2026 at 12:42 PM
I have no clue who Garron is, so I imagine that Irish musician who does shorts.
It's not. Biden is older than commercial passenger air travel.
February 14, 2026 at 7:56 PM
It's not. Biden is older than commercial passenger air travel.
That's not average. As far as somewhat objective measure goes, he is physically attractive.
It's the whole "looksmaxxing" attitude that's a problem.
It's the whole "looksmaxxing" attitude that's a problem.
February 14, 2026 at 7:52 PM
That's not average. As far as somewhat objective measure goes, he is physically attractive.
It's the whole "looksmaxxing" attitude that's a problem.
It's the whole "looksmaxxing" attitude that's a problem.
Him in power will decimate resistance and solidify GOP gains. He is too spineless to overturn shit Trump's handlers has pushed through.
And he will set everything up for triumphant republican comeback in 2032.
Fuck Gavin Newsom.
And he will set everything up for triumphant republican comeback in 2032.
Fuck Gavin Newsom.
February 14, 2026 at 5:50 PM
Him in power will decimate resistance and solidify GOP gains. He is too spineless to overturn shit Trump's handlers has pushed through.
And he will set everything up for triumphant republican comeback in 2032.
Fuck Gavin Newsom.
And he will set everything up for triumphant republican comeback in 2032.
Fuck Gavin Newsom.
I don't give a single shit whether he is electable or not. Outside of some pretty extreme circumstances, he is perfectly electable in 2028.
People talk about "strategic voting", and in that context I prefer most republicans to Newsom.
People talk about "strategic voting", and in that context I prefer most republicans to Newsom.
February 14, 2026 at 5:46 PM
I don't give a single shit whether he is electable or not. Outside of some pretty extreme circumstances, he is perfectly electable in 2028.
People talk about "strategic voting", and in that context I prefer most republicans to Newsom.
People talk about "strategic voting", and in that context I prefer most republicans to Newsom.
>The American right does not defend slavery because progressives say it was bad.
They sort of do. For decades republicans has been a "own the libs" party. They take contrarian position and create culture wars out of dumbest shit.
They sort of do. For decades republicans has been a "own the libs" party. They take contrarian position and create culture wars out of dumbest shit.
February 14, 2026 at 3:33 PM
>The American right does not defend slavery because progressives say it was bad.
They sort of do. For decades republicans has been a "own the libs" party. They take contrarian position and create culture wars out of dumbest shit.
They sort of do. For decades republicans has been a "own the libs" party. They take contrarian position and create culture wars out of dumbest shit.
Billionaires are not a "minority". It's not just about the number. The 1% wields well over 50% of power. That's not a minority.
February 13, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Billionaires are not a "minority". It's not just about the number. The 1% wields well over 50% of power. That's not a minority.
Hot take! I prefer Vance to Newsom. Electing latter would decimate liberal resistance and cement GOP gains.
February 13, 2026 at 5:05 PM
Hot take! I prefer Vance to Newsom. Electing latter would decimate liberal resistance and cement GOP gains.
I'm not taking advice from parts of the problem like the Roblox guy. It's not ok for his kids, but making money is cool? To gulag.
Again, the issue is the scope. Parents in 2000s and earlier had it easy. Kids spent hours outside with no supervision. Helicopter parents were rightfully mocked.
Again, the issue is the scope. Parents in 2000s and earlier had it easy. Kids spent hours outside with no supervision. Helicopter parents were rightfully mocked.
February 12, 2026 at 4:20 PM
I'm not taking advice from parts of the problem like the Roblox guy. It's not ok for his kids, but making money is cool? To gulag.
Again, the issue is the scope. Parents in 2000s and earlier had it easy. Kids spent hours outside with no supervision. Helicopter parents were rightfully mocked.
Again, the issue is the scope. Parents in 2000s and earlier had it easy. Kids spent hours outside with no supervision. Helicopter parents were rightfully mocked.
We can stop treating neiliberals as the only alternative to fascists and the battle will get easier.
Shit sucks. People want and need actual change. Ignoring that will not defeat the fash, as proven by Hillary and Kamala. Best they can do is treating places with fash once people are tired of either
Shit sucks. People want and need actual change. Ignoring that will not defeat the fash, as proven by Hillary and Kamala. Best they can do is treating places with fash once people are tired of either
February 12, 2026 at 3:53 PM
We can stop treating neiliberals as the only alternative to fascists and the battle will get easier.
Shit sucks. People want and need actual change. Ignoring that will not defeat the fash, as proven by Hillary and Kamala. Best they can do is treating places with fash once people are tired of either
Shit sucks. People want and need actual change. Ignoring that will not defeat the fash, as proven by Hillary and Kamala. Best they can do is treating places with fash once people are tired of either
It's on the more generic side. Parks&Rec did it better.
February 12, 2026 at 11:00 AM
It's on the more generic side. Parks&Rec did it better.
Parents do need some degree of control.
February 12, 2026 at 10:34 AM
Parents do need some degree of control.
Trackmania. Peaks are relatively low. Lives mostly off of community. And like one upper mid tier or low high tier streamer. Based on seasonal campaign numbers, >800k players on first free map, >200k on first premium ($20/yr).
February 12, 2026 at 2:11 AM
Trackmania. Peaks are relatively low. Lives mostly off of community. And like one upper mid tier or low high tier streamer. Based on seasonal campaign numbers, >800k players on first free map, >200k on first premium ($20/yr).
Who "they"? Services? Some would like to have a less janky way to interact with customers. Potentially less data to handle with less liability. Those that want the data I don't give a fuck what they want.
February 12, 2026 at 2:02 AM
Who "they"? Services? Some would like to have a less janky way to interact with customers. Potentially less data to handle with less liability. Those that want the data I don't give a fuck what they want.
It's a vote for the next incarnation of Trump.
February 11, 2026 at 11:19 PM
It's a vote for the next incarnation of Trump.
The solutions are braindead basic, depending on how much you want government to know. Again, a service anonymously requesting some data through user and ID server encrypting response with a private key, while public key is available.
February 11, 2026 at 10:02 PM
The solutions are braindead basic, depending on how much you want government to know. Again, a service anonymously requesting some data through user and ID server encrypting response with a private key, while public key is available.
I'm more worried about janky authentication by not fit for purpose methods and giving away unnecessary data to multiple companies, each having, let's be generous, 10% chance of a leak per year.
I don't want to give discord or their partners a photo of me or my ID. Simple as. Fucking do it right.
I don't want to give discord or their partners a photo of me or my ID. Simple as. Fucking do it right.
February 11, 2026 at 5:53 PM
I'm more worried about janky authentication by not fit for purpose methods and giving away unnecessary data to multiple companies, each having, let's be generous, 10% chance of a leak per year.
I don't want to give discord or their partners a photo of me or my ID. Simple as. Fucking do it right.
I don't want to give discord or their partners a photo of me or my ID. Simple as. Fucking do it right.
You are missing the point. I'm not saying that ALL online services should demand your ID. Nor am I saying that you should broadcast your personal data at anyone and everyone. I am saying that having a fit for purpose digital ID system is better than current dumb methods that spread your data around.
February 11, 2026 at 12:31 PM
You are missing the point. I'm not saying that ALL online services should demand your ID. Nor am I saying that you should broadcast your personal data at anyone and everyone. I am saying that having a fit for purpose digital ID system is better than current dumb methods that spread your data around.
Banking and financial stuff to start with? Other services that require you actual identity? Healthcare, job searching etc. I'm not the biggest fan of age-gating social media, but if that's the only option workable...
Online is not a separate world anymore.
Online is not a separate world anymore.
February 11, 2026 at 12:05 PM
Banking and financial stuff to start with? Other services that require you actual identity? Healthcare, job searching etc. I'm not the biggest fan of age-gating social media, but if that's the only option workable...
Online is not a separate world anymore.
Online is not a separate world anymore.