Steve Smith
@fmrib-steve.bsky.social
690 followers 230 following 57 posts
Brain imaging research, Oxford EiC, Imaging Neuroscience https://bsky.app/profile/imagingneurosci.bsky.social
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Steve Smith
northernthrux.bsky.social
I often think about the fact that all the universities in 🇨🇦 together did not produce 11 Nobel Prizes in that period (or since). Not from a lack of brilliance, but from a lack of steady funding and the insistence on significant teaching loads and mind-numbing committee memberships for all faculty.
kevinjkircher.com
Sometimes I think about how from 1935-1975ish, Bell Labs produced an insane amount of revolutionary science and technology, including 11 Nobel Prizes, the transistor, UNIX, C, the laser, the solar cell, information theory, etc. The secret? Provide scientists with ample, steady, no-strings funding.
sites.stat.columbia.edu
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
I think your scanner's A2D scaling is set a little high :-)
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
We had published a similar plot in the early UKB brain imaging paper from @fmrib-karla.bsky.social - so this is just a quick update on that. My how the y axis has grown up!

www.nature.com/articles/nn....
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Yes and maybe:

It's easy to screen them out (ignore those associations) given that all the non-brain-imaging variables are organised into nice categories.

One might also want to include body size variables as confounds, (though we do by default already use overall head size as a confound).
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Latest processing of UK Biobank brain imaging data - now with 82,000 usable first-scan datasets. Correlating brain IDPs with 13,000 non-imaging variables gives a rich manhattan-stye plot. 324,000 Bonferroni-significant associations.
Reposted by Steve Smith
wamsleylab.bsky.social
Where is the money going? In the case of for-profit publishers it's very clear:

Your open access fees fund corporate profit margins.

Profit margins for large academic publishers can far exceed those of household names like Amazon and Apple.

chart source: bit.ly/4leULKi
#scipub #academicsky
Chart shows profit margin for Elsevier is 38%, for Springer-Nature is 27%... this is in comparison to companies like Apple (25%), Amazon (5%)... There are non-publishing companies like Microsoft with big margins (34%), but overall the chart shows that academic publishing companies have surprisingly large profits when compared to more "famous" large companies that are household names. "Source" line says "yahoo finance, RELX investor presentations, Spring Nature Annual Reports
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
How about if the journal inserts a hidden message into a paper sent for review, with instructions to the LLM to write a coded message in the review, so the journal can tell if LLM was used by the reviewer?
Reposted by Steve Smith
cercamagnetics.bsky.social
Congratulations to Holly Schofield and @curlyryes.bsky.social for being chosen from over 350 papers that were published by @imagingneurosci.bsky.social in 2024.

Holly accepted the award at OHBM in Brisbane and Ryan celebrated the win from Dublin!

www.nottingham.ac.uk/news/scienti...
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Indeed - and apparently I'm only allowed to view the award from three pre-specified angles.
:-)
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
It's *easier* than that - just publish in an OA journal that lets the author keep the copyright :-)
Reposted by Steve Smith
timsout.bsky.social
It's Pride Month. On the weekend, we were delighted to have a Pride breakfast celebrating lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer members of the University of Oxford. And then proceeded to join the Oxford Pride parade. The weather was wet -- but that didn't dampen spirits
Reposted by Steve Smith
paulacroxson.bsky.social
🧪 Scientists are pushing back against the gutting of US research funding. Now scientists outside of the NIH and members of the public can sign on in support of the Bethesda declaration: www.standupforscience.net/bethesda-dec...

More about the Bethesda declaration: apnews.com/article/nih-...
Bethesda Declaration — STAND UP FOR SCIENCE
Support NIH Staff Now!
www.standupforscience.net
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
I guess the main difference between social media and the BBC is that you won't see "popcorn" on any BBC pages today?
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
YOU know what I meant :-)
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Indeed - and Oxford Labour just as bad, concreting over every bit of green they can, destroying the countryside for future generations.
@cllrsbrown.bsky.social
@maryoxford.bsky.social
@annarailton.bsky.social
Reposted by Steve Smith
oxcin.bsky.social
🏳️‍🌈Happy Pride Month from OxCIN! 🏳️‍🌈

If you're in Oxford, come and say hi at our inclusive research-themed stall at the Pride festival in South Park this Saturday!
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
We present a method for disambiguating subject-varying aging rates from fixed baseline effects, in single-timepoint data.

If estimating a single brain age delta per subject, baseline effects dominate.

With multiple modes of brain aging, some modes do reflect aging rates varying across subjects.
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
For those curious about how it works at IN: editors can't see their own papers in the reviewing system. So I don't even know who the Handling Editor was (or the reviewers) - but thanks to them all for helping improve the paper.
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Happy to see my first first-author paper in Imaging Neuroscience (along with @fmrib-karla.bsky.social and @nichols.bsky.social):

Characterising ongoing brain aging and baseline effects from cross-sectional data

doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
sunny spring day yesterday - time for some macro pics in the garden
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
Not *always* so cute!
fmrib-steve.bsky.social
First trip to The Mainland