FoxCub.621
banner
foxcub621.bsky.social
FoxCub.621
@foxcub621.bsky.social
weird/NSFW shit, hewe be dwagonz >:3
20 irl, cubbwy onwine uwu


"abc, xyz... dni" ppl pwease hecc off!
Reposted by FoxCub.621
Gonna go run some errands, take a bath and organize my place a bit. Feel like being inside sulking isn't helping hahaha.
December 12, 2025 at 11:12 PM
Reposted by FoxCub.621
And we already know that Facebook will be on board with "reforming" Section 230 in a way that makes them the winners, because Mark Zuckerberg *said so*. In front of Congress.

www.techdirt.com/2020/10/27/z...
Zuckerberg And Facebook Throw The Open Internet Under The Bus; Support Section 230 Reform
This shouldn’t be much of a surprise, unfortunately, but it appears that once again Facebook is the first to crack under political pressure, and has decided to sell out the open internet and …
www.techdirt.com
December 12, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Reposted by FoxCub.621
It's a bad idea, being advanced under the guise of "holding Big Tech accountable". In reality, the super-rich will benefit and every attempt to build a new kind of social media (Bluesky, Mastodon, etc., etc.) will suffer.

Put it this way: Wikipedia needs Section 230.

medium.com/wikimedia-po...
If Congress Repeals Section 230, What Will that Mean for Wikipedia?
This is the first installment in our three-part series about Section 230.
medium.com
December 12, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by FoxCub.621
There are mixed messages coming at us on if this is a great thing (potential to hold tech cos accountable) and that this is an awful idea (those same tech cos will now censor user posts). Can anyone clarify?
December 12, 2025 at 5:01 PM