@fra9k7
@fra9k7.bsky.social
Toryism is the dark side of our nature.
Used to be @frank___7 on the eX site!
I follow, you chat - I block.
Used to be @frank___7 on the eX site!
I follow, you chat - I block.
His thumbs are well protected.
December 22, 2025 at 5:47 PM
His thumbs are well protected.
The reckless media (inc the Beeb) have pandered to Farage for a generation now.
Seemed harmless enough 20 years ago "What a character, eh?"
But it was relentless.
The Mail and Telegraph types don't really give a damn.
Their owners are insulated from his consequences.
And HE thinks he's winning.
Seemed harmless enough 20 years ago "What a character, eh?"
But it was relentless.
The Mail and Telegraph types don't really give a damn.
Their owners are insulated from his consequences.
And HE thinks he's winning.
December 21, 2025 at 9:27 AM
The reckless media (inc the Beeb) have pandered to Farage for a generation now.
Seemed harmless enough 20 years ago "What a character, eh?"
But it was relentless.
The Mail and Telegraph types don't really give a damn.
Their owners are insulated from his consequences.
And HE thinks he's winning.
Seemed harmless enough 20 years ago "What a character, eh?"
But it was relentless.
The Mail and Telegraph types don't really give a damn.
Their owners are insulated from his consequences.
And HE thinks he's winning.
Yes - we thought the contrast with the tories would have been as stark as when Blair came in after the Thatcher/Major years.
Have they lost their labour mojo?
Have they lost their labour mojo?
December 21, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Yes - we thought the contrast with the tories would have been as stark as when Blair came in after the Thatcher/Major years.
Have they lost their labour mojo?
Have they lost their labour mojo?
The Bear is right. Now.
He is saying he will not vote for today's Labour.
If they don't change they won't get his vote.
I would agree.
(defining position? - their assistance in genocide)
He is saying he will not vote for today's Labour.
If they don't change they won't get his vote.
I would agree.
(defining position? - their assistance in genocide)
December 20, 2025 at 4:03 PM
The Bear is right. Now.
He is saying he will not vote for today's Labour.
If they don't change they won't get his vote.
I would agree.
(defining position? - their assistance in genocide)
He is saying he will not vote for today's Labour.
If they don't change they won't get his vote.
I would agree.
(defining position? - their assistance in genocide)
How many MPs were bought by Russian money?
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)
December 19, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Reposted by @fra9k7
Reposted by @fra9k7
This is exactly mirroring the support given to the blackshirts by the rightwing rags of the '30s.
Traitors then
Traitors now
Traitors then
Traitors now
December 18, 2025 at 6:01 PM
This is exactly mirroring the support given to the blackshirts by the rightwing rags of the '30s.
Traitors then
Traitors now
Traitors then
Traitors now
Also was undermined by BBC as a Russian sympathiser.
December 18, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Also was undermined by BBC as a Russian sympathiser.
How many MPs were bought by Russian money?
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)
December 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM
How many MPs were bought by Russian money?
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)
Conservative Friends of Russia?
(If there's money sloshing around, Conservatives will step forward and be its friend)