B) An individual having committed another crime isn't allowed as evidence that they committed the crime they're being charged with (I think) and it seems reasonable that this would be the same inverted. Flying super blind tho cus I haven't even had Strafrecht in Switzerland, let alone in the US.

I’m gonna go with c. We haven’t covered this in class yet so I’m just guessing. Art.11 of our constitution ensures some special protections for minors. (Unversehrtheit, Förderung von Entwicklung etc) (Have fun) It worked last time so I'm just going to assume Swiss law will work here as well.

I'm going with a) using Swiss law which may or may not apply. Here when a contract is formed "unter anwesenden" meaning either in person or over the phone it is only valid for as long as the conversation lasts. Also thank you/curse you (Dunno yet) for being part of the reason I want to study law.

audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.
audiobooks count as reading.

Russia doesn't understand basic concepts.

Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you. One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order. No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
#BookSky💙📚
#Books
#BookChallenge

8/20

Rousseau and Hobbes should have just fucked

Please read books. I’m begging you.

I feel mislead by all dystopian literature. It's supposed to be a powerful authoritarian government that lords over a cowering population, and and we just need need a few brave acts of heroism to give the people the courage to rise up.

Instead it's just half the country being dumb and mean.