rBST (the hormone that is used to boost milk production) has been banned in Canada.
This is another example of Trump being clueless.

Poilievre needs to put the national interests of the country above his political survival.

the effectiveness and authority of the opposition bloc he represents. As a result, there's an increasing call amongst peers for a shift toward more authentic and constructive political engagement underpinned by substance over style.

problem-solving, Poillievre risks alienating constituents who value integrity and competence in their leaders. Furthermore, his penchant for grandstanding detracts from opportunities for meaningful policy engagement with the ruling government and other stakeholders, ultimately undermining

of superficiality rather than genuine governance intentions. This approach has not only alienated potential allies within his party but also diminished trust among voters who seek earnest political discourse and solutions to pressing issues. By focusing on spectacle rather than collaborative

Pierre Poillivre's political tactics, characterized by excessive showboating and media-centric maneuvers, have notably weakened the credibility of the opposition. His strategy often prioritizes attention-grabbing stunts over substantive policy debates, leading to public perception

sustainability, and inclusivity. Thus, an adept opposition serves not only as a watchdog but also as a collaborative partner in crafting frameworks that advance national interests while safeguarding democratic processes.

opposition parties can influence policymaking positively, steering it towards balanced decisions that consider diverse perspectives.
Their vigilance deters potential governmental overreach and fosters an environment where policies are consistently evaluated for socioeconomic impact,

that could enhance governance.
Through rigorous debate and presenting alternative solutions, the opposition contributes to a more comprehensive legislative process, ultimately benefiting the electorate. By offering evidence-based critiques and pragmatic proposals,