Fabian Hoffmann
@frhoffmann.bsky.social
16K followers 530 following 790 posts
Doctoral Research Fellow at the Oslo Nuclear Project, University of Oslo. Defense policy, missile technology, and nuclear strategy. Weekly analysis of missile tech, nuclear strategy, and European deterrence 👇 https://missilematters.substack.com/subscribe
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Hi all,

I published my latest Missile Matters post earlier today, examining the reported drop in Ukraine’s ballistic missile intercept rate from 37 to 6 percent, as covered by the Financial Times.

Access the full post here:

missilematters.substack.com/p/what-happe...

Short summary below.

1/6
What Happened to Ukraine's Ballistic Missile Defense? Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
missilematters.substack.com
Reposted by Fabian Hoffmann
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Hi all,

I published my latest Missile Matters post earlier today, examining the reported drop in Ukraine’s ballistic missile intercept rate from 37 to 6 percent, as covered by the Financial Times.

Access the full post here:

missilematters.substack.com/p/what-happe...

Short summary below.

1/6
What Happened to Ukraine's Ballistic Missile Defense? Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
missilematters.substack.com
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Many thanks! I'm trying to hit that sweet spot between nerdy analysis and something that also average people not part of our field can follow.
Reposted by Fabian Hoffmann
corporalfrisk.com
I subscribe to too many emails, but one of the few I actually read is Missile Matters. It’s suitably geeky, and provides a deeper understanding of missile warfare which is a topic you see discussed surprisingly often in news and social media these days 😅

This week’s conclusions are spot on.
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Ukraine’s interceptor shortage may also contribute to the drop in intercept rates, though this does not explain why rates remained significantly higher in August, given that the shortage has been a persistent issue for months.

In the end, the drop likely relates to a confluence of factors.

6/6
frhoffmann.bsky.social
However, the drop in intercept rates may also be primarily explained by Russia targeting non-defended areas.

Since Ukraine doesn't publish data on how many BMs were actually engaged, it is ultimately impossible to distinguish between attempted and non-attempted intercepts.

5/6
frhoffmann.bsky.social
A steeper trajectory, compared to a more shallow one, may trade lateral maneuverability for greater vertical momentum and reduced reaction time.

Given that the PAC-3 MSE is agile and can compensate for lateral movements relatively well, this may be a worthwhile tradeoff.

4/6
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Nevertheless, it is reported that trajectory adaptations, most notably steeper trajectories, are now being used to better circumvent Ukraine’s ballistic missile defense.

This is at least somewhat plausible, though it cannot be fully confirmed from the outside.

3/6
frhoffmann.bsky.social
First, the fact that Russian ballistic missiles can maneuver is neither new nor surprising. Western ballistic missile defense interceptors, including the PAC-2 GEM-T, PAC-3 MSE, and Aster 30B1/B1NG, were specifically designed with this threat profile in mind.

2/6
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Hi all,

I published my latest Missile Matters post earlier today, examining the reported drop in Ukraine’s ballistic missile intercept rate from 37 to 6 percent, as covered by the Financial Times.

Access the full post here:

missilematters.substack.com/p/what-happe...

Short summary below.

1/6
What Happened to Ukraine's Ballistic Missile Defense? Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
Explaining the Reported Drop in Patriot's Effectiveness
missilematters.substack.com
frhoffmann.bsky.social
I’ve written a short piece on the recent reported drop in Ukraine’s ballistic missile defense intercept rate.

It will be published tomorrow morning on my Missile Matters blog. You can sign up here to receive it directly in your inbox.

missilematters.substack.com/subscribe
frhoffmann.bsky.social
European defense manufacturer Helsing presented the CA-1 Europa, a UCAV reportedly capable of performing a range of missions, including deep precision strike.

First test flight expected in 2027.
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing!

Yes it's an insane effort. I was once told by a mini jet engine manufacturer that sometimes an engine doesn't work and they can't figure out why that's the case. Then they just have to throw it away.
frhoffmann.bsky.social
So this might sustain the 50 per month number for 2 to 4 months, which is why localization of production and vertical integration is critical.

Good to hear that Fire Point is moving in that direction.

I still maintain that 20 engines per month would be significant, if it can be achieved.

2/2
frhoffmann.bsky.social
This seems extremely odd. Even if NATO were to shoot down aircraft, that doesn't automatically mean nuclear war.

Who even is the author?
frhoffmann.bsky.social
The documents show 2.373 billion euros in funding for Taurus NEO.

This is similar to the 2.1 billion euros reported by Spiegel 11 months ago for 600 missiles. The slight increase may reflect higher material costs or a somewhat larger number of missiles being ordered

www.politico.eu/article/germ...
Germany’s €80B rearmament plan sidelines US weapons
A procurement plan obtained by POLITICO shows Berlin’s rearmament spree will overwhelmingly benefit European industry.
www.politico.eu
Reposted by Fabian Hoffmann
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Hi all,

I just published my latest Missile Matters post on the precarious state of Europe's mini jet engine industry, a sector that is critical to Europe's missile rearmament but remains underappreciated.

Access the post here:
missilematters.substack.com/p/small-thru...

Short summary below.

1/7
Small Thrust, Big Questions: Why Europe is Falling Behind in Cruise Missile Engine Technology
Europe's missile rearmament faces a critical bottleneck in mini jet engine production
missilematters.substack.com
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Its okay, I just had a German general explain to me that Germany doesn't need to invest in conventional long-range strike weapons because the United States is our ally 🙃
frhoffmann.bsky.social
European decisionmakers need to start taking cruise missile engine production seriously.

The necessity may not be immediately as clear as building a new artillery shell plant, but it is just as urgently needed.

7/7
frhoffmann.bsky.social
This means European cruise missile programs, including the Taurus KEPD 350 and the Joint Strike Missile, will continue to depend on U.S. turbofan manufacturers for the foreseeable future, which is far from ideal from a strategic autonomy perspective.

6/7
frhoffmann.bsky.social
Even more problematic, European industry does not have an indigenous mini turbofan to offer.

While European engine makers, including Safran, MTU, and Rolls-Royce, build or contribute to turbofan engines for aircraft, none have gone through the process of miniaturization.

5/7
frhoffmann.bsky.social
However, Safran only supplies high-end turbojet engines that are not suitable for the large numbers of lighter cruise missiles Europe will require.

This is why the Czech manufacturer PBS, which produces suitable engines, but is orienting itself toward the US, is bad news for Europe.

4/7