fwiwblog
@fwiwblog.bsky.social
A safe space for common sense.
Contextualising local news beyond the limits of our infamous nine-day memory.
Contextualising local news beyond the limits of our infamous nine-day memory.
The relevant section of the regulations:
January 5, 2025 at 2:50 PM
The relevant section of the regulations:
Relevant article #2:
When I say that our problems are solvable and that our leaders have the solutions, this is what I mean.
The Nat Sec Ministry let the 3yo programme lapse in 2022. In 2024, they're scrambling to handle a spike in violence and talking about reinstating it.
When I say that our problems are solvable and that our leaders have the solutions, this is what I mean.
The Nat Sec Ministry let the 3yo programme lapse in 2022. In 2024, they're scrambling to handle a spike in violence and talking about reinstating it.
January 5, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Relevant article #2:
When I say that our problems are solvable and that our leaders have the solutions, this is what I mean.
The Nat Sec Ministry let the 3yo programme lapse in 2022. In 2024, they're scrambling to handle a spike in violence and talking about reinstating it.
When I say that our problems are solvable and that our leaders have the solutions, this is what I mean.
The Nat Sec Ministry let the 3yo programme lapse in 2022. In 2024, they're scrambling to handle a spike in violence and talking about reinstating it.
Relevant article #1:
As they say, the function of a system is what it does.
So I know the ppl quoted here, the ppl actually trying to help, know precisely why a govt that claims to care about crime would spend public money on crime-fighting measures that seem designed to fail.
Do *we* know why?
As they say, the function of a system is what it does.
So I know the ppl quoted here, the ppl actually trying to help, know precisely why a govt that claims to care about crime would spend public money on crime-fighting measures that seem designed to fail.
Do *we* know why?
January 5, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Relevant article #1:
As they say, the function of a system is what it does.
So I know the ppl quoted here, the ppl actually trying to help, know precisely why a govt that claims to care about crime would spend public money on crime-fighting measures that seem designed to fail.
Do *we* know why?
As they say, the function of a system is what it does.
So I know the ppl quoted here, the ppl actually trying to help, know precisely why a govt that claims to care about crime would spend public money on crime-fighting measures that seem designed to fail.
Do *we* know why?
An object lesson in the power of language and how dangerous it can be when it is used for misdirection:
A police officer who "misbehaves" IS a criminal. So to give them extra powers IS to give criminals the benefit.
www.guardian.co.tt/news/rowley-...
A police officer who "misbehaves" IS a criminal. So to give them extra powers IS to give criminals the benefit.
www.guardian.co.tt/news/rowley-...
January 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM
An object lesson in the power of language and how dangerous it can be when it is used for misdirection:
A police officer who "misbehaves" IS a criminal. So to give them extra powers IS to give criminals the benefit.
www.guardian.co.tt/news/rowley-...
A police officer who "misbehaves" IS a criminal. So to give them extra powers IS to give criminals the benefit.
www.guardian.co.tt/news/rowley-...
Once again, if your laws cannot stand up to legal challenges, then your laws are flawed. If the TTPS (the org charged with upholding the law) cannot be effective within the bounds of the law, then it has some SERIOUS problems.
Let's address that instead of all this pretense.
Let's address that instead of all this pretense.
January 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Once again, if your laws cannot stand up to legal challenges, then your laws are flawed. If the TTPS (the org charged with upholding the law) cannot be effective within the bounds of the law, then it has some SERIOUS problems.
Let's address that instead of all this pretense.
Let's address that instead of all this pretense.
And to respond to the failure to protect a special prosecutor with what amounts to "it's not like this is the first time" and then essentially say "but don't worry, we gotchu" is a CHOICE.
January 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM
And to respond to the failure to protect a special prosecutor with what amounts to "it's not like this is the first time" and then essentially say "but don't worry, we gotchu" is a CHOICE.
You're 100% right about that and please believe they WILL be pulling plays from it because they've been plagiarizing the American right for a long time.
January 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
You're 100% right about that and please believe they WILL be pulling plays from it because they've been plagiarizing the American right for a long time.