Jan Gebauer
@gebauer.bsky.social
110 followers 28 following 38 posts
Structural biologist studying interactions in the #ECMatrix at atomic levels #ProteinCrystallography at @UniCologne. Also at https://x.com/jan_gebauer and
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gebauer.bsky.social
First full day of the #GRC #Collagen, obviously can't share anything, but there were already amazing talks!
Photo into the lecture hall of for the GRC Collagen
gebauer.bsky.social
This sounds really interesting! Eager to test it with some structures we have lying around. 👍
gcorso.bsky.social
Excited to unveil Boltz-2, our new model capable not only of predicting structures but also binding affinities! Boltz-2 is the first AI model to approach the performance of FEP simulations while being more than 1000x faster! All open-sourced under MIT license! A thread… 🤗🚀
gebauer.bsky.social
Okay, it's officially summer in Cologne, when I have to move our CryoEM machine from my office to an air conditioned room... ☀️(In Winter I am using it's heat for saving a little on heaters)
Reposted by Jan Gebauer
rmcarpiano.medsky.social
Do we really age in bursts like that recent study suggests? @drjenndowd.bsky.social yet again provides a terrific overview and explainer of that study.
🛟🧪 medsky 😷demography sociology
Are we really aging in bursts?
If you are nearing 44 or 60, don't panic.
jenndowd.substack.com
gebauer.bsky.social
Thanks for this! The study was all over the news in Germany, but somehow I never cared to check. As a scientist myself I really should have 🙄 Overselling scientific findings is really a problem in our days - it decreases trust in the scientific process...
gebauer.bsky.social
Und ich dachte es sei ein Witz... 😂 Olli glaube ich auch, oder zumindest hat er so getan...
gebauer.bsky.social
There is an #science feed and #ML in structural biology feed, but is there an protein #crystallography feed? And if not would we need one 🤔
gebauer.bsky.social
Only have some slides to explain protein domains and the importance to predict those to a public audience. Not sure if those help... 🤷‍♂️
gebauer.bsky.social
Full ack... Sadly the AI proponents often do not share our caution 😉
gebauer.bsky.social
I see your point, but I've heard this argument to often. "AF is different? - maybe just an important different confomer!" I do agree that crystal artefact exists and maybe this one deviation is upsold a little bit in the article, but in principle it's important to strengthen experimental strubio.
gebauer.bsky.social
Is Folding@Home still a thing? I have the impression neuronal network based methods have outpaced the energy based prediction software so far....or did they change the basis for the client? 🤔
gebauer.bsky.social
Not so fond of the war theme, but I agree with the message👍. I see so many projects just doing fancy -omics, trying to solve mechanisms - but sometimes you just have to get your hands dirty and purify that f*** protein.
gebauer.bsky.social
room for improvement - it is an essential part of the scientific progress... So, is this just me?
gebauer.bsky.social
Don't get me wrong, the study seems legit and I am eager to dig into it. Although every bit of focus on collagens research is great. But I don't like this "new" trend on reporting on practically unpublished results. I think we have a peer-review system for a reason and while there might be (2/n)
gebauer.bsky.social
I am a structural biologist working with collagens, so naturally I am very interested. I only had time to skim over the paper, but I have to admit I currently fail to see why this is _major_ news. Especially, as it is not yet peer-reviewed. I frankly have more questions than answers (1/n)
gebauer.bsky.social
I have the feeling that we lived in the golden age of medicine, already before AF. Knockouts mice, crispr/cas, mRNA vacs.These are all tremendous developments - independent of AF. Don't get me wrong: I am a structural biologist and use AF every day. It's great, but medicine was great already before
Reposted by Jan Gebauer
matrixbiologie.bsky.social
Congratulations to this year’s winner of the Young Investigator Award: Kristina Bubb from Cologne! @nystromlab.bsky.social
gebauer.bsky.social
Thanks! Finally I found it... 🥰 Somehow, expected it would be coot-1 or something along that line...
gebauer.bsky.social
Hi, could you please add me to the science feed? I am a structural biologist. You'll find the University facility I supervise here px.uni-koeln.de and papers on my own page Gebauer.koeln thanks a lot!
RG Baumann
px.uni-koeln.de
gebauer.bsky.social
I also thought about protein structures, but there is no left-handed alpha helix 🤔 but maybe that's the point? On the other hand the zigzag is not disordered... Frankly no idea... From which science area is it?
gebauer.bsky.social
And still, it's relatively often wrong - at least for protein complexes 😉
Reposted by Jan Gebauer
rolanddunbrack.bsky.social
I added support for Boltz1 so we can calculate ipSAE and other scores for pairwise protein-protein interactions on AF2, AF3, and Boltz1 models. Will add nucleic acids eventually. github.com/DunbrackLab/...
gebauer.bsky.social
This sounds interesting and maybe exactly what I need. Plan to di some screening with #AF3 and a proper implementation ofna scoring function was still missing 👍 thanks!