Genica
@genicadune.bsky.social
Pfp by @jayeallisonashtear.bsky.social
I feel like a mod solely to make the female secretary character curvier is the sort of thing we should be mocking.
January 5, 2026 at 3:12 PM
I feel like a mod solely to make the female secretary character curvier is the sort of thing we should be mocking.
The paper that YahooNews posted hits the word count.
December 1, 2025 at 5:20 PM
The paper that YahooNews posted hits the word count.
They did not demonstrate they completed the reading though.
The article was about cis kids rating each others’ popularity and the student wrote about the garden of eden, demonic transgenders, and free speech.
She did not even realize that she agreed with the article on a few points.
The article was about cis kids rating each others’ popularity and the student wrote about the garden of eden, demonic transgenders, and free speech.
She did not even realize that she agreed with the article on a few points.
December 1, 2025 at 2:48 PM
They did not demonstrate they completed the reading though.
The article was about cis kids rating each others’ popularity and the student wrote about the garden of eden, demonic transgenders, and free speech.
She did not even realize that she agreed with the article on a few points.
The article was about cis kids rating each others’ popularity and the student wrote about the garden of eden, demonic transgenders, and free speech.
She did not even realize that she agreed with the article on a few points.
You should probably read the article she was supposed to be reacting to before declaring that they deserved better than a 0.
An off-topic response doesn't deserve any points.
An off-topic response doesn't deserve any points.
December 1, 2025 at 2:58 AM
You should probably read the article she was supposed to be reacting to before declaring that they deserved better than a 0.
An off-topic response doesn't deserve any points.
An off-topic response doesn't deserve any points.
Fascinating.
I assume, however, that at least one of these graders is trusted to pass judgment on the merit of the work.
Or is it just a series of rubber stamps?
I assume, however, that at least one of these graders is trusted to pass judgment on the merit of the work.
Or is it just a series of rubber stamps?
November 29, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Fascinating.
I assume, however, that at least one of these graders is trusted to pass judgment on the merit of the work.
Or is it just a series of rubber stamps?
I assume, however, that at least one of these graders is trusted to pass judgment on the merit of the work.
Or is it just a series of rubber stamps?
If you don’t trust the grader to grade papers then you are opposed to the very idea of schooling.
I’ve read the article and can confidently say that the essay writer hasn’t read it because several of the ‘criticisms’ she brings up have nothing to do with the study.
I.e. she’s padding word count
I’ve read the article and can confidently say that the essay writer hasn’t read it because several of the ‘criticisms’ she brings up have nothing to do with the study.
I.e. she’s padding word count
November 29, 2025 at 7:53 PM
If you don’t trust the grader to grade papers then you are opposed to the very idea of schooling.
I’ve read the article and can confidently say that the essay writer hasn’t read it because several of the ‘criticisms’ she brings up have nothing to do with the study.
I.e. she’s padding word count
I’ve read the article and can confidently say that the essay writer hasn’t read it because several of the ‘criticisms’ she brings up have nothing to do with the study.
I.e. she’s padding word count
There’s no reason to think that grading was used as punishment for being politically out of line.
The rubric clearly says that no credit will be given for responses of less than 620 words. If you remove the non sequiturs, she is well below that limit.
The rubric clearly says that no credit will be given for responses of less than 620 words. If you remove the non sequiturs, she is well below that limit.
November 29, 2025 at 7:42 PM
There’s no reason to think that grading was used as punishment for being politically out of line.
The rubric clearly says that no credit will be given for responses of less than 620 words. If you remove the non sequiturs, she is well below that limit.
The rubric clearly says that no credit will be given for responses of less than 620 words. If you remove the non sequiturs, she is well below that limit.
Good for you. However, the teacher did diagnose the cause, and codes of conducts have always existed in universities.
It's absurd to think that an essay should be graded on an easier scale and given pity points just because it's offensive.
It's absurd to think that an essay should be graded on an easier scale and given pity points just because it's offensive.
November 29, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Good for you. However, the teacher did diagnose the cause, and codes of conducts have always existed in universities.
It's absurd to think that an essay should be graded on an easier scale and given pity points just because it's offensive.
It's absurd to think that an essay should be graded on an easier scale and given pity points just because it's offensive.
It’s included under clarity of writing. Going off on an unrelated bigoted tangent means your thoughts are not organized into a coherent discussion.
Also, like, feedback on essays often includes general feedback on your writing beyond a simple accounting of where you lost points.
Also, like, feedback on essays often includes general feedback on your writing beyond a simple accounting of where you lost points.
November 29, 2025 at 6:34 PM
It’s included under clarity of writing. Going off on an unrelated bigoted tangent means your thoughts are not organized into a coherent discussion.
Also, like, feedback on essays often includes general feedback on your writing beyond a simple accounting of where you lost points.
Also, like, feedback on essays often includes general feedback on your writing beyond a simple accounting of where you lost points.
Zero points is not vindictive if they didn’t read the article. The article wasn’t about whether traditional gender roles were stereotypes, and it’s perfectly fine to mention that an essay is offensive as part of feedback.
November 29, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Zero points is not vindictive if they didn’t read the article. The article wasn’t about whether traditional gender roles were stereotypes, and it’s perfectly fine to mention that an essay is offensive as part of feedback.
At no point did they demonstrate that they read the full article. You can’t give them pity points because their reaction isn’t germane. The study was about peer relations and gender typicality. It wasn’t about multiple genders (or eliminating gender, or whether gender roles were good) at all.
November 29, 2025 at 6:07 PM
At no point did they demonstrate that they read the full article. You can’t give them pity points because their reaction isn’t germane. The study was about peer relations and gender typicality. It wasn’t about multiple genders (or eliminating gender, or whether gender roles were good) at all.
I disagree. I don’t think antifascism requires too many principles or is a high bar to pass. Practical opposition to fascism is enough.
Decreasing the teenage pregnancy rate, for example, was antifascist. USAID was antifascist. Fighting fascist Italy was antifascist.
Decreasing the teenage pregnancy rate, for example, was antifascist. USAID was antifascist. Fighting fascist Italy was antifascist.
November 7, 2025 at 6:26 PM
I disagree. I don’t think antifascism requires too many principles or is a high bar to pass. Practical opposition to fascism is enough.
Decreasing the teenage pregnancy rate, for example, was antifascist. USAID was antifascist. Fighting fascist Italy was antifascist.
Decreasing the teenage pregnancy rate, for example, was antifascist. USAID was antifascist. Fighting fascist Italy was antifascist.
It's weird cuz he thinks the medieval setting justifies things despite him describing the girl as a highschooler right before that.
![A: I'm pretty sure he does do that stuff? He beats up molesters, but he also hangs out with them. He rescues Tili, but leverages that to try to get a date with her. He kisses the underaged Tili and presses his erection against her. He's a nice guy, but he's of the same ilk as his friend Thilso.
B: Papris is only a little older than Tili. You can't be "underage" when you're in high school. When they make out she's fully consenting. What are you talking about.
A: I'm going off of Tili being 15 and the "boys [having] several years... on her" and also that Papris is described as a college drop out.
I really think the story supports Tili being underaged as compared to Papris. Am I missing something there?
B: College doesn't mean the same thing to someone in the 1600s as it does today. I didn't specify his age but he's not like 22, he's maybe 18 or 19 and she's got a bit of wisdom beyond her years. This is normal stuff, especially for medieval theming.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wjp5ryt77sle2cztjk7laqu2/bafkreigwsxc3u24w2ai3rjzw7ykhqgpjcdaf3zf7tf3gmvpj5yvesohgsa@jpeg)
November 2, 2025 at 9:50 PM
It's weird cuz he thinks the medieval setting justifies things despite him describing the girl as a highschooler right before that.
It’s infuriating because he straight up says he agrees with the fictional sex pests, but then acts like you’re just upset about rough fiction if you criticize him.
![A: … He kisses the underaged Tili and presses his erection against her. He's a nice guy, but he's of the same ilk as his friend Thilso.
B: Papris is only a little older than Tili. You can't be "underage" when you're in high school. When they make out she's fully consenting. What are you talking about.
A: I'm going off of Tili being 15 and the
"boys [having] several years... on her" and also that Papris is described as a college drop out.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wjp5ryt77sle2cztjk7laqu2/bafkreiek7zctcwugxhcsmcqv255qw7bqjs3rtpquiwntnjkv2ns55d73hy@jpeg)
October 31, 2025 at 2:21 PM
It’s infuriating because he straight up says he agrees with the fictional sex pests, but then acts like you’re just upset about rough fiction if you criticize him.
I should clarify. He said these things in defense of a fictional pedophile that he thought was morally righteous.
October 30, 2025 at 3:10 PM
I should clarify. He said these things in defense of a fictional pedophile that he thought was morally righteous.
He’s also a pedo. Like, he actually thinks grown men dating high schoolers is normal stuff and talks about girls having ‘wisdom beyond their years’.
October 30, 2025 at 2:53 PM
He’s also a pedo. Like, he actually thinks grown men dating high schoolers is normal stuff and talks about girls having ‘wisdom beyond their years’.
It’s still very much about porn because porn is the biggest and most accessible ‘community’ that will indulge their rampant misogyny. They want to export the politics of porn to their other hobbies.
October 12, 2025 at 3:48 PM
It’s still very much about porn because porn is the biggest and most accessible ‘community’ that will indulge their rampant misogyny. They want to export the politics of porn to their other hobbies.
Yeah, part of engaging with art can be deciding it has no redeeming social importance.
September 30, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Yeah, part of engaging with art can be deciding it has no redeeming social importance.
How can Thomas be the one creating contact when she was in that space first and Phee ran into her? You can see Phee drive her leg forward into the center of the defender's body. I thought Phee has no right to initiate contact after she loses the ball.
September 27, 2025 at 8:18 PM
How can Thomas be the one creating contact when she was in that space first and Phee ran into her? You can see Phee drive her leg forward into the center of the defender's body. I thought Phee has no right to initiate contact after she loses the ball.
It's actually Phee's non-plant leg that crashes into Thomas' thigh and makes her ankle land weirdly. Thomas had position.
September 27, 2025 at 4:08 AM
It's actually Phee's non-plant leg that crashes into Thomas' thigh and makes her ankle land weirdly. Thomas had position.
I don’t think that’s true. If art is political, then those politics can be objectionable and push the Overton window to the right even if they stop short of advocating you do violence in real life. If you’d ban incel art and a lot of non con is incel art, then wouldn’t you ban a lot of that too?
September 20, 2025 at 3:00 PM
I don’t think that’s true. If art is political, then those politics can be objectionable and push the Overton window to the right even if they stop short of advocating you do violence in real life. If you’d ban incel art and a lot of non con is incel art, then wouldn’t you ban a lot of that too?
No, I mean like the not tame kinks. There’s noncon art that’s made and shared by incels for incel purposes. Like, I wouldn’t argue to ban John Wick. But I wouldn’t say every video that depicts killing gets a free pass either. I don’t think eroticism inoculates art from actively advocating for harm.
September 20, 2025 at 7:16 AM
No, I mean like the not tame kinks. There’s noncon art that’s made and shared by incels for incel purposes. Like, I wouldn’t argue to ban John Wick. But I wouldn’t say every video that depicts killing gets a free pass either. I don’t think eroticism inoculates art from actively advocating for harm.
No I don’t. I’d happily watch incels get banned just the same as any other right wing provocateur.
September 20, 2025 at 7:03 AM
No I don’t. I’d happily watch incels get banned just the same as any other right wing provocateur.