What are you not liking and/or missing specifically? I use obsidian some of the time, but I use neovim with plugins on the same directory more often than not. I'm more comfortable in it. But if I need to look at images in the md files, then I resort to opening obsidian

It's something you *do*, not a server somewhere. But like everything in this field, the name has drifted from it's original meaning. (Just like "agile" doesn't mean today what it originally meant)

I know this probably sounds odd if you have been told you do CICD, but CI literally means continuous integration: ie continuously integrating your code with everyone else's.

But for closed source projects where you know the people working on it, my preference is for continuous integration. Check out trunkbaseddevelopment.com and martinfowler.com/articles/bra....

PRs were made for open source projects. Fundamentally, you don't trust the authors of the PR, so you want to block them from merging. This works great for OS, and honestly I'm not sure what could be better for that.

In my experience, it was much better without PRs. Not everything has to be operated like an open source project. Especially, ya know, projects that aren't open source.

I like the way you think

That's slick. I dig it.

This looks amazing

m.youtube.com/watch?v=oAbG...

As silly as this is, it's just gonna get sillier!

I think it's just as effective for onboarding seniors+ as well - not just juniors. I know a lot of senior+ egos won't let them admit that out loud, but we all know it's true.

You got this. I believe in you.

according to this young man, the button does everything you need. 🤷

All too often, that means making the tests cement around what the code does, not using tests to make the code what you want it to do.

I value small commits and getting them into mainline. GeePaw's MMMSS ( take many more, much smaller [safer] steps ). I value the feedback of taking small steps, and not "coding the happy happy path" and then "fixing the tests".