Geoffrey Manne
@geoffmanne.bsky.social
620 followers 270 following 15 posts
President & Founder, International Center for Law & Economics. Visiting Professor of Law, IE Law School (Madrid). Focus on antitrust, telecom, regulation, privacy, data, IP, etc.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
briancalbrecht.bsky.social
Our new post on labor markets and antitrust. Lots of putting the cart before the horse in this field
geoffmanne.bsky.social
The push for aggressive labor antitrust enforcement is growing, but is it backed by solid evidence? At Truth on the Market, @briancalbrecht.bsky.social and I argue that the case for expanded labor antitrust is (at least so far) weaker than proponents claim. 🧵
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
crampell.bsky.social
CBO releases estimates for how tariff Trump tariffs affect prices & GDP.
The combination of a uniform increase in tariffs of 10% +
additional 50% on goods imported from China would
increase the level of the PCE price index by roughly 1%, and reduce real GDP by 0.6%
www.cbo.gov/publication/....
Effects of Illustrative Policies That Would Increase Tariffs
CBO provides a preliminary assessment of the budgetary, economic, and distributional effects of three policies that would raise tariff rates on goods imported into the United States.
www.cbo.gov
geoffmanne.bsky.social
Labor-market harms should be considered in antitrust enforcement. But effective policy requires sound evidence and practical tools — not premature, economy-wide changes. Sweeping reforms based on limited evidence risk imposing high costs with little benefit.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
The FTC’s proposed HSR rule changes would have imposed considerable compliance costs, requiring firms to report labor data with little analytical value. Even workplace-safety violations were included — without evidence linking them to market power.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
Defining relevant labor markets for antitrust is another challenge. Take the FTC’s Kroger/Albertsons case: it defined a market for “union grocery labor,” ignoring competition from non-union jobs and other industries. This narrow definition doesn’t reflect reality.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
Meanwhile, the models & measures used in labor economics weren't developed with antitrust enforcement in mind and may not capture the antitrust-relevant complexities. Holyoak is right to suggest caution, and Posner is wrong to take her to task for doing so.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
In fairness, a recent BLS study finds higher concentration by some measures. But that's the point: at best we really don't know; the evidence certainly isn't overwhelming. www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/20....
geoffmanne.bsky.social
Beyond these few studies, it's not even clear that labor-market concentration is a significant concern. Labor-market concentration has actually declined over time, as shown by @kevinrinz.bsky.social and others. Claims of pervasive employer dominance are overstated.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
The studies cited by Posner — which do indeed constitute the bulk of the direct evidence — show *context-specific* effects, not broad evidence of systemic labor-market harm from mergers. The empirical base linking mergers to wage suppression is remarkably thin.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
The push for aggressive labor antitrust enforcement is growing, but is it backed by solid evidence? At Truth on the Market, @briancalbrecht.bsky.social and I argue that the case for expanded labor antitrust is (at least so far) weaker than proponents claim. 🧵
geoffmanne.bsky.social
The speaker lineup for our Jan. 17 "Substance Over Slogans" antitrust event in Paris is phenomenal, IMHO. Registration is open and spots are filling up!

More info/registration here: laweconcenter.org/events/subs...
geoffmanne.bsky.social
Wow! Huge congratulations to ICLE board member, ICLE academic affiliate, and UChicago Law prof., Todd Henderson, on his victory over an incredibly tough field of competitors in the George Mason LEC Manne Madness Tournament!!
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
michaelrstrain.bsky.social
1/ The attached paragraph, from @noahpinion.blogsky.venki.dev's newsletter this morning, is in my view largely correct. This isn't the point of Noah's newsletter, but reading that paragraph made me think two steps further.
geoffmanne.bsky.social
One month before a new admin., w/ no replacement, & no guidance. Oh, no, I'm sorry; there's this:

"[Collaborators] are encouraged to review the relevant statutes and caselaw to assess whether a collaboration would violate the law."

www.ftc.gov/news-events...
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
briancalbrecht.bsky.social
“Substance Over Slogans: Strengthening the Foundations of Antitrust”

Join us in Paris on Jan. 17, 2025, for an incredible event!
laweconcenter.org/events/subst...
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
briancalbrecht.bsky.social
I've created an Antitrust Starter Pack. I didn't see anything quite like that. I'll keep updating as I discover more
go.bsky.app/TBsz8jL
Reposted by Geoffrey Manne
techfreedom.org
The Department of Justice wants to redesign the iPhone ecosystem. What could possibly go wrong!

On the latest Tech Policy Podcast, ICLE's president @geoffmanne.bsky.social returns to discuss the ins and outs of the DoJ’s Apple antitrust case.

podcast.techfreedom.org/episodes/390...